| Literature DB >> 27047192 |
K Rajkumar1, R Bhar1, A Kannan1, R V Jadhav1, Birbal Singh1, And G Mal1.
Abstract
AIM: A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of replacing oat fodder (OF) with fresh oak leaves (FOL) or chopped oak leaves (COL) on rumen fermentation and digestibility through in vitro gas production technique (IVGPT).Entities:
Keywords: chopping; in-vitro; methane; oak leaves; oat fodder
Year: 2015 PMID: 27047192 PMCID: PMC4774757 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1021-1026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Chemical composition of OF and oak leaves (% DMB).
| Substrate component | Chemical composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | EE | NDF | ADF | ADL | TA | |
| OF | 14.70a±0.13 | 3.66c±0.12 | 61.52c±0.11 | 35.04c±0.17 | 3.33c±0.07 | 11.60a±0.12 |
| FOL | 10.45c±0.09 | 4.83a±0.11 | 66.50b±0.12 | 50.16b±0.10 | 25.43b±0.11 | 4.07b±0.13 |
| COL | 10.87b±0.10 | 4.37b±0.06 | 69.77a±0.11 | 52.10a±0.18 | 26.10a±0.10 | 4.33b±0.11 |
*Mean of six samples each, means bearing different superscripts (a, b and c) in a column differ significantly (p<0.01), CP=Crude protein, EE=Ether extract, NDF=Neutral detergent fibre, ADF=Acid detergent fiber, ADL=Acid detergent lignin, TA=Total ash, OF=Oat fodder
Polyphenol profile of OF and oak leaves (% DMB).
| Substrate component | Polyphenol profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | NTP | TT | CT | HT | |
| OF | 1.20c±0.09 | 0.46b±0.03 | 0.74c±0.01 | 0.01c±0.00 | 0.73c±0.01 |
| FOL | 6.93a±0.08 | 0.53a±0.02 | 6.41a±0.06 | 1.28a±0.02 | 5.13a±0.04 |
| COL | 6.23b±0.06 | 0.48b±0.01 | 5.75b±0.06 | 1.19b±0.03 | 4.56b±0.04 |
*Mean of six samples each, means bearing different superscripts (a, b and c) in a column differ significantly (p<0.01), TP=Total phenol, NTP=Non-tannin phenol, TT=Total tannin, CT=Condensed Tannin, HT=Hydrolysable tannin, OF=Oat fodder, COL=Chopped oak leaves, FOL=Fresh oak leaves
Graph-1Total gas (ml/200 mg dry matter).
Graph-2Methane production (ml/200 mg dry matter).
Graph-3Effect of replacing oat fodder with fresh or chopped oak leaves on in vitro digestibility.
Effect of OF and oak leaves at various combinations on in vitro gas production and rumen fermentation.
| Combination | Microbial protein (mg) | Ammonia nitrogen (mg/30 ml) | Protozoa (×104)/ml | ME (MJ/kg DM) | Methane ml/200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oat (100%) | 164.69a | 6.60a | 1.74ab | 7.89a | 16.90a |
| OF+FOL | |||||
| Oat (75%)+oak (25%) | 155.22ab | 6.20b | 1.85ab | 7.03c | 16.02a |
| Oat (50%)+oak (50%) | 143.37bc | 5.13e | 2.37a | 6.07e | 12.76b |
| Oat (25%)+oak (75%) | 133.06c | 5.23de | 2.11a | 5.07f | 8.31d |
| Oat (0%)+oak (100%) | 133.14c | 5.23de | 1.56ab | 4.09g | 5.52e |
| OF+COL | |||||
| Oat (75%)+oak (25%) | 156.19ab | 5.60c | 1.59ab | 7.34b | 13.31b |
| Oat (50%)+oak (50%) | 138.83c | 5.47cd | 1.89ab | 6.41d | 10.49c |
| Oat (25%)+oak (75%) | 144.30bc | 5.10e | 2.18a | 5.09f | 5.94e |
| Oat (0%)+oak (100%) | 144.40bc | 4.70f | 1.22a | 4.00g | 3.70e |
| SEM | 2.36 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| p significance | p<0.01 | p<0.01 | NS | p<0.01 | p<0.01 |
*Mean of six samples each, Means bearing different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e, f and g) in a column differ significantly (p<0.01), OF=Oat fodder, SEM=Standard error of means, DM=Dry matter, COL=Chopped oak leaves, FOL=Fresh oak leaves, ME=Metabolizable energy