Literature DB >> 27047778

Comparative study of software techniques for 3D mapping of perforators in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap planning.

Michael P Chae1, David J Hunter-Smith1, Warren Matthew Rozen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomographic (CT) angiography (CTA) is widely considered the gold standard imaging modality for preoperative planning autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap. Improved anatomical understanding from CTA has translated to enhanced clinical outcomes. To achieve this, the use of appropriate CT hardware and software is vital. Various CT scanners and contrast materials have been demonstrated to consistently produce adequate scan data. However, the availability of affordable and easily accessible imaging software capable of generating 3D volume-rendered perforator images to clinically useful quality has been lacking. Osirix (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) is a free, readily available medical image processing software that shows promise. We have previously demonstrated in a case report the usefulness of Osirix in localizing perforators and their course.
METHODS: In the current case series of 50 consecutive CTA scans, we compare the accuracy of Osirix to a commonly used proprietary 3D imaging software, Siemens Syngo InSpace 4D (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), in identifying perforator number and location. Moreover, we compared both programs to intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: We report a high rate of concordance with Osirix and Siemens Syngo InSpace 4D (99.6%). Both programs correlated closely with operative findings (92.2%). Most of the discrepancies were found in the lateral row perforators (90%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we report the accuracy of Osirix that is comparable to Siemens Syngo InSpace 4D, a proprietary software, in mapping perforators. However, it provides an added advantage of being free, easy-to-use, portable, and potentially a superior quality of 3D reconstructed image.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomographic angiography (CTA); Osirix; Siemens; accuracy; perforator imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27047778      PMCID: PMC4791354          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.06.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  28 in total

1.  3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps.

Authors:  Gedge D Rosson; Christopher G Williams; Elliot K Fishman; Navin K Singh
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.425

2.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for preoperative imaging of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: advantages and disadvantages compared with computed tomography angiography: a United Kingdom perspective.

Authors:  Mark V Schaverien; Catherine N Ludman; Jason Neil-Dwyer; Stephen J McCulley
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Preoperative vascular mapping with multislice CT of deep inferior epigastric artery perforators in planning breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  A Pellegrin; T Stocca; M Belgrano; M Bertolotto; F Pozzi-Mucelli; Z Marij Arnež; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A Cina; L Barone-Adesi; P Rinaldi; A Cipriani; M Salgarello; R Masetti; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps.

Authors:  J Masia; J A Clavero; J R Larrañaga; X Alomar; G Pons; P Serret
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  CT-guided deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap localization -- better for the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital.

Authors:  A Malhotra; N Chhaya; P Nsiah-Sarbeng; A Mosahebi
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Timothy J Phillips; Mark W Ashton; Damien L Stella; Robert N Gibson; G Ian Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Computed tomographic angiography with VirSSPA three-dimensional software for perforator navigation improves perioperative outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Purificación Gacto-Sánchez; Domingo Sicilia-Castro; Tomás Gómez-Cía; Araceli Lagares; Teresa Collell; Cristina Suárez; Carlos Parra; Sandra Leal; Pedro Infante-Cossío; Jose María De La Higuera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Advantages of preoperative computed tomography in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  William J Casey; Roderick T Chew; Alanna M Rebecca; Anthony A Smith; Joseph M Collins; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  6 in total

1.  S122: impact of fluorescence and 3D images to completeness of lateral pelvic node dissection.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Soo Yeun Park; Seung Hyun Cho; An Na Seo; Ghuil Suk Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Automatic detection of perforator vessels using infrared thermography in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Michael Unger; Miriam Markfort; Dirk Halama; Claire Chalopin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Automating Perforator Flap MRA and CTA Reporting.

Authors:  Christopher J Lange; Nanda Deepa Thimmappa; Srikanth R Boddu; Silvina P Dutruel; Mengchao Pei; Zerwa Farooq; Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi; Yi Wang; Ramin Zabih; Martin R Prince
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Erratum to comparative study of software techniques for 3D mapping of perforators in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap planning.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  3D-printed, patient-specific DIEP flap templates for preoperative planning in breast reconstruction: a prospective case series.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Ru Dee Chung; Julian A Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

6.  Virtual Planning of Profunda Femoral Artery and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flaps.

Authors:  Susana Heredero; María Isabel Falguera-Uceda; Alba Sanjuan-Sanjuan; Stacey Nedrud; Juan Solivera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.