Elaine S Scott1, Lyn Stankiewicz Murphy, Nora E Warshawsky. 1. Author Affiliations: Associate Professor (Dr Scott), College of Nursing, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Associate Professor (Dr Murphy), School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore; Assistant Professor (Dr Warshawsky), School of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the priorities for nursing administration research (NAR) in the United States. BACKGROUND: Previously known as the Council of Graduate Educators in Administrative Nursing, CGEAN provides an avenue for researchers and educators focused on NAR to partner, dialogue, obtain funding resources, and present their findings at a biennial International Nursing Administration Research Conference (INARC). In late 2013, with a goal of building consensus, CGEAN convened an INARC postconference to initiate the process of establishing critical NAR priorities for the future. METHODS: Data from a 3-staged Delphi study were used to identify relevant research topics and determine administrative research priorities. RESULTS: Eight final categories of NAR were determined. CONCLUSIONS: This study found economic valuing of nursing and designing effective future healthcare delivery systems to be high priorities for NAR.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the priorities for nursing administration research (NAR) in the United States. BACKGROUND: Previously known as the Council of Graduate Educators in Administrative Nursing, CGEAN provides an avenue for researchers and educators focused on NAR to partner, dialogue, obtain funding resources, and present their findings at a biennial International Nursing Administration Research Conference (INARC). In late 2013, with a goal of building consensus, CGEAN convened an INARC postconference to initiate the process of establishing critical NAR priorities for the future. METHODS: Data from a 3-staged Delphi study were used to identify relevant research topics and determine administrative research priorities. RESULTS: Eight final categories of NAR were determined. CONCLUSIONS: This study found economic valuing of nursing and designing effective future healthcare delivery systems to be high priorities for NAR.
Authors: Alberto González-García; Ana Díez-Fernández; Noelia Martín-Espinosa; Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa; Rubén Mirón-González; Montserrat Solera-Martínez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390