| Literature DB >> 27047720 |
Hag Mo Kang1, Soo Im Choi2, Hyun Kim3.
Abstract
This study was conducted to explore an accurate site identification technique using a geographic information system (GIS) and geo-temperature (gT) for locating suitable sites for growing cultivated mountain ginseng (CMG; Panax ginseng), which is highly sensitive to the environmental conditions in which it grows. The study site was Jinan-gun, South Korea. The spatial resolution for geographic data was set at 10 m × 10 m, and the temperatures for various climatic factors influencing CMG growth were calculated by averaging the 3-year temperatures obtained from the automatic weather stations of the Korea Meteorological Administration. Identification of suitable sites for CMG cultivation was undertaken using both a conventional method and a new method, in which the gT was added as one of the most important factors for crop cultivation. The results yielded by the 2 methods were then compared. When the gT was added as an additional factor (new method), the proportion of suitable sites identified decreased by 0.4 % compared with the conventional method. However, the proportion matching real CMG cultivation sites increased by 3.5 %. Moreover, only 68.2 % corresponded with suitable sites identified using the conventional factors; i.e., 31.8 % were newly detected suitable sites. The accuracy of GIS-based identification of suitable CMG cultivation sites improved by applying the temperature factor (i.e., gT) in addition to the conventionally used factors.Entities:
Keywords: Automatic weather station (AWS); Cultivated mountain ginseng (CMG); Geographic information system (GIS); Panax ginseng
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047720 PMCID: PMC4816954 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2031-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1The location map of the study site. Green color indicates the targeted study site (Jinan-gun). This site is located in the eastern mountainous region of Jeollabuk-do (Jeonbuk), South Korea. The locations of the automatic weather stations (AWSs) used in this study are marked as red points
Factors, conditions, and weights for the detection of suitable cultivation sites
| Factor | Condition | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | More than 300 m | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Aspect | North | 1 |
| East, Northeast, Northwest | 0.67 | |
| Others | 0.33 | |
| Slope | <30° | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Forest type (tree species) | Hardwood forest | 1 |
| Mixed forest | 0.67 | |
| Others | 0.33 | |
| Soil organic content | 2–9 % | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Effective soil depth | More than 15 cm | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Soil texture | Sandy loam, loam, silty clay loam | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Soil humidity | Suitable humidity | 1 |
| Other | 0.5 | |
| Drainage | Good condition | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Annual average temperature (Jan 1–Dec 31) | 0–10 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Summer temperature (Jul 1–Aug 31) | 20–25 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Temperature during germination (Mar 1–Mar 20) | 5–15 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Temperature during sprouting (Mar 21–Apr 10) | 5–15 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Temperature during leafing (Apr 11–May 10) | 10–20 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 | |
| Temperature during flowering/fruiting (May 11–Jun 30) | 20–25 °C | 1 |
| Others | 0.5 |
Reference temperature for each temperature factor (average temperature)
| Temperature factor | Temperature for each AWS location (elevation) (°C) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinan-eup (351.4 m) | Jucheon-myeon (259.0 m) | Donghyang-myeon (320.2 m) | Jeonju-si (53.4 m) | Geumsan-gun (170.4 m) | Imsil-gun (247.9 m) | Jangsu-gun (406.5 m) | Muju-gun (205.8 m) | |
| A | 12.8 (10.7)a | 12.0 (10.4) | 12.1 (10.2) | 14.0 (13.6) | 12.7 (11.7) | 12.6 (11.1) | 13.1 (10.6) | 12.5 (11.3) |
| B | 26.2 (24.1) | 25.3 (23.8) | 25.7 (23.7) | 27.1 (26.8) | 26.4 (25.4) | 25.9 (24.5) | 26.2 (23.8) | 26.2 (24.9) |
| C | 5.9 (3.8) | 5.5 (3.9) | 5.3 (3.4) | 6.5 (6.1) | 5.6 (4.6) | 5.3 (3.8) | 6.4 (3.9) | 5.7 (4.5) |
| D | 9.4 (7.2) | 8.5 (7.0) | 8.5 (6.6) | 9.8 (9.5) | 9.2 (8.2) | 8.6 (7.1) | 9.5 (7.0) | 9.1 (7.8) |
| E | 14.6 (12.4) | 13.9 (12.3) | 14.0 (12.0) | 15.3 (15.0) | 14.6 (13.5) | 14.0 (12.5) | 15.1 (12.6) | 14.5 (13.3) |
| F | 21.7 (19.6) | 20.9 (19.3) | 21.1 (19.2) | 22.6 (22.3) | 21.9 (20.9) | 21.4 (19.9) | 22.0 (19.6) | 21.5 (20.3) |
A: Annual average temperature (Jan 1–Dec 31), B: Summer temperature (Jul 1–Aug 31), C: Temperature during germination (Mar 1–Mar 20), D: Temperature during sprouting (Mar 21–Apr 10), E: Temperature during leafing (Apr 11–May 10), F: Temperature during flowering/fruiting (May 11–Jun 30)
aFigures are base temperatures (°C), and the figures in parentheses are the 3-year average temperature (°C)
Fig. 2The geo-temperature maps for each temperature factor. a Annual average temperature, b summer temperature, c germination stage temperature, d sprout stage temperature, e leafing stage temperature, f flowering/fruiting stage temperature
Site identifications yielded by the 2 methods
| Category | Method | |
|---|---|---|
| Application of conventional factors | Addition of geo-temperature | |
| Suitable site | 8209.0 (14.7) | 8026.6 (14.3) |
| Possibly suitable site | 36,647.5 (65.5) | 38,347.1 (68.5) |
| Probably unsuitable site | 8425.1 (15.1) | 8587.8 (15.3) |
| Unsuitable site | 2697.8 (4.8) | 1017.9 (1.8) |
| Total | 55,979.4 (100.0) | 55,979.4 (100.0) |
Values are presented as ha (%)
Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding
Fig. 3Suitable site maps using the conventional factors (a) and the geo-temperature as an additional factor (b). Green, yellow-green, orange, and red indicate suitable site, possibly suitable site, probably unsuitable site, and unsuitable site, respectively
Cross table for comparison of search results by two different methods
| CFa | GTb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suitable site | Possibly suitable site | Probably unsuitable site | Unsuitable site | Total | |
| Suitable site | 5476.2 (66.7) | 2732.8 (33.3) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 8209.0 (100.0) |
| Possibly suitable site | 2550.4 (7.0) | 33,430.5 (91.2) | 666.7 (1.8) | 0.0 (0.0) | 36,647.5 (100.0) |
| Probably unsuitable site | 0.0 (0.0) | 2183.8 (25.9) | 6121.4 (72.7) | 119.8 (1.4) | 8425.1 (100.0) |
| Unsuitable site | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 1799.7 (66.7) | 898.1 (33.3) | 2697.8 (100.0) |
| Total | 8026.6 | 38,347.1 | 8587.8 | 1017.9 | 55,979.4 |
Values are presented as ha (%)
Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding
aCF is the detection result by using conventional factors
bgT is the detection result by using geo-temperature as an additional factor
Overlap ratio between sites identified as suitable and actual CMG cultivation sites
| Category | Real cultivation area (a) (ha) | Overlapped area (b) (ha) | Overlap ratio (b/a) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application of conventional factors | 599.0 | 97.7 | 16.3 |
| Addition of geo-temperature | 599.0 | 118.9 | 19.8 |