| Literature DB >> 27047821 |
José Antonio Pinto1, Andréa Canizares Hernandes2, Thais Paula Buchaim2, Francesco Camara Blumetti3, Carla Chertman4, Patrícia Corey Yamane3, Artur da Rocha Corrêa Fernandes5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze morphological abnormalities of the talus in patients with clubfoot after surgical treatment using the McKay technique.Entities:
Keywords: Clubfoot/radiography; Morphology; Operative; Surgical Procedures; Talus
Year: 2015 PMID: 27047821 PMCID: PMC4799229 DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30198-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Data on patients,including age,sex,side affected,date of surgery and date of the radiograph evaluated.
| Patient | Age | Sex | Side | Date of surgery | Date of radiograph |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | M | L | 1990 | Dec 12, 2006 |
| 2 | 7 | M | L | 2003 | Nov 28, 2007 |
| 3 | 13 | M | R | 1996 | Apr 10, 2008 |
| 4 | 8 | M | L | 2002 | Mar 5, 2008 |
| 5 | 7 | M | L | 2002 | Nov 9, 2005 |
| 6 | 7 | F | L | 2003 | Nov 4, 2005 |
| 7 | 10 | M | L | 2001 | Feb 7, 2007 |
| 8 | 11 | M | L | 2002 | Jun 6, 2008 |
| 9 | 11 | M | R | 1999 | Feb 12, 2009 |
| 10 | 14 | M | L | 1999 | Mar 10, 2006 |
| 11 | 8 | F | L | 2000 | Nov 26, 2008 |
| 12 | 11 | M | R | 1999 | Mar 6, 2008 |
| 13 | 8 | M | L | 2001 | Sep 18, 2008 |
| 14 | 8 | M | L | 2002 | Mar 14, 2007 |
Figure 1Talar sphericity patterns: (A) normal, enabling good mobility of the joint; (B) slightly flattened; (C) greatly altered or flat.
Figure 2Sphericity patterns for the talonavicular joint: talar head (A) convex; (B) planar; (C) concave.
Figure 3Illustration of measurement of talar height (explained in text).
Figure 4Illustration of measurement of talar length (explained in text).
Figure 5Illustration of calculation of degree of navicular subluxation (explained in text).
Data on patients regarding the results from the radiographic parameters evaluated.
| Patient | Deformity of head | Deformity of dome | Height ratio | Length ratio | Trabecular type | Gissane increase | Navicular subluxation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flattened | Planar | 0.86 | 0.79 | Mixed | 40° | 25.12% |
| 2 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.92 | 0.84 | Mixed | 30° | 41.17% |
| 3 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.57 | 0.84 | Vertical | 7° | 8.02% |
| 4 | Flattened | Planar | 0.95 | 0.77 | Vertical | 20° | 22.29% |
| 5 | Flattened | Spherical | 0.91 | 0.75 | Mixed | 20° | 20.91% |
| 6 | Convex | Elliptical | 0.98 | 0.87 | Mixed | 24° | 58.80% |
| 7 | Concave | Elliptical | 0.86 | 0.86 | Mixed | 30° | 12.33% |
| 8 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.82 | 0.88 | Vertical | 2° | 33.74% |
| 9 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.87 | 0.61 | Vertical | 30° | 17.33% |
| 10 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.76 | 0.74 | Vertical | 22° | 6.43% |
| 11 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.75 | 0.88 | Mixed | 20° | 17.06% |
| 12 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.84 | 0.86 | Vertical | 8° | 23.71% |
| 13 | Flattened | Planar | 0.7 | 0.80 | Vertical | 26° | 59.75% |
| 14 | Flattened | Elliptical | 0.65 | 0.61 | Vertical | 10° | 22.19% |