| Literature DB >> 27046167 |
Yi-Ran Cai1, Yu-Jie Dong1, Hong-Bo Wu2, Zi-Chen Liu1, Li-Juan Zhou1, Dan Su1, Xue-Jing Chen1, Li Zhang1, Ying-Li Zhao1.
Abstract
The micropapillary (MP) subtype has recently been established to be a distinct marker of poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinomas (LACs). According to the 2015 WHO classification system, LAC constituents are required to be precisely reported. T790M mutation and an insertion in exon 20 (E20ins) are associated with EGFR-TKI resistance. A total of 211 LAC patients were involved in this study, and EGFR mutations were determined using an amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Sex, smoking history, lymph node status, and clinical stage differed significantly between the EGFR wild type and mutant groups (p < 0.05). The EGFR mutation occurred more frequently in female, non-smokers, ACs with papillary (85.7%) or MP components (91.4%) (p < 0.001). Twenty ACs with naïve T790M or E20ins were microdissected. The AC constituents metastasizing to lymph nodes exhibited a phenotype and EGFR status that was consistent with the primary loci constituents. Glomerulus-like solid components exhibited the same EGFR status as the surrounding T790M-mutated MP components. The MP and glomerulus-like portions in AC tumours exhibited a congenial EGFR status, but the acinar cells with papillary cells were heterogeneous. The naïve T790M mutants, although minor in the MP component, dramatically increased after EGFR-TKI therapy and indicate that the MP components feature intrinsic heterogeneity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27046167 PMCID: PMC4820702 DOI: 10.1038/srep23755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Exon 19 status of the EGFR gene was screened using high-resolution melting curves in the primary and metastasized tumours of a ‘mixed’ AC.
The ‘mixed’ AC was composed of micropapillary (black arrow) and acinar (red arrow) patterns in the primary locus (a, ×200), whereas only acinar cells occupied the metastasized lymph node and destroyed its normal structure (b, ×40). An HRM analysis of the EGFR status shows that the primary lesion curve (black arrow) exhibited a different character compared with a metastasized tumour (green arrow) and peripheral normal tissue (blue arrow)(c).
Clinicopathological characteristics and EGFR status in 211 AC patients.
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | Wild type (%) | Mutation (%) | Sensitive mutation (deletion in exon 19 or L858R) (%) | Naïve TKI-resistant mutation (E20 ins & T790M) (%) | Other mutations (G719X, L861Q) (%) | ||
| Gender | Female | 22 (20.2) | 87 (79.8) | 0.0002 | 71 (65.1) | 14 (12.8) | 2 (1.8) |
| Male | 45 (44.1) | 57 (55.9) | 47 (46.1) | 6 (5.9) | 4 (3.9) | ||
| Smoking history | Smoked | 36 (52.2) | 33 (47.8) | <0.001 | 28 (40.6) | 4 (5.8) | 1 (1.4) |
| Never smoked | 32 (22.5) | 110 (77.5) | 89 (63.4) | 16 (11.3) | 5 (3.5) | ||
| Clinical stage | I + II | 38 (43.2) | 50 (56.8) | 0.001 | 37 (42.1) | 12 (13.6) | 1 (1.1) |
| IIIa | 15 (18.1) | 68 (81.9) | 59 (71.2) | 5 (6) | 4 (4.8) | ||
| IIIb + IV | 15 (37.5) | 25 (62.5) | 22 (55) | 3 (7.5) | 1 (2.5) | ||
| Histological components | with MP | 5 (8.6) | 53 (91.4) | <0.001 | 46 (79.4) | 5 (8.6) | 2 (3.4) |
| without MP | 62 (40.5) | 91 (59.5) | 72 (47.1) | 15 (9.8) | 4 (2.6) | ||
| with papillary | 14 (14.3) | 84 (85.7) | <0.001 | 68 (69.4) | 12 (12.2) | 4 (4.1) | |
| without papillary | 53 (46.9) | 60 (53.1) | 50 (44.3) | 8 (7) | 2 (1.8) | ||
| LN invasion | Yes | 36 (26.7) | 99 (73.3) | 0.034 | 85 (62.9) | 10 (7.4) | 4 (3) |
| No | 31 (40.8) | 45 (59.2) | 33 (43.4) | 10 (13.2) | 2 (2.6) | ||
MP, micropapillary. LN, lymph node. E20ins, insertions in exon 20 of the EGFR gene.
Histological components and naïve EGFR-TKI resistant mutations in primary and metastasized tumours.
| Patient No. | TNM/Clinical stage | Histological components and | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histological components in primary loci | Histological components in LNs | Histological patterns in primary loci ( | Histological patterns in metastasized locus (Mutation type) | ||||
| 6 | T1N2 M0/IIIA | 80% solid, 20% acinar | Solid and acinar | E20 ins | solid (E20 ins), acinar (E20 ins) | solid (E20 ins), acinar (E20 ins) | |
| 11 | T1N1 M0/II | 100% MP | MP | L858R & T790M | MP (L858R & T790M) | MP (L858R & T790M) | |
| 50 | T2aN2 M0/IIIA | 90% papillary, 10% lepidic | – | Del in E19 & T790M | Papillary and lepidic (Del in E19 & T790M) | – | |
| 52 | T4N2 M0/IIIB | 70% acinar, 30% papillary | papillary | Del in E19 & T790M | Papillary (Del in E19 & T790M); acinar (WT) | Papillary (Del in E19 & T790M) | |
| 55 | T2aN2 M0/IIIA | 60% papillary, 40% acinar | papillary | E20 ins | Papillary (WT); acinar (E20 ins) | Papillary (WT) | |
| 71 | T2bN0 M0/IIA | 95% papillary, 5% MP | – | Del in E19 & T790M | Papillary (Del in E19 & T790M); MP (Del in E19 & T790M) | – | |
| 72 | T2N1 M1/IV | 100% papillary | papillary | E20 ins | Papillary (E20 ins) | Papillary (E20 ins) | |
| 93 | T3N2 M0/IIIA | 80% solid, 20% acinar | solid, acinar | E20 ins | Solid (E20 ins); acinar (E20 ins) | Solid (E20 ins); acinar (E20 ins) | |
| 112 | T1aN1M0/IIA | 80% solid, 20% MP | solid | L858R & T790M | Solid (L858R & T790M); MP (L858R & T790M) | Solid (L858R & T790M) | |
| 120 | T1aN0 M0/IA | 70% papillary, 30% MP | – | L858R & T790M | Papillary (L858R & T790M); MP (L858R & T790M) | – | |
| 144 | T1bN1M0/IIA | 40% acinar, 60% papillary | papillary | L858R & T790M | Acinar (WT); papillary (L858R & T790M) | Papillary (L858R & T790M) | |
| 150 | T2aN2 M0/IIIA | 60% solid, 40% acinar | Solid, acinar | Del in E19 & T790M | Solid and acinar (Del in E19&T790M) | Solid and acinar (Del in E19 & T790M) | |
| 154 | T1bN1 M0/IIA | 60% solid, 40% MP | MP | L858R & T790M | Solid (L858R & T790M); MP (L858R & T790M) | MP (L858R & T790M) | |
| 160 | T2N2 M1/IV | 70% papillary, 30% acinar | papillary | Del in E19 & T790M | Papillary (Del in E19& T790M); acinar (WT) | Papillary (Del in E19 & T790M) | |
| 166 | T1bN0 M0/IA | 70% solid, 20% acinar, 10% papillary | – | L858R & T790M | Solid and papillary (L858R & T790M); acinar (WT) | – | |
| 171 | T1aN0 M0/IA | lepidic | – | E20 ins | Lepidic (E20 ins) | – | |
| 174 | T2aN0 M0/IB | 60% acinar, 30% papillary, 10% solid | – | Del in E19&E20 ins | Acinar (E20 ins); papillary & solid (Del in E19) | – | |
| 194 | T1bN0 M0/IA | 40% papillary, 30% acinar, 30% lepidic | – | L858R & T790M | Papillary & lepidic (L858R & T790M); acinar (WT) | – | |
| 197 | T1bN0 M0/IA | 60% papillary, 40% lepidic | – | Del in E19 & T790M | Papillary & lepidic (Del in E19 & T790M) | – | |
| 199 | T1bN1 M0/IIA | 100% MP | MP | Del in exon19 & T790M | MP (Del in E19 & T790M) | MP (Dele in E19 & T790M) | |
| 202 | T2bN2 M0/IIIA | 95% acinar, 5% papillary | acinar | L858R & T790M | Acinar (L858R & T790M); papillary (L858R & T790M) | Acinar (L858R & T790M) | |
*patients with a discrepant EGFR status in the primary loci; E20 ins, insertion in exon 20; Del in E19, deletion in exon 19; MP, micropapillary; LN, lymph node; –, not metastasized or tissue unavailable from patient* #50; WT, wild type; #patient was not involved for further analysis.
Figure 2Different histological portions of an adenocarcinoma consisting of micropapillary and solid components (patient No 154) were laser microdissected, and EGFR mutants were determined using ARMS.
In the micropapillary portion, small clusters of glandular cells lacking fibrovascular cores grow within an airspace covered by cancer cells (a) and the EGFR status of the tumour mass was demonstrated using L858R (yellow curve) and T790M (green curve) mutations (b). Micropapillary cells were separated by laser microdissection (c), and L858R and T790M were found together (d). In the solid area, malignant cells are woven in tufts as a glomerulus-like pattern (red arrow), and the tumour cells are crowded in a solid or plate structure (e) and were captured using LMD (f). The EGFR mutation status was the same as that of the micropapillary cells (g).
Figure 3An adenocarcinoma composed of papillary and acinar components (patient No. 144) was laser microdissected, and the EGFR mutations were investigated in different histological components.
Cuboidal to columnar cells grow in a layer along fibrovascular cores with papillary pattern. (a) Tumour cells were captured (b) and we determined their composite L858R (yellow curve) and T790M (green curve) mutations (c). Acinar cells did not exhibit the same shape as papillary cells but a glandular pattern (d). Laser-captured cells (e) also featured a wild-type EGFR status, which differed from the papillary cells (f).
Figure 4A patient was used as an example to clarify the heterogeneity of the micropapillary AC.
A tumour mass was present in the inferior lobe of the right lung, which was determined using computed tomography (a) and the histological type was a pure micropapillary type (b). An ARMS analysis of the EGFR status showed a deletion in exon 19 (red curve) and a minor naïve T790M mutation (green curve) (c). Conspicuous inhibition was observed using computer tomography after 9 months of EGFR TKI therapy (d). However, progression of the tumour was observed after 11 months of therapy (e) one more biopsy was performed, and the histological type remained the micropapillary type but with poorer differentiation (f). The T790M mutant had clearly increased in the micropapillary tissue (green curve) (g).