Literature DB >> 2704800

Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression.

J E Berkowitz1, O M Gatewood, B W Gayler.   

Abstract

Seventy-five spot compression views of equivocally suspicious lesions detected at routine mammographic examination of 72 women were reviewed in this retrospective study. Sixty-five of the 75 lesions appeared less suspicious on spot compression views, two did not change, and eight appeared more suspicious. Biopsy findings confirmed that the eight more suspicious lesions were cancer. The adjunctive use of spot compression helped characterize equivocal findings seen on routine mammographic views and improved the accuracy of mammographic interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2704800     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

Authors:  Mitra Noroozian; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam; Katherine A Klein; Deborah O Jeffries; Renee W Pinsky; Heang-Ping Chan; Paul L Carson; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Masses in the era of screening tomosynthesis: Is diagnostic ultrasound sufficient?

Authors:  Sadia Choudhery; Jessica Axmacher; Amy Lynn Conners; Jennifer Geske; Kathy Brandt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Francesca Cavagnetto; Raffaella Rosasco; Giuseppe Rescinito; Francesco Monetti; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  An Effective Way to Solve Equivocal Mammography Findings: The Rolled Views.

Authors:  Emel Alimoglu; Kagan Ceken; Adnan Kabaalioglu; Enrico Cassano; Timur Sindel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Breast Positioning during Mammography: Mistakes to be Avoided.

Authors:  Manju Bala Popli; Rahul Teotia; Meenakshi Narang; Hare Krishna
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2014-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.