| Literature DB >> 27047749 |
Cairen Chen1, Weili Wang2, Qingyong Meng1, Ning Wu3, Jun Wei4.
Abstract
A recent study reported that circulating antibodies to CD25-derived peptide antigens were significantly higher in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than control subjects. The present study was, thus, undertaken to replicate the initial finding with different sample sets. An in-house ELISA was applied to determine circulating IgG antibodies to linear peptide antigens derived from CD25. A total of 111 patients with NSCLC and 216 control subjects were recruited and divided into the discovery sample (51 vs 108) and the validation sample (60 vs 108) based on the time of sampling. Student's t test showed that circulating anti-CD25 IgG levels were significantly higher in the patient group than the control group (t = 2.23, P = 0.027) and the validation sample replicated this finding (t = 3.31, P = 0.0012), generating a combined P value of 0.0004 (χ(2) = 20.8, df = 4). Fisher's combining probability revealed that patients with stage IV NSCLC had a significant increase in anti-CD25 IgG levels compared with control subjects (χ(2) = 22.1, df = 4, P = 0.0002) but those with the other three stages did not. This study suggests that circulating anti-CD25 IgG antibodies may have prognostic rather than early diagnostic values for lung cancer.Entities:
Keywords: CD25; antibody test; nonsmall cell lung cancer; tumor immunity
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047749 PMCID: PMC4794780 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
Analysis of circulating levels of IgG antibodies to CD25 in NSCLC
| Sample | Patient ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 0.99 ± 0.20 (51) | 0.92 ± 0.17 (108) | 2.23 | 0.027 |
| Validation | 0.85 ± 0.18 (60) | 0.77 ± 0.13 (108) | 3.31 | 0.0012 |
The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.
Student's t test (two‐tailed).
Combining probabilities: χ2 = 20.7, df = 4, P = 0.0004 for anti‐CD25 IgG levels.
The levels of circulating anti‐CD25 IgG in different stages of NSCLC in the discovery sample
| Stage | Patient ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0.94 ± 0.15 (11) | 0.92 ± 0.17 (108) | 0.29 | 0.771 |
| II | 1.04 ± 0.40 (6) | 0.92 ± 0.17 (108) | 1.52 | 0.494 |
| III | 0.95 ± 0.11 (22) | 0.92 ± 0.17 (108) | 0.73 | 0.468 |
| IV | 1.09 ± 0.23 (12) | 0.92 ± 0.17 (108) | 3.10 | 0.002 |
The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.
Student's t test (two‐tailed).
The levels of circulating anti‐CD25 IgG in different stages of NSCLC in the validation sample
| Stage | Patient ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0.84 ± 0.18 (13) | 0.77 ± 0.13 (108) | 1.90 | 0.06 |
| II | 0.88 ± 0.16 (7) | 0.77 ± 0.13 (108) | 2.17 | 0.032 |
| III | 0.82 ± 0.16 (19) | 0.77 ± 0.13 (108) | 1.62 | 0.107 |
| IV | 0.86 ± 0.20 (21) | 0.77 ± 0.13 (108) | 2.71 | 0.008 |
The antibody levels are expressed as mean ± SD in SBI.
Student's t test (two‐tailed).
Combining probabilities calculated based on the P values from the two samples (Tables 2 and 3) in the 4 stages of NSCLC: χ2 = 6.2, df = 4, P = 0.185 for stage I, χ2 = 8.3, df = 4, P = 0.082 for stage II, χ2 = 6, df = 4, P = 0.199 for stage III and χ2 = 22.1, df = 4, P = 0.0002 for stage IV.