Literature DB >> 27047999

An integrative review of in situ simulation training: Implications for critical care nurses.

Catherine Villemure, Issam Tanoubi, L Mihai Georgescu, Jean-Nicolas Dubé, Julie Houle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In situ simulation (ISS) is an emerging teaching strategy aimed to improve professionals' competencies and collaborative practice to increase patient safety The impact of ISS is still to be demonstrated before expanding the use of this method in our critical care settings.
PURPOSE: The objective of this paper is to explore the literature regarding ISS training and present advantages and challenges. DESIGN AND
METHOD: An integrative review was conducted, based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Online databases MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched. The main keywords used were "in situ simulation", "communication" and "interdisciplinary". We excluded studies conducted outside of the hospital or the clinic, single case studies and framework analyses.
FINDINGS: Twenty-eight articles were reviewed. Studies were mainly descriptive and exploratory. They underlined the advantages and challenges of the ISS training regarding safety, as well as the perspectives of patients, families, health care providers and administrators. CONCLUSION AND NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Although ISS is a promising educational strategy to increase patient safety, there is still a need for higher evidence level research to support its efficacy to improve competencies. With regard to patient safety improvement, ISS-based training offers opportunities to identify hazards and deficiencies of clinical systems and the provider team. Experimental studies are necessary to increase evidence about the impact of ISS training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27047999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Crit Care Nurs


  6 in total

1.  Multiprofessional perspectives on the identification of latent safety threats via in situ simulation: a prospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel Rusiecki; Melanie Walker; Stuart L Douglas; Sharleen Hoffe; Timothy Chaplin
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 2.  GENESISS 1-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a scoping review and conceptual model.

Authors:  Bryn Baxendale; Kerry Evans; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Guilia Miles; Alastair Ross; Eleanore Dring; Joanne Cooper
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  "No patient should die of PPH just for the lack of training!" Experiences from multi-professional simulation training on postpartum hemorrhage in northern Tanzania: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Signe Egenberg; Bjørg Karlsen; Deodatus Massay; Happiness Kimaro; Lars Edvin Bru
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Adapting form to function: can simulation serve our healthcare system and educational needs?

Authors:  Andrew Petrosoniak; Ryan Brydges; Lori Nemoy; Douglas M Campbell
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-14

Review 5.  The Use of in situ Simulation in Healthcare Education: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Anastasia Martin; Sean Cross; Chris Attoe
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-11-27

6.  Status of Nordic research on simulation-based learning in healthcare: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sissel Eikeland Husebø; Minna Silvennoinen; Eerika Rosqvist; Italo Masiello
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.