| Literature DB >> 27047012 |
M Konto1, G I Fufa2, A Zakaria2, S M Tukur1, M Watanabe2, S D Ola-Fadunsin2, M S Khan3, Y M Shettima4, S M A Babjee2.
Abstract
AIM: The red jungle fowl is generally considered as one of the endangered Asian wild Galleopheasants due to man-made encroachment of their habitats, coupled with the effect of disease and disease causing organisms like ticks and tick-borne infections. This study aimed to determine the tick fauna of the red jungle fowl and their predilection sites based on developmental stages.Entities:
Keywords: Bangi; Malaysia; red jungle fowl; tick fauna
Year: 2015 PMID: 27047012 PMCID: PMC4774650 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1167-1171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1(a) Male Gallus gallus gallus, (b) female G. gallus gallus.
Figure-2(a) Male Gallus gallus spadiceus, (b) female G. gallus spadiceus.
Figure-3Photomicrograph of Bangi (sampling location).
Figure-4Prevalence of tick infestation in the red jungle fowl.
Figure-5(a) Dorsal view of Haemaphysalis wellingtoni, (b) ventral view of H. wellingtoni.
The prevalence and distribution of ticks on the jungle fowls based on sex and age.
| Category | Animals infected (n=30) | Predilection site (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comb | Ear | Wattle | Face | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | - |
| Female | 24 | 4 | 18 | 10 | 2 |
| Age | |||||
| Young | 2 | - | 2 | - | - |
| Adult | 28 | 6 | 18 | 14 | - |
The distribution of ticks based on developmental stages of their lifecycle.
| Category | Number of ticks collected (%) | Predilection sites (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comb | Ear | Wattle | Face | ||
| Total number of ticks | 188 (100) | 24 (13)a | 118 (63)b | 44 (23)a | 2 (1)a |
| Developmental stage | |||||
| Adult | 66 (35) | ||||
| Male | 32 (17) | 4 | 6 | 28 | - |
| Female | 34 (18) | 4 | 20 | 10 | - |
| Nymph | 50 (27) | 16 | 26 | 6 | 2 |
| Larvae | 72 (38) | - | 62 | - | - |
Row values with different superscripts for total number of ticks collected between the predilection sites differs significantly with others (p<0.1)