Literature DB >> 27047957

Management of lower pole renal stones: the devil is in the details.

Berkan Resorlu1, Yasar Issi1, Kadir Onem1, Cankon Germiyanoglu1.   

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) are highly effective treatment options for lower pole stones up to 2 cm. Selecting the best treatment modality represents a controversial area in urology, because each treatment methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Donaldson and co-workers have recently published a very comprehensive review and meta-analysis to compare the benefits and harms of SWL, RIRS and PNL techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower pole; renal stone; treatment

Year:  2016        PMID： 27047957      PMCID： PMC4791332          DOI： 10.21037/atm.2016.03.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN： 2305-5839


  10 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuba De; Riccardo Autorino; Fernando J Kim; Homayoun Zargar; Humberto Laydner; Raffaele Balsamo; Fabio C Torricelli; Carmine Di Palma; Wilson R Molina; Manoj Monga; Marco De Sio
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Eylem Burcu Resorlu; Derya Oztuna; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.

Authors:  Bhupendra Pal Singh; Jai Prakash; Satya Narayan Sankhwar; Urmila Dhakad; Pushp Lata Sankhwar; Apul Goel; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Hamdy M Ibrahim; Ramy F Youssef; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.

Authors:  James F Donaldson; Michael Lardas; Duncan Scrimgeour; Fiona Stewart; Steven MacLennan; Thomas B L Lam; Samuel McClinton
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changjian Zheng; Hongmei Yang; Jun Luo; Bo Xiong; Hongzhi Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Pawan Vasudeva; Biswajit Nanda; Niraj Kumar; Manoj Kumar Das; Sanjeev Kumar Jha
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Tevfik Ziypak; Akif Diri; Gokhan Atis; Selcuk Guven; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Derya Oztuna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Mi; Kewei Ren; Haiyan Pan; Lijie Zhu; Sheng Wu; Xiaoming You; Hongbao Shao; Feng Dai; Tao Peng; Feng Qin; Jian Wang; Yi Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.436
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?

Authors:  You Jin Lee; Dong Jae Bak; Jae-Wook Chung; Jun Nyung Lee; Hyun Tae Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-07-12

2.  Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy as a monotherapy for the management of intermediate-sized renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Musliyarakath Mujeeburahiman; Chembili Vipin
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.