Root Zone Cooling and Exogenous Spermidine Root-Pretreatment Promoting Lactuca sativa L. Growth and Photosynthesis in the High-temperature Season.

Root zone high-temperature stress is a major factor limiting hydroponic plant growth during the high-temperature season. The effects of root zone cooling (RZC; at 25°C) and exogenous spermidine (Spd) root-pretreatment (SRP, 0.1 mM) on growth, leaf photosynthetic traits, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of hydroponic Lactuca sativa L. grown in a high-temperature season (average temperature > 30°C) were examined. Both treatments significantly promoted plant growth and photosynthesis in the high-temperature season, but the mechanisms of photosynthesis improvement in the hydroponic grown lettuce plants were different between the RZC and SRP treatments. The former improved plant photosynthesis by increasing stoma conductance (G s) to enhance CO2 supply, thus promoting photosynthetic electron transport activity and phosphorylation, which improved the level of the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), rather than enhancing CO2 assimilation efficiency. The latter improved plant photosynthesis by enhancing CO2 assimilation efficiency, rather than stomatal regulation. Combination of RZC and SRP significantly improved P N of lettuce plants in a high-temperature season by both improvement of G s to enhance CO2 supply and enhancement of CO2 assimilation. The enhancement of photosynthetic efficiency in both treatments was independent of altering light-harvesting or excessive energy dissipation.

Introduction

Temperature is one of the most important environmental factors affecting plant growth and development (Levitt, 1980). The responses of plant growth and photosynthesis to different air temperatures have been intensively studied (Kratsch and Wise, 2000; Wise et al., 2004; Way and Yamori, 2014). However, studies on a plant’s response to root zone temperature remain limited. Root zone temperature is important for plant growth as it greatly affects various growth processes, and is more critical than air temperature in the control of plant growth (Xu and Huang, 2000). In hydroponic systems, the nutrient solution temperature often differs from ambient air temperature (Zheng et al., 1993; Nagasuga et al., 2011). The use of root temperature management can strongly influence plant growth in various species, such as holly (Ilex chinensis Sims; Ruter and Ingram, 1992), cotton (Gossypium spp; McMichael and Burke, 1994), and bean (Phaseolus acutifolius and Proteus vulgaris) (Udomprasert et al., 1993). Some studies reported that plant photosynthesis could be enhanced by reducing the root zone temperature. For example, photosynthetic rate of ‘Rotundifolia’ holly (I. crenata Thunb.) plants grown with root zones at 38 or 42°C was lower than that of at 30 or 34°C (Ruter and Ingram, 1992). Photosynthetic rate in Lactuca sativa plants was higher in root-zone temperature of 20°C condition than that of hot ambient temperature (He et al., 2009). Therefore, in addition to reducing greenhouse air temperature, an appropriate root temperature management methodology may effectively regulate plant photosynthesis, growth and yield with relatively low investment and easier management. Alternatively, increasing plant heat tolerance using plant growth regulators is another option for growing plants in high-temperature seasons.

Polyamines (PAs) are low-molecular-weight aliphatic amine bases with strong biological activity. They are important regulators of plant growth, stress response, and disease resistance (Hussain et al., 2011). In higher plants, the most common PAs are spermidine (Spd), spermine (Spm), and putrescine (Put). PAs are involved in higher plant growth, morphogenesis, and anti-aging regulation, and are also closely related to the ability of a plant to resist adversity stress (Moschou and Roubelakis-Angelakis, 2014). Recently, much attention has been paid to the relationship between PAs and plant responses to abiotic stress. Polyamines can alleviate salt stress on Arabidopsis growth (Ortega-Amaro et al., 2012), improve salt resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants (Pottosin et al., 2014), and increase the heat tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.; Asthir et al., 2012), rice (Oryza sativa; Mohammad et al., 2014), and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plants (Tian et al., 2012). Exogenous Spd pretreatment improves cold resistance of cucumber plants (He et al., 2002b), and improves tolerance to cadmium stress in bulrushes (Typha latifolia L.; Zacchini et al., 2003). Additionally, a significant improvement of heat tolerance is observed in genetically modified tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) with overexpressed PAs, confirming PAs are involved in plant response to heat stress (Cheng et al., 2009). Attentions have been paid to the effects of application of exogenous PAs on plant photosynthesis under various stresses conditions. It has been demonstrated that exogenously applied PAs can rapidly enter the intact chloroplast (He et al., 2002a) and play a role in protecting the photosynthetic apparatus from adverse effects of environmental stresses (Navakoudis et al., 2003). Exogenous PAs improved the photosynthetic capacity of salt-stressed cucumber plants by increasing the level of the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII; Zhang et al., 2009). In green alga (Scenedesmus obliquus) cultivation, exogenously added Put was used to adjust the increase in the functional size of the antenna and the reduction in the density of active PSII reaction centers, so that to confer some kind of tolerance to the photosynthetic apparatus to against enhanced NaCl-salinity and permit cell growth even in NaCl concentrations that under natural conditions would be toxic (Demetriou et al., 2007). Investigations on restoration of the maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) to low salt stressed thylakoid by adding Put, Spd and Spm showed that Spd are the most efficient one in Fv/Fm restoration (Ioannidis and Kotzabasis, 2007). When Physcia semipinnata was exposed to UV-A radiation, it was also found that exogenously Spd applied samples had higher chlorophyll a content and PSII activity than Spm and Put applied samples (Unal et al., 2008).

Lettuce (L. sativa L.) is one of the most commonly cultivated crops used in hydroponics systems. In the summer, high temperatures in the greenhouse are the most significant limiting factor for lettuce production. During the midday period, in the hot summers of the Tokyo region of Japan, the root zone temperature of hydroponic systems often exceeds 30°C (e.g., the root zone temperature can often reach 35°C when the air temperature is 38°C); this strongly suppresses the lettuce growth process and reduces production. Lettuce production is significantly reduced at 30–35°C root zone temperatures compared with when grown at 25°C (Li et al., 2015), with the maximum dry mass of lettuce obtained under 24°C/24°C (air/root zone temperature) conditions (Thompson et al., 1998). Therefore, there is a possibility to improve the growth of lettuce plants in the high-temperature season by decreasing the root zone temperature or enhancing plant heat tolerance using exogenous plants growth regulators.

Photosynthesis is essential for plant growth and development, and an improvement of leaf photosynthesis would lead to enhancement of crop yield (Ainsworth and Long, 2005; Ainsworth, 2008; Yamori et al., 2016). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis, as one of methods of studies in photosynthesis, is one of the most powerful and widespread techniques, which can serve as a sensitive indicator of thylakoid membranes damage and functional changes of photosynthetic apparatus under high temperature stress (Murkowski, 2001). However, information regarding the effects of root zone cooling (RZC) and exogenous PAs/Spd root-pretreatment (SRP) on the photosynthetic characteristics of plants in hydroponic system or the possible alleviation mechanisms of RZC and SRP on the negative effects of high temperature season is limiting in literature currently. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of RZC and SRP (root-soaking) on hydroponic lettuce growth, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics during the high-temperature season. The photosynthetic physiological mechanisms of RZC and SRP on plant growth are discussed.

Materials and Methods

Plants

Experiments were carried out in a glass greenhouse (36 m length, 18 m width, 3.9 m height; North–South oriented) at the Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences in Chiba University (N 35°53′, E 139°56′) Japan, from July 15 to August 16, 2015. Lettuce (L. sativa L., cv. Romaine) seeds were sown in sponge blocks (W 2.3 cm × D 2.3 cm × H 2.7 cm) on June 24, 2015 and transferred into a germination room (20°C) for 2 days. Following germination, seedlings were transferred into a growth chamber (Nae Terrace, Mitsubishi Plastics Agri Dream Co., Ltd.) under a 12-h photoperiod with 350 ± 10 μmol m-2 s-1 light intensity, 22/18°C day/night temperature, and 1000 ppm CO2 concentration for 19 days. Next, morphologically uniform lettuce seedlings were transferred into the greenhouse, and planted on foam boards floating on containers (volume 90 L, 16 plants per container). Each container was equipped with a water temperature control system and air pump to supply fresh air to the nutrient solution [Otsuka formula (Table )], electrical conductivity (EC): 2.0 ± 0.2 dS m-1, pH: 6.0 ± 1.0. During the cultivation period, the average air temperature was 36.6°C/28.3°C (day/night), average relative humidity was 63.5%, and average daily photosynthetic photo flux density (PPFD) was 561 μmol m-2 s-1 inside greenhouse.

Experimental Design

The RZC and SRP experiments were conducted when the 14th leaf had fully expanded, 7 days after planting. There were four test set treatments: (1) Plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature without SRP, as a control (30°C); (2) Plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature, with SRP (30°C + Spd); (3) Plants cultivated at a 25°C root zone temperature, without SRP (25°C); and (4) A combination of 25°C root zone temperature and SRP (25°C + Spd). The containers were arranged in a 2-way factorial complete block design with three blocks, comprising a total of 12 containers with 192 seedlings in the four treatments (48 seedlings per treatment). The experiment was conducted in the center area of the greenhouse where the environment conditions are relatively uniform. Root zone temperature control was realized using a heater (Ic Auto Neo Type 180, Nisso, Japan) or a cooler (Compact Handy Cooler 202TCN, As One, Japan) in the nutrient solution of each container. According to empirical data for the Tokyo region, the root zone temperature often reaches 30°C in the summer season, and a previous study found 25°C to be the optimal temperature for growth of ‘cv. Romaine’ lettuce (Li et al., 2015). Thus 30°C was selected as the control, and 25°C as the RZC treatment. For SRP, plant roots were soaked in 0.1 mM Spd (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA; 99.9% purity) solution for 15 min, then the liquid was drained on the root surface until there was no dripping, after which the plant roots were planted back to the foam boards. To investigate the direct relationship between Spd and lettuce photosynthesis, six sub-treatments at six different Spd concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mM) were conducted during experimental period. The method was as described above, except for the changed Spd concentrations. The root zone temperature for sub-treatment plants was 30°C. Three plants were randomly selected from each container for gas-exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements at 9:00–11:00 a.m. on 19 days after planting (12 days after treatment), and eight plants were randomly selected from each container for plant growth measurements on 21 days after planting. The measurement of photosynthesis or chlorophyll fluorescence was carried out using intact plants, and parameters were measured on a fully expanded functional leaf at the same position of a plant for each treatment.

Temperature in the Greenhouse, and Root Zone Temperature Measurement

The air temperature inside the greenhouse and root zone temperature under control conditions (30 and 25°C) were recorded using thermo recorders (TR–71wf, T&D, Japan). For the measurement of root zone temperatures, sensors were located 10 cm deep inside the nutrient solution. Temperature data were recorded at 10-min intervals during the experimental period, and daily temperatures were calculated using a 24-h average.

Plant Growth Analyses and Chlorophyll Content Measurement

For determination of fresh weight, the plants were washed with distilled water and weighed after wiping the water off. The number of fully expanded leaves was recorded as leaf number per plant. Leaf area per plant was measured using a Li–3000 leaf area meter (Li–Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaf chlorophyll content was determined using a chlorophyll meter (SPAD–502, Minolta, Osaka, Japan). Samples were oven dried at 70°C until a constant weight was attained, and the dry weight subsequently recorded.

Gas-Exchange Parameter Measurements

The measurement method of Gas-exchange parameters was the same as described previously (Yamori et al., 2011) using a portable photosynthesis system (Li–6400XT, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) between 09:00 and 11:00. Net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) were measured. Light was provided from red and blue light-emitting diodes (6400–02B, Li-Cor Inc.). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was measured at 800 μmol m-2 s-1, and the leaf temperature, CO2 concentration, and relative humidity (RH) were 28 ± 1°C, 400 ± 2 μmol mol-1, and 63 ± 2%, respectively.

Light Response and CO2 Response Curve Measurements

Leaf temperature was set at 25°C, and PPFD settings were 1,600, 1,400, 1,200, 1,000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 150, 100, 50, 25, and 0 μmol photons m-2 s-1. The PN–PPFD curve was plotted using PN data and the corresponding light intensity. When measuring the CO2 response curve, leaf temperature was set at 25°C, and CO2 concentrations were set to 1,200, 1,000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 150, 100, 50, 25, and 0 μmol mol-1, the light intensity was set at 800 μmol m-2 s-1. The PN–Ci curve was then plotted in accordance with the PN data and corresponding CO2 concentration.

The PN–PPFD and PN–Ci curves were fitted with least-squares according to Bassman and Zwier (1991), to obtain light-saturated maximum photosynthetic rate (PNmax), apparent quantum yield (AQY), CO2-saturated maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax), and carboxylation efficiency (CE). PNmax was determined as the maximum net photosynthetic rate at saturation light intensity, AQY was determined as the initial slope of the PN–PPFD curves, Amax determined as the maximum net photosynthetic rate at a saturated CO2 concentration, and CE was determined as the initial slope of the PN–Ci curves.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameter Measurements

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured to evaluate the light absorption, transfer, dissipation, and distribution in the photosystem of lettuce plants treated by RZC or SRP after leaves adaption in light or dark to a stable state. Leaf chlorophyll fluorescences were measured simultaneously using a portable photosynthesis system (Li–6400XT, Li-Cor Inc.) with an integrated fluorescence fluorometer (Li 6400–40 leaf chamber fluorometer, Li-Cor Inc.) under ambient CO2 concentrations and 21% O2. Actinic light supplied by light-emitting diodes (90% red light, 630 nm; 10% blue light, 470 nm) was used to record the steady state chlorophyll fluorescence level (Fs). The minimum chlorophyll fluorescence at the open PSII center (Fo) and maximum chlorophyll fluorescence at the closed PSII center (Fm) were measured after 30 min of dark adaptation. Measurement light (630 nm, 1 μmol m-2 s-1) was used to determine Fo. An 800-ms saturating pulse (>6,000 μmol m-2 s-1) was applied to measure Fm in the dark or during actinic light illumination (F′m). The minimum (F′o) fluorescence of light-adapted leaves was determined in accordance with Kramer et al. (2004), that the actinic light was put out and then the minimal fluorescence level in the light-adapted state was determined by illuminating the leaf with a 3-s far-red light. The maximum quantum yield of the PSII primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) was calculated as (Fm–Fo)/Fm. The quantum yield of PSII electron transport [PhiPSII = (F′m - Fs)/F′m], the efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PSII reaction centers [F′], photochemical quenching [qP = (F′], and non-photochemical quenching [qN = (Fm - F′m)/(Fm - F′o)] were calculated from the measured parameters (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000). The quantum yield of the carboxylation rate (PhiCO2) was calculated as: PhiCO2 = (PN–PNdark)/(I × αleaf; Thwe et al., 2014), where PN is the assimilation rate, PN dark is the dark assimilation rate (μmol m-2 s-1), and α is the initial slope of the light curve at low PPFD.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics Curves and the Fluorescent–CO2 Response Curve Measurements

Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics curves were measured to understand the changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters when the lettuce leaves were suddenly transferred from dark to light, and the fluorescent–CO2 response curves were also measured to clarify the effect of CO2 concentration on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, which would help to understand the changes of PhiPSII, PhiCO2, and qP in lettuce leaves treated with RZC and SRP. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were recorded from the fluorescence light curve and the fluorescence CO2 response curve of light-adapted leaves. Leaf chlorophyll fluorescences were measured simultaneously using a portable photosynthesis system (Li–6400XT, Li-Cor Inc.), with an integrated fluorescence fluorometer (Li 6400–40 leaf chamber fluorometer, Li-Cor Inc.). The fully expanded functional leaf at the same position of each plant was wrapped in foil paper and transferred to a dark place for a 12-h dark adaptation. Operation of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetic auto-measurement program set the Fo and Fm at 547 and 2465, respectively (these values were obtained when measuring chlorophyll fluorescence parameters); the dark respiration rate was set at 0.45, which was obtained from the light response curve measurement. Loop N times and time between flashes were set at 10 times and 3 min, respectively. Saturated light intensity was set to 1,000 μmol m-2 s-1. The PhiPSII and PhiCO2 data were recorded for plotting the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetic curve. For plotting the fluorescent–CO2 response curve, settings were as follows: modulation frequency: 0.25 KHz; duration: 0.8 s; average signal frequency: 1 KHz; flash irradiance: 6,000 μmol m-2 s-1; modulation frequency: 20 KHz; and average signal frequency: 50 KHz. The light-adapted leaf from each treatment used the prior settings [Fo (547), Fm (2465), and dark respiration rate (0.45)] obtained from the control condition. The CO2 concentrations were set at 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 μmol mol-1. PhiPSII and PhiCO2 data under different CO2 concentrations were recorded for plotting the fluorescent–CO2 response curve.

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted using three biological replicates. Eight plants from each replicate were selected for plant growth analyses, and three plants from replicate were selected for determination of gas-exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence. Data were represented as the mean ± standard errors (SE). All data were statistically analyzed with SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) using the Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05 level of significance.

Results

Temperature in the Greenhouse and Root Zone

Air and root zone temperatures during the experimental period are shown in Figure . Diurnal air temperature varied intensely, with natural fluctuation. The highest air temperature reached was 38.6°C and the daily average temperature was 31.1°C. The root zone temperature showed less fluctuation, being relatively stable under temperature control treatments. The average root zone temperature of the control group (with a set point of 30°C) was 31.5°C, and the average temperature for RZC treatment was 25.8°C (with a set point of 25°C), which were within the expected experimental temperature range.

Variation of air temperatures in the greenhouse and root zone temperature during the experimental period (15 July to 16 August 2015). Root zone temperatures were measured for the 30°C treatment and 25°C treatment.

Plant Growth and Chlorophyll Content

Root zone cooling and SRP exerted positive effects on plant growth. Compared with control group plants, RZC increased plant shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total plant fresh weight, and total plant dry weight by 8.9, 20.5, 7.8, 14.3, 9.7, and 8.5%, respectively; total leaf area and leaf number were unchanged (Table ).

Under the control 30°C root zone temperature condition, SRP increased shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, total plant fresh weight, total plant dry weight, total leaf area, and leaf number by 34.1, 46.4, 36.7, 38.5, 34.9, 36.9, 12.1, and 8.1%, respectively, compared with the control group plants (Table ). Under 25°C root zone temperature conditions, SRP also significantly promoted plant growth. However, chlorophyll content (SPAD) was not affected by either RZC or SRP.

Gas-Exchange Parameters

Root zone cooling significantly increased plant leaf net photosynthetic rate (PN; Figure ), stomatal conductance (Gs; Figure ), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci; Figure ), and transpiration rate (Tr; Figure ). SRP significantly increased PN and decreased Ci, whereas no significant effects on Gs and Tr were observed under both root zone temperature conditions (control and RZC).

Effects of root zone cooling (RZC) and exogenous spermidine (Spd) root-pretreatment on Parameters were measured on a fully expanded leaf at the same position for each treatment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. 30°C: control, plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature; 30°C + Spd: plants cultivated at the control root zone temperature with 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment; 25°C: plants cultivated at a 25°C root zone temperature; 25°C + Spd: combined 25°C root zone temperature and 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment.

Light Response Curve and CO2 Response Curve

PN increased with the increase of PPFD, flattening after light intensity had reached 1,000 μmol m-2 s-1, indicating that the light saturation point for lettuce plant is approximately 1,000 μmol m-2 s-1 (Figure ). The PN also increased CO2 concentration, flattening once the CO2 concentration reached 800 μmol mol-1, indicating that the CO2 saturation point for lettuce is approximately 800 μmol mol-1 (Figure ).

Effects of RZC and exogenous spermidine (Spd) root-pretreatment on Parameters were measured on a fully expanded leaf at the same position for each treatment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. 30°C: control, plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature; 30°C + Spd: plants cultivated at the control root zone temperature with 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment; 25°C: plants cultivated at a 25°C root zone temperature; 25°C + Spd: combined 25°C root zone temperature and 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment.

Root zone cooling significantly increased light-saturated maximum photosynthetic rate (PNmax; Figure ) and CO2-saturated maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax; Figure ), by 14.6 and 11.0%, respectively, whereas no significant effect was observed on apparent quantum yield (AQY; Figure ) or carboxylation efficiency (CE; Figure ). Under 30°C root zone temperature conditions (control), SRP significantly increased PNmax, Amax, AQY, and CE by 16.8, 27.3, 15.1, and 9.5%, respectively. Under 25°C root zone temperature conditions, SRP increased PNmax by 26.6%, Amax by 17.2%, AQY by 16.2%, and CE by 29.9%.

Effects of Different Spd Concentrations on Plant Photosynthesis Traits

Photosynthesis traits under different Spd concentrations of root-pretreatment were measured to analyze the direct relationship between Spd and lettuce CO2 assimilation efficiency (Figure ). PN initially increased and then decreased subsequently with the increase in Spd concentrations (Figure ), whereas Ci initially decreased and then increased subsequently with increased Spd concentrations (Figure ); PN was negatively correlated with Ci (r = -0.6955∗, asterisk represents significant difference at 0.05). AQY (Figure ) and CE (Figure ) showed the same trend as seen for PN. Moreover, PN showed significantly positive consistency with changes of CE (r = 0.8994∗∗, asterisks represent significant difference at 0.01), and Ci showed significantly negative consistency with changes of CE (r = -0.8242∗). However, Gs was not affected by Spd concentration (Figure ), and had no significant correlation with PN.

Effects of different exogenous spermidine (Spd) concentrations on Parameters were measured on a fully expanded leaf at the same position for each treatment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3).

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

Root zone cooling significantly increased quantum yield of PSII electron transport (PhiPSII; Figure ), quantum yield of the carboxylation rate (PhiCO2; Figure ), and photochemical quenching (qP; Figure ), but had no effect on maximum quantum yield of the PSII primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm; Figure ), efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PSII reaction centers (F′; Figure ), or non-photochemical quenching (qN; Figure ). Under 30°C and RZC conditions, SRP significantly increased PhiPSII, PhiCO2, and qP, but had no effect on Fv/Fm, F′, or qN.

Effects of RZC and exogenous spermidine (Spd) root-pretreatment on Parameters are measured on a fully expanded leaf at the same position for each treatment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. 30°C: control, plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature; 30°C + Spd: plants cultivated at the control root zone temperature with 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment; 25°C: plants cultivated at a 25°C root zone temperature; 25°C + Spd: combined 25°C root zone temperature and 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics Curves and Fluorescent–CO2 Response Curve

Dynamic changes of qP (Figure ), PhiPSII (Figure ), and PhiCO2 (Figure ) of lettuce plants during 30 min of activated process from dark to light were measured and fluorescent–CO2 response curves plotted (Figures ). The qP, PhiPSII, and PhiCO2 initially increased, and began to flatten out with increased activation time and elevated CO2 concentrations. Both RZC and SRP increased qP, PhiPSII, and PhiCO2 of the lettuce leaf.

Effects of RZC and exogenous spermidine (Spd) root-pretreatment on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics curves Parameters were measured on a fully expanded leaf at the same position for each treatment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3). 30°C: control, plants cultivated at a 30°C root zone temperature; 30°C + Spd: plants cultivated at the control root zone temperature with 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment; 25°C: plants cultivated at a 25°C root zone temperature; 25°C + Spd: combined 25°C root zone temperature and 0.1 mM Spd root-pretreatment.

Discussion

Both RZC and SRP Improved Hydroponic Lettuce Growth during the High Temperature Season

Air and nutrient solution temperatures during the experimental period were both over 30°C (Figure ), this is beyond the optimal temperature for hydroponic ‘cv. Romaine’ lettuce growth (Li et al., 2015), and thus limited plant production. In the present study, lettuce growth was remarkably improved by RZC (Table ), proving the feasibility of cultivating hydroponic lettuce in a high-temperature season through cooling of the nutrient solution. Our results also demonstrated the growth of lettuce could be effectively promoted by application of 0.1 mM Spd (Table ), thus providing a new way to improve hydroponic lettuce growth during the high-temperature season.

RZC and SRP Improved PN of Hydroponic Lettuce Plants in High Temperature Season via Different Mechanisms from Aspect of Gas-Exchange Parameters

Photosynthesis is extremely sensitive to supra-optimal temperatures, which can damage the first metabolic process (Paulsen, 1994). Many factors can cause decreased photosynthesis under biotic stress; possible reasons for this include the following: (1) damaged photosynthetic apparatus (Del Duca et al., 1994; Tiburcio et al., 1994; Borrell et al., 1995; He et al., 2002a; Demetriou et al., 2007); (2) degraded photosynthetic pigments (Aldesuquy et al., 2000; Subhan and Murthy, 2001; Chattopadhayay et al., 2002; Unal et al., 2008; Shu et al., 2011); (3) CO2 was prevented from entering into the mesophyll cell because of stoma closure (Liu et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2010); and (4) carbon assimilation was suppressed (Iqbal and Ashraf, 2005; Zhang et al., 2009; Shu et al., 2011, 2014). Our results showed that RZC improved PN of hydroponic lettuce plants in high temperature season, similar results also found in several other species that photosynthesis were improved when reduced soil temperature (Martin et al., 1989; Udomprasert et al., 1993). However, the chlorophyll content in lettuce leaves was not affected by RZC (Table ) when plants were exposed to a high-temperature season, indicating the integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus and light harvest efficiency were not affected. Therefore, the increased PN by RZC probably due to CO2 supply being improved by stomatal conductance or/and enhancement of CO2 assimilation. According to the determination of stomatal and non-stomatal limitation described by Farquhar and Sharkey (1982), the PN (Figure ), Gs (Figure ), Ci (Figure ), and Tr (Figure ) of lettuce plants in this study were increased by RZC, suggesting the increase of PN was caused by improved stomatal conductance, which enabled sufficient CO2 for photosynthesis. This result agreed with Dodd et al. (2000), who found that when transfer pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants from root zone temperature of 25–40°C to 20°C condition, Gs was increased, and RZC likely improved root hydraulic conductivity independently on water viscosity, alternation in hydraulic conductivity have in turn increased shoot water potential, which is hypothesized to have directly enhanced the stomatal aperture. He et al. (2001) and Zhang et al. (2008) also suggested that changes in photosynthesis induced by root temperatures were mainly attributed to corresponding changes of Gs.

However, the PN of lettuce plants was also significantly increased by SRP when plants were exposed to both the control and RZC, but Ci was decreased, and Gs and Tr were not affected. These results suggest the increase of PN in lettuce plants by SRP correlates to the improvement of CO2 assimilation, rather than to the CO2 supply being enhanced by stomatal conductance. Studies on the effects of PAs on plant photosynthesis in other species showed similar mechanisms: application of Put foliar spray on cucumber plants under salt stress (Zhang et al., 2009), Spd foliar spray on rice plants under drought stress (Farooq et al., 2009), and Spd foliar spray on corn plants under salt stress (Liu et al., 2006), all showed photosynthesis improvements correlated to carboxylic efficiency. However, in those studies, Gs was suppressed by PAs application, which helps to decrease transpiration and enhance water use efficiency of plants under adverse stress conditions (Yuan et al., 2012). In this study, Gs (Figure ) was not affected by SRP, probably because the Spd treatment was conducted on plant roots rather than leaves.

Therefore, the gas-exchange parameter data indicated the mechanisms of PN improvement in lettuce plants between RZC and SRP were different, the former owing to the improvement of CO2 supply, while the latter ascribable to CO2 assimilation enhancement.

Apparent Photosynthetic Parameters from the PN–PPFD and PN–Ci Curves Provided Further Evidence that Improvement Mechanisms of PN were Different between RZC and SRP When Lettuce Plants were Exposed to High Temperature

The PN–PPFD (Figure ) and PN–Ci (Figure ) curves of hydroponic lettuce plants were determined to further understand differences in the mechanisms of PN improvement between RZC and SRP. Apparent photosynthetic parameters, including PNmax (Figure ), Amax (Figure ), AQY (Figure ), and CE (Figure ), were calculated to understand the response of photosynthesis in lettuce plants to the above two treatments. PNmax represents the maximum net photosynthetic rate at saturation light intensity, while Amax represents the maximum net photosynthetic rate at a saturated CO2 concentration, and Amax correlates with the activities of photosynthetic electron transport and phosphorylation (Coste et al., 2005). AQY represents CO2 assimilation or O2 release when a plant absorbs one photon, and CE represents carboxylic efficiency, which positively correlates to Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activity (Reng et al., 2003). The results revealed the PNmax (Figure ) and Amax (Figure ) of lettuce plants were significantly increased by RZC, whereas AQY (Figure ) and CE (Figure ) were not affected, suggesting that PN improvement of plants by RZC correlated with the promotion of photosynthetic electron transport activity and phosphorylation, rather than enhancement of CO2 assimilation efficiency. However, PNmax, Amax, AQY, and CE were all increased by SRP at both 30 and 25°C root zone temperatures, suggesting that PN improvement by SRP not only correlated with promotion of photosynthetic electron transport activity and phosphorylation, but also correlated with enhancement of CO2 assimilation efficiency. Meanwhile, results of different Spd concentrations on PN (Figure ), Ci (Figure ), Gs (Figure ), AQY (Figure ), and CE (Figure ) of lettuce plants further interpreted the mechanism of SRP on photosynthesis improvement. There was a significant negative correlation between PN and Ci, and a positive correlation between PN and CE, whereas no correlation was observed between PN and Gs. These findings provide further evidence that improvement of PN by SRP is due to enhancement of carboxylic efficiency when lettuce plants are exposed to the control and RZC, but is not due to stomatal regulation.

CO2 assimilation of plants is regulated by Rubisco activity and RuBP regeneration (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982; Wise et al., 2004). Rubisco activity is described by CE (Reng et al., 2003), while RuBP regeneration depends on production of ATP and NADPH, which correlate with photosynthetic electron transport and phosphorylation (Coste et al., 2005). Therefore, Amax also reflects RuBP regeneration. In the present study, RZC increased Amax (Figure ) without affecting the CE (Figure ) of lettuce plants, suggesting that the improvement in photosynthesis correlated with increased RuBP regeneration, but not Rubisco activity. Loss of photosynthetic activity at high shoot and leaf temperatures has been related to decreased Rubisco activity (Ruter and Ingram, 1992), which is different from our deduction, probably because the organs affected by temperature were different in the two studies. In this study, SRP increased both the CE (Figure ) and Amax (Figure ) of lettuce plants, suggesting that the photosynthesis improvement correlated with Rubisco activity and RuBP regeneration, and thus improving the photosynthetic rate, which is in accordance with our previous results that CO2 assimilation efficiency of cucumber plants is promoted by Spd via increasing Rubisco activity and RuBP regeneration (Shu et al., 2012, 2014). These results suggested the existence of different mechanisms of PN improvement in lettuce plants between RZC and SRP, the former was independent of Rubisco activity, while the latter owing to the enhancement of Rubisco activity.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis Indicated that Both RZC and SRP Could Promote the Level of the PSII Photochemical Efficiency of Lettuce Plant, Thus Leading to Increase of Photosynthetic Efficiency

The influence of many environmental factors on photosynthesis can be evaluated by chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. In this study, Fv/Fm (Figure ), Fv′/Fm′ (Figure ), and qN (Figure ) were not affected by RZC, similar to that there was no difference in Fv/Fm measured from leaves of lettuce plants grown at both 20°C and hot ambient temperature from 26 to 35 and 28 to 41°C in January and June, respectively (He and Lee, 1998), suggesting that the enhancement of photosynthetic efficiency of lettuce plants was independent of light-harvesting and excessive energy dissipation. It also showed that the integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus was not damaged, which is consistent with the unchanged chlorophyll content (Table ) because the plant chlorophyll content directly relates to photosynthetic apparatus integrity and light-harvesting (Tanaka and Tanaka, 2006). However, RZC increased PhiPSII (Figure ), PhiCO2 (Figure ), and qP (Figure ), suggesting the quantum yield of PSII electron transport, the quantum yield of carboxylation rate, and photochemical quenching in lettuce leaves improved when plants were exposed to a high-temperature season, which according to Zhang et al. (2008), who suggested that cooling root temperatures induced slight changes in PhiPSII and qP of six Cucurbitaceae species. The dynamic changes of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic curves (Figures ) and response curves of fluorescence–CO2 (Figures ) revealed that qP, PhiPSII, and PhiCO2 were also improved by RZC. Calatayud et al. (2008) found that the PhiPSII and qP were higher in rose (Rosa × hybrida cv. Grand Gala) plants grown at cold solution of 10°C than that of 20°C, which meant that the majority of photons absorbed by PSII and used in photochemistry were promoted to increase the level of the photochemical efficiency of PSII. Therefore, RZC could promote quantum yields of both PSII electron transport and carboxylation rates of lettuce plant, leading to increase of photosynthetic efficiency. In this study, SRP did not affect Fv/Fm (Figure ), Fv′/Fm′ (Figure ), and qN (Figure ), but increased PhiPSII (Figures and ), PhiCO2 (Figures and ), and qP (Figures and ), also suggesting that promotion of photosynthesis by SRP was dependent on the level of increase of the photochemical efficiency of PSII, but was independent on light-harvesting and excessive energy dissipation, this is in accordance with the observed photosynthesis improvement by the application of exogenous Put on cucumber plants under salt stress (Zhang et al., 2009; Shu et al., 2011).

Improvement of PN by Combination of RZC and SRP Correlated to Both CO2 Supply and CO2 Assimilation Enhancement

In this study, compared to control (30°C), combination of RZC and SRP improved PN and Gs of lettuce plants, but not affected Ci (Figure ), suggesting improvement of PN correlated to not only CO2 supply being enhanced by stomatal conductance but also CO2 assimilation enhancement, according to the determination of stomatal and non-stomatal limitation described by Farquhar and Sharkey (1982). Furthermore, apparent photosynthetic parameters such as PNmax (Figure ), Amax (Figure ), AQY (Figure ), and CE (Figure ), and chlorophyll fluorescences such as PhiPSII (Figures and ), PhiCO2 (Figures and ), and qP (Figures and ) were all enhanced by combination of RZC and SRP, compared to control and other treatments, suggesting that Rubisco activity, RuBP regeneration and the level of the photochemical efficiency of PSII were promoted, thus leading to increase of photosynthetic efficiency. As a result, plants growth was also promoted the most under combination of RZC and SRP treatment (Table ) when the lettuce plants exposed to high temperature season.

Conclusion

Both RZC and SRP effectively increased hydroponic lettuce plant growth and photosynthetic efficiency, but the mechanisms of photosynthesis improvement were different between the two treatments. The former improved photosynthesis of lettuce plants through increasing stoma conductance to enhance CO2 supply, thereby promoting photosynthetic electron transport activity and phosphorylation, which improved the level of the photochemical efficiency of PSII, rather than enhancing CO2 assimilation efficiency. The latter improved photosynthesis by enhancing CO2 assimilation efficiency, rather than stomatal regulation. Combination of RZC and SRP significantly improved PN of lettuce plants in a high-temperature season not only due to improvement of CO2 supply but also CO2 assimilation enhancement. The enhancement of photosynthetic efficiency in both treatments was independent of altering light-harvesting or excessive energy dissipation.

Author Contributions

We thank the numerous individuals who participated in this research. JS and SG conceived and designed the study. JS, NL, and HX conducted the experiments. TM contributed new reagents and analytical tools. JS and HX analyzed the data. JS and NL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Table 1

Otsuka formula.

Composition	Content (%)	Composition	Content (%)
N	21.0	Fe	0.18
P2O5	8.0	Cu	0.002
K2O	27	Zn	0.006
MgO	4.0	Mo	0.002
MnO	0.10
B2O3	0.10
CaO	23.0

Table 2

Effects of root zone cooling (RZC) and exogenous Spd root-pretreatment on lettuce plant growth and chlorophyll content.

Treatment	Shoots fresh weight (g)	Roots fresh weight (g)	Shoots dry weight (g)	Roots dry weight (g)	Total fresh weight (g)	Total dry weight (g)	Leaf area (cm2)	Leaf number per plant	SPAD
30°C	108.45 ± 6.76c	8.33 ± 0.73c	4.11 ± 0.06d	0.54 ± 0.03c	116.78 ± 7.89c	4.65 ± 0.16c	2014.24 ± 23.94c	20.7 ± 0.85b	41.8 ± 1.77a
30°C + Spd	145.37 ± 4.25a	12.20 ± 0.42a	5.62 ± 0.43a	0.74 ± 0.07a	157.57 ± 4.67a	6.37 ± 0.50a	2258.68 ± 115.53b	22.3 ± 1.22a	44.3 ± 3.21a
25°C	118.06 ± 3.54b	10.04 ± 0.62b	4.43 ± 0.14c	0.61 ± 0.03b	128.10 ± 5.16b	5.05 ± 0.38b	2048.21 ± 35.04c	21.3 ± 1.04ab	42.5 ± 2.15a
25°C + Spd	141.87 ± 4.30a	12.51 ± 0.54a	5.00 ± 0.11b	0.70 ± 0.02a	154.38 ± 4.84a	5.69 ± 0.18a	2483.02 ± 73.22a	23.0 ± 2.11a	45.3 ± 2.09a