| Literature DB >> 27047688 |
Ayotunde James Fasunla1, Adekunle Daniel1, Ukamaka Nwankwo1, Kehinde Mobolanle Kuti2, Onyekwere George Nwaorgu1, Olusina Olusegun Akinyinka3.
Abstract
Background. Compliance with medication requires good sense of smell and taste. Objective. To evaluate the olfactory and gustatory function of HIV infected women in Ibadan, Nigeria. Methods. A case control study of women comprising 83 HIV infected women and 79 HIV uninfected women. Subjective self-rating of taste and smell function was by visual analogue scale. Olfactory function was measured via olfactory threshold (OT), olfactory discrimination (OD), olfactory identification (OI), and TDI using "Sniffin' sticks" kits and taste function (Total Taste Strips (TTS) score) measurement was by taste strips. Results. The mean age of the HIV infected women was 43.67 years ± 10.72 and control was 41.48 years ± 10.99. There was no significant difference in the self-reported assessment of smell (p = 0.67) and taste (p = 0.84) of HIV infected and uninfected women. Although the mean OT, OD, OI, TDI, and TTS scores of HIV infected and uninfected women were within the normosmic and normogeusic values, the values were significantly higher in the controls (p < 0.05). Hyposmia was in 39.7% of subjects and 12.6% of controls while hypogeusia was in 15.7% of subjects and 1.3% of controls. Conclusions. Hyposmia and hypogeusia are commoner among the HIV infected women than the HIV uninfected women and the risk increases with an increased duration of highly active antiretroviral therapy.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047688 PMCID: PMC4800074 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2045383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Treat ISSN: 2090-1240
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | HIV infected women | HIV uninfected women |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 35 and below | 20 (24.1) | 56 (70.9) |
| 36–55 | 51 (61.4) | 18 (22.8) |
| 56 and above | 12 (14.5) | 5 (6.3) |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 6 (7.2) | 31 (39.2) |
| Married | 64 (77.1) | 47 (59.5) |
| Divorced | 3 (3.6) | 0 |
| Widow | 10 (12.0) | 1 (1.3) |
| Occupation | ||
| Class 1 | 6 (7.2) | 12 (15.2) |
| Class 2 | 26 (31.3) | 24 (30.4) |
| Class 3 | 14 (16.9) | 3 (3.8) |
| Class 4 | 37 (44.6) | 32 (40.5) |
| Class 5 | 0 | 8 (10.1) |
| Preference for taste | ||
| Salt | 33 (39.8) | 29 (36.8) |
| Sweet | 28 (33.7) | 34 (43.0) |
| Sour | 14 (16.9) | 11 (13.9) |
| Bitter | 8 (9.6) | 5 (6.3) |
Comparison of smell and taste of the participants.
| Variable | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Level of significance ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV infected women | HIV uninfected women | ||
| Smell | |||
| Olfactory threshold | 8.1 ± 5.0 | 11.4 ± 2.1 | 0.000 |
| Olfactory discrimination | 10.1 ± 5.0 | 11.7 ± 2.6 | 0.012 |
| Olfactory identification | 9.0 ± 4.7 | 13.3 ± 3.0 | 0.000 |
| TDI | 27.3 ± 11.7 | 36.3 ± 5.0 | 0.000 |
| Taste | |||
| Sweet | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 0.000 |
| Sour | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 0.034 |
| Salty | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 0.000 |
| Bitter | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 0.000 |
| TTS | 25.3 ± 5.9 | 29.0 ± 3.8 | 0.040 |
| Subjective smell | 8.8 ± 1.4 | 9.1 ± 1.2 | 0.67 |
| Subjective taste | 7.6 ± 2.9 | 8.6 ± 1.9 | 0.84 |
Participants with hyposmia and hypogeusia.
| Variables | TDI | TTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyposmia | Normosmia | Hypogeusia | Normogeusia | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HIV infected women | ||||
| 35 and below | 8 (9.6) | 12 (14.5) | 4 (4.8) | 16 (19.3) |
| 36–55 | 19 (22.8) | 32 (38.6) | 6 (7.2) | 45 (54.2) |
| 56 and above | 6 (7.2) | 6 (7.2) | 3 (3.6) | 9 (10.8) |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
| HIV uninfected women | ||||
| 35 and below | 5 (6.3) | 51 (64.6) | 0 | 56 (70.9) |
| 36–55 | 3 (3.8) | 15 (19.0) | 1 (1.3) | 17 (21.5) |
| 56 and above | 2 (2.5) | 3 (3.8) | 0 | 5 (6.3) |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
Types of olfactory dysfunction in the participants.
| Olfactory tests | Hyposmia | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV infected women | HIV uninfected women | |||||
| OT | 27 (81.8) | 6 (60.0) | 5.8661 | 2.2671–15.1781 | 3.648 | 0.0003 |
| OD | 15 (45.5) | 4 (40.0) | 4.1360 | 1.3086–13.0722 | 2.418 | 0.0156 |
| OI | 6 (18.2) | 2 (20.0) | 3.0000 | 0.5871–15.3302 | 1.320 | 0.1868 |
| TDI | 33 (100.0) | 10 (100.0) | 4.5540 | 2.0551–10.0913 | 3.734 | 0.0002 |
Relationship of HIV infection stage with hyposmia and hypogeusia.
| Stage | Nadir CD4+ cell count (cells/ | Olfaction of HIV infected women | Gustation of HIV infected women | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyposmia | Normosmia | Hypogeusia | Normogeusia | ||
| 1 | ≥500 | 8 (9.6%) | 15 (18.1%) | 3 (3.6%) | 7 (8.4%) |
| 2 | 200–499 | 11 (13.2%) | 16 (19.3%) | 5 (6.0%) | 27 (32.5%) |
| 3 | <200 | 14 (16.9%) | 19 (22.9%) | 5 (6.0%) | 36 (43.4%) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Relationship of highly active antiretroviral therapy with hyposmia and hypogeusia.
| Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) | Olfaction test (TDI) | Gustation test (TTS) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyposmia | Normosmia | Hypogeusia | Normogeusia | |
| Nevirapine, zidovudine, and lamivudine |
|
|
|
|
| Tenofovir, lamivudine, and efavirenz |
|
|
|
|
| Tenofovir, lamivudine, zidovudine, and atazanavir |
|
|
|
|
| Tenofovir, lamivudine, lopinavir, and ritonavir |
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Hazard function of HAART on HIV infected participants with hyposmia.
Figure 2Hazard function of HAART on HIV infected participants with hypogeusia.