| Literature DB >> 27047511 |
Feifei Zhai1, Jinmei Mao2, Junxiang Liu1, Xiangyong Peng1, Lei Han1, Zhenyuan Sun1.
Abstract
Dioecy distributed in 157 flowering plant families and 959 flowering plant genera. Morphological and physiological differences between male and female plants have been studied extensively, but studies of sex-specific genetic diversity are relatively scarce in dioecious plants. In this study, 20 SSR loci were employed to examine the genetic variance of male subpopulations and female subpopulations in Salix viminalis. The results showed that all of the markers were polymorphic (Na = 14.15, He = 0.7566) and workable to reveal the genetic diversity of S. viminalis. No statistically significant difference was detected between male and female subpopulations, but the average genetic diversity of male subpopulations (Na = 7.12, He = 0.7071) and female subpopulations (Na = 7.31, He = 0.7226) were high. Under unfavorable environments (West Liao basin), the genetic diversity between male and female subpopulations was still not significantly different, but the genetic diversity of sexual subpopulations were lower. The differentiation of the ten subpopulations in S. viminalis was moderate (FST = 0.0858), which was conformed by AMOVA that most of genetic variance (94%) existed within subpopulations. Pairwise FST indicated no differentiation between sexual subpopulations, which was accompanied by high long-term migrate between them (M = 0.73~1.26). However, little recent migration was found between sexual subpopulations. Therefore, artificial crossing or/and transplantation by cutting propagation should be carried out so as to increase the migration during the process of ex situ conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Salix viminalis; dioecy; genetic differentiation; genetic diversity; migration rate
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047511 PMCID: PMC4796010 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Assignment of . Pie chart sizes show the sample size of each subpopulation. Pie charts represent probability of each subpopulation belonging to each of the two clusters. Ergun cluster was shown in red color, while West Liao cluster was shown in green color.
Sampling locations of .
| GH | Genhe | Ergun | 50°46′06.61″ | 121°30′09.28″ | 706 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| TL | Tuli | Ergun | 50°29′29.73″ | 121°41′11.19″ | 734 | 15 | 15 | 16 |
| KDE | Kuduer | Ergun | 50°02′44.80″ | 121°40′55.25″ | 848 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
| ZD | Zhadun | Ergun | 49°20′03.84″ | 120°40′30.80″ | 649 | 14 | 14 | 3 |
| DHQ | Dahaiqing | West Liao | 44°14′48.34″ | 118°20′17.48″ | 1162 | 15 | 15 | 11 |
Genetic diversity of male and female subpopulations in .
| Male | DHQM | 5.3000 | 2.8265 | 1.1308 | 0.5500 | 0.5692 | −0.0009 | 0 |
| GHM | 7.7000 | 4.8264 | 1.5957 | 0.6500 | 0.7313 | 0.0672 | 2 | |
| KDEM | 7.0500 | 4.4878 | 1.5578 | 0.7115 | 0.7448 | −0.0015 | 2 | |
| TLM | 8.1500 | 4.9704 | 1.6586 | 0.6333 | 0.7572 | 0.1296 | 7 | |
| ZDM | 7.4000 | 4.1888 | 1.5666 | 0.7000 | 0.7331 | 0.0026 | 0 | |
| Mean | 7.1200 | 4.2600 | 1.5019 | 0.6490 | 0.7071 | 0.0394 | 2.20 | |
| Female | DHQF | 5.3000 | 2.7157 | 1.1555 | 0.5900 | 0.5862 | −0.0560 | 1 |
| GHF | 7.8000 | 5.0060 | 1.6426 | 0.6567 | 0.7547 | 0.0829 | 3 | |
| KDEF | 7.5500 | 5.0398 | 1.6737 | 0.7308 | 0.7792 | 0.0279 | 3 | |
| TLF | 8.7000 | 5.5911 | 1.7486 | 0.6800 | 0.7722 | 0.0786 | 5 | |
| ZDF | 7.2000 | 3.9698 | 1.5220 | 0.6607 | 0.7206 | 0.0561 | 5 | |
| Mean | 7.3100 | 4.4645 | 1.5485 | 0.6636 | 0.7226 | 0.0379 | 3.40 |
Na, Number of observed alleles; Ne,Number of effective alleles; I, Shannon's information index; Ho,Observed heterozygosity; He,Expected heterozygosity; FIS,Inbreeding coefficient among individuals within subpopulation; Np, Number of private alleles.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of ten subpopulations in .
| Among subpopulations | 9 | 188.498 | 20.944 | 0.458 | 6 |
| Within subpopulations | 278 | 1983.033 | 14.311 | 7.156 | 94 |
| Between basins | 1 | 99.243 | 99.243 | 0.926 | 11 |
| Among subpopulations within basins | 8 | 89.255 | 11.157 | 0.118 | 1 |
| Within subpopulations | 278 | 1983.033 | 14.311 | 7.156 | 87 |
Figure 2Graphical representation for results of the migrations estimated using MIGATE-N among two basins. Maximum-likelihood estimates and 95% confidence intervals (in parentheses) of the long-term migration rate (M) and mutation-scaled effective population size (θ) are shown.