| Literature DB >> 27047199 |
A K Sharma1, P S Dhaliwal1, C S Randhawa1.
Abstract
AIM: To study epidemiology of forestomach (reticuloruminal, omasal, and abomasal) disorders in cattle and buffaloes.Entities:
Keywords: abomaso duodenal ulcerations; diaphragmatic hernia; forestomach; incidence; reticulum; rumen; traumatic reticuloperitonitis
Year: 2015 PMID: 27047199 PMCID: PMC4774773 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1063-1067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Seasonal distribution, species differences and feeding practices in functional forestomach disorders.
| Groups | DH (24) (%) | TRP (19) (%) | VI (31) (%) | AP (18) (%) | FEP (16) (%) | RA (11) (%) | Impaction (7) (%) | ADU (12) (%) | Overall (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November-March | 16.66 | 5.27 | 16.13 | 5.55 | 18.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| April-June | 29.16 | 52.63 | 32.25 | 27.78 | 25 | 27.27 | 57.15 | 25 | 33.33 |
| July-October | 54.16 | 42.10 | 51.61 | 66.67 | 56.25 | 72.73 | 42.85 | 75 | 56.52 |
| Prevalence | 17.4 | 13.8 | 22.5 | 13 | 11.6 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 8.7 | - |
| Buffalo | 95.83 | 63.15 | 74.19 | 77.77 | 68.75 | 100 | 85.71 | 45.45 | 77 |
| Cattle | 4.17 | 36.84 | 15.81 | 22.22 | 31.25 | 0 | 14.29 | 55.55 | 23 |
| Female | 100 | 94.73 | 96.77 | 94.44 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 98 |
| Male | 0 | 5.27 | 3.23 | 5.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Green fodder | 95.83 | 78.94 | 93.54 | 100 | 87.5 | 100 | 42.85 | 83.33 | 87.7 |
| Concentrate feeding | 62.5 | 84.21 | 74.19 | 72.22 | 87.5 | 60 | 85.71 | 75 | 74.45 |
| Reaper wheat straw | 12.5 | 21.06 | 16.13 | 16.67 | 6.25 | 9.10 | 28.58 | 16.67 | 15.33 |
| Peg tied/semi-loose system | 100 | 100 | 96.67 | 94.45 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 97.93 |
| Range system (%) | 0 | 0 | 3.23 | 5.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.17 |
DH=Diaphragmatic hernia, TRP=Traumatic reticuloperitonitis, VI=Vagus ingestion, AP=Adhesive peritonitis, FEP=Frank exudative peritonitis, RA=Reticular abscess, ADU=Abomasoduodenal ulceration
Variations in the age, reproductive stage and case presentation of different functional forestomach disorders.
| Groups | Age (mean±SD) | Parity | Gestation (months) | Recent parturition (mean±SD) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heifer (%) | 1st (%) | 2nd (%) | 3rd (%) | 4th (%) | 5th (%) | >5th (%) | Mean±SD | 4-5 (%) | 6-8 (%) | >8 (%) | Mean±SD | |||
| DH (24) | 7.38±3.01 | 8.33 | 25 | 20.83 | 16.67 | 16.67 | 8.33 | 4.16 | 2.50±1.64 | 12.5 | 29.17 | 25 | 4.96±3.90 | 0.21±0.42 |
| TRP (19) | 6.34±2.99 | 6.66 | 40 | 20 | 33.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.42±1.17 | 11.76 | 29.41 | 17.64 | 3.79±3.94 | 0.32±0.48 |
| VI (31) | 6.71±3.29 | 19.23 | 19.23 | 26.92 | 23.07 | 3.84 | 7.69 | 0 | 1.65±1.52 | 10 | 23.33 | 23.33 | 4.42±4.49 | 0.23±0.50 |
| AP (18) | 8.05±4.12 | 0 | 31.25 | 6.25 | 31.25 | 25 | 0 | 6.25 | 2.79±2.15 | 11.76 | 58.82 | 5.88 | 4.53±3.52 | 0.21±0.42 |
| FEP (16) | 7.00±2.31 | 0 | 23.07 | 30.76 | 23.07 | 23.07 | 0 | 0 | 2.00±1.41 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 0 | 0.63±1.86 | 0.44±0.51 |
| RA (11) | 5.14±2.25 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.18±1.17 | 18.18 | 36.36 | 18.18 | 5.09±3.67 | 0.00±0.00 |
| Impaction (7) | 11.71±3.30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.66 | 33.32 | 33.32 | 16.66 | 2.29±2.87 | 14.29 | 71.42 | 0 | 5.86±2.85 | 0.00±0.00 |
| ADU (12) | 7.73±4.61 | 16.67 | 25 | 8.33 | 8.33 | 16.67 | 8.33 | 16.67 | 2.33±2.55 | 25 | 21.67 | 0 | 4.40±3.80 | 0.33±0.82 |
| F ratio | 2.902 | 1.703 | 2.557 | 1.168 | ||||||||||
| p value | 0.007 | 0.113 | 0.017 | 0.325 | ||||||||||
DH=Diaphragmatic hernia, TRP=Traumatic reticuloperitonitis, VI=Vagus ingestion, AP=Adhesive peritonitis, FEP=Frank exudative peritonitis, RA=Reticular abscess, SD=Standard deviation