| Literature DB >> 27048200 |
Teobald Kupka1, Aneta Buczek2, Małgorzata A Broda3, Michał Stachów3, Przemysław Tarnowski3.
Abstract
Detailed density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the structure and harmonic frequencies of model all-trans and all-cis polyenes were undertaken. For the first time, we report on the convergence of selected B3LYP/6-311++G** and BLYP/6-311++G** calculated structural parameters resulting from a systematic increase inEntities:
Keywords: All-cis polyenes; All-trans polyenes; C-C bond; C = C bond; DFT; IR and Raman spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27048200 PMCID: PMC4821862 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-016-2969-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Model ISSN: 0948-5023 Impact factor: 1.810
Scheme 1Ethylene and model all-trans (top) and all-cis (bottom) polyenes containing 2–14 conjugated C = C units
Scheme 2Numbering pattern of double (Dn) and single (Sn) bonds in all-trans (left) and all-cis (right) polyene molecules C3 containing three double bonds
Fig. 1Changes in B3LYP/6-311++G**-calculated C = C (a) and C–C (b) bond lengths in all-trans polyenes with 1–14 conjugated double bond units. Convergences of terminal C = C and C–C bond lengths in the middle of molecule with increasing chain length are indicated
Fig. 2a–dConvergence of B3LYP/6-311++G**-calculated C = C and C–C bond lengths in all-trans polyenes. a Result of three parameter fit using 1–14 (dotted blue line) and 2–14 terminal C = C bonds (red continuous line). b Result of three parameter fit using 1–7 (dotted blue line) and 2–14 (red continuous line) C = C bonds in the middle of the chain. c Comparison of available experimental and high level theoretical results for terminal C = C bonds in ethylene and small all-trans polyenes with B3LYP/6-311++G** results. d Comparison of available experimental and high level theoretical results for terminal C–C bonds in ethylene and small all-trans polyenes with B3LYP/6-311++G** results
Fig. 3An alternative way of presenting terminal C = C and C–C bond length convergence in ethylene and all-trans C2-C14 polyenes vs chain length (as function of 1/n, see Fig. 1 in [47]). Polynomial instead of linear fit was used
Fig. 4Opposite patterns of terminal C–C and C = C bond lengths change along all-trans and all-cis polyene chains containing 14 conjugated double bonds (B3LYP/6-311++G** results)
Estimated C = C and C–C bond lengths for very long all-trans and all-cis polyene chains (from three-parameter fitting of B3LYP and BLYP values calculated with 6-311++G** basis set) and deviations from the reference C = C and C–C values
| Bond | All-trans | All-cis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B3LYP | BLYP | B3LYP | BLYP | |
| C = C | ||||
| Terminal | 1.343 | 1.357 | 1.342 | 1.355 |
| Middle | 1.366 | 1.387 | 1.365 | 1.385 |
| C-C | ||||
| Terminal | 1.444 | 1.446 | 1.448 | 1.450 |
| Middle | 1.426 | 1.422 | 1.436 | 1.433 |
| Referencea | ||||
| C = C in C2H4 | 1.329 | 1.338 | 1.329 | 1.338 |
| “naked” C-C sp2-sp2 | 1.482b | |||
| C-C in C2H6 | 1.531 | 1.542 | 1.531 | 1.542 |
| Deviation | ||||
| C = C from C2H4 | ||||
| Terminal | 0.014 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Middle | 0.037 | 0.048 | 0.037 | 0.046 |
| C-C from “naked” C-C | ||||
| Terminal | −0.037 | −0.036 | −0.034 | −0.032 |
| Middle | −0.056 | −0.060 | −0.046 | −0.048 |
aThis work
bfrom [13]
Fig. 5Dependence of a νC = C vs the length of C = C bond, b νC-C vs the length of C = C bond, and c νC–C vs the length of C–C bond in the middle of C2–C14 all-trans polyene chains (the C1 result for ethylene is also included). The trend line obtained from second order polynomial fit and experimental Raman frequency for red coral is also shown
BLYP/6-311++G**-calculated harmonic frequencies of ν(C = C) and ν(C–C) vibrations in ethylene, and first members of all-trans and all-cis Cn polyenes containing up to 14 conjugated carbon–carbon double bonds. The most intense Raman active modes are showna
| Cn | ν(C = C) | ν(C–C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| trans | cis | trans | Cis | |
| 1 | 1628.93 | 1628.93 | ||
| 2 | 1629.93 | 1629.93 | 1193.86 | 1193.86 |
| 3 | 1607.24 | 1605.9 | 1185.64 | 1253.31 |
| 4 | 1582.56 | 1573.59 | 1180.06 | 1260.07 |
| 5 | 1559.42 | 1557.97 | 1172.85 | 1259.84 |
| 6 | 1538.25 | 1542.76 | 1164.46 | 1256.84 |
| 7 | 1521.86 | 1532.05 | 1158.78 | 1250.13 |
| 8 | 1506.94 | 1523.55 | 1152.37 | 1247.82 |
| 9 | 1488.67 | 1515.96 | 1131.3 | 1239.69 |
| 10 | 1478.27 | 1509.63 | 1123.23 | 1235.43 |
| 11 | 1469.2 | 1505.82 | 1116.21 | 1229.84 |
| 12 | 1465.43 | –a | 1113.52 | –a |
| 13 | 1456.16 | 1499.01 | 1105.66 | 1221.84 |
| 14 | 1451.75 | –a | 1097.77 | –a |
aDue to convergence problems some structures were not analyzed
Fig. 6Sensitivity of Raman active single, and double carbon–carbon stretching frequencies (unscaled BLYP/6-311++G** results) to the length of all-trans and all-cis polyene chains. The observed band position in Raman spectra of red coral (continuous line) is also shown
Fig. 7a Comparison of BLYP/6-311++G**-calculated (unscaled) harmonic ν(C = C) and ν(C–C) frequencies in all-trans tert-butyl ended polyenes containing 3 to 12 C = C bonds with experimental values. b Trends in deviations between B3LYP/6-311++G**-calculated harmonic ν(C = C) and ν(C–C) frequencies in all-trans tert-butyl ended polyenes vs. chain length. Linear fits of data points and fitting parameters are also shown
Fig. 8Comparison between raw and corrected B3LYP/6-311++G** calculated harmonic ν(C = C) and ν(C–C) frequencies in ethylene and all-trans C2 – C14 polyenes with reported Raman bands position in red coral pigment