Literature DB >> 27046963

Chemical Shift Artifact on Steady-State MRI Sequences for Detection of Vesical Wall Invasion in Placenta Percreta.

Ishan Kumar1, Ashish Verma1, Shivi Jain1, Madhu Jain2, R C Shukla1, Arvind Srivastava1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antenatal diagnosis of the invasiveness of a placenta percreta helps in planning the surgical approach, reducing blood loss and morbidity. Doppler sonography is the mainstay diagnostic modality with a sensitivity of 80-95 %. With the advent of high magnetic field MRI techniques, there has been recent interest in evaluation of placenta by MRI. On an extensive PUBMED search, we could not find any citations describing imaging, ultrasound, or MRI features to evaluate vesical wall invasion by placenta percreta.
PURPOSE: We attempt to evaluate transmyometrial vesical wall invasion by placenta percreta using chemical shift artifact as a marker of intact bladder-myometrial interface on steady-state MRI sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study, conducted at a university hospital. We have compiled clinico-radiological criteria for diagnosis of invasive placentae based on the existing body of evidences, in four patients. We further go on to analyze a specific proposed sign on a newly introduced MR imaging sequence i.e., loss of chemical shift artifact (India ink line) on steady-state GRE sequence (TrueFISP), to diagnose transmyometrial vesical invasion in placenta percreta.
RESULTS: Though the sample size is small, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of the proposed sign for the purpose was 100 %. CONCLUSIONSS: Loss of chemical shift artifact (India ink line) on steady-state GRE sequences at the vesico-myometrial junction in case of invasive placentae confirms vesical wall invasion, a prospective diagnoses of which can help in planning the surgical protocol and preventing potentially fatal blood loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical shift artifact; Placenta percreta; Placental MRI; Steady-state sequences

Year:  2015        PMID: 27046963      PMCID: PMC4818831          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0660-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited.

Authors:  M N Hood; V B Ho; J G Smirniotopoulos; J Szumowski
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control.

Authors:  Jiachen Zhuo; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion.

Authors:  Allison Lax; Martin R Prince; Kevin W Mennitt; J Reid Schwebach; Nancy E Budorick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask.

Authors:  Richard Bitar; General Leung; Richard Perng; Sameh Tadros; Alan R Moody; Josee Sarrazin; Caitlin McGregor; Monique Christakis; Sean Symons; Andrew Nelson; Timothy P Roberts
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of placental adhesive disorders: correlation with color Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Roberto Brunelli; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Maria Grazia Piccioni; Maurizio Anceschi; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Govind B Chavhan; Paul S Babyn; Bhavin G Jankharia; Hai-Ling M Cheng; Manohar M Shroff
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas.

Authors:  Gary M Israel; Nicole Hindman; Elizabeth Hecht; Glenn Krinsky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  MRI appearance of placenta percreta and placenta accreta.

Authors:  C Maldjian; R Adam; M Pelosi; M Pelosi; R D Rudelli; J Maldjian
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa accreta with power amplitude ultrasonic angiography.

Authors:  M M Chou; E S Ho
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Bonnie K Dwyer; Victoria Belogolovkin; Lan Tran; Anjali Rao; Ian Carroll; Richard Barth; Usha Chitkara
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.