Literature DB >> 27046122

Differences in Relationship Between Macular Inner Retinal Layer Thickness and Retinal Sensitivity in Eyes With Early and Progressed Glaucoma.

Makoto Araie1, Hiroshi Murata2, Aiko Iwase3, Masanori Hangai4, Kazuhisa Sugiyama5, Nagahisa Yoshimura6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the relationship between retinal sensitivity and macular inner retinal layer thickness differs between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with mild and advanced central visual field (VF) damage.
METHODS: One eye of 153 POAG patients was included. Using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, we measured the average thickness of the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layers (GCIPLT) and the macular nerve fiber layer/GCIPL (ganglion cell complex [GCCT]) in a 0.9-mm-diameter ganglion cell displacement-adjusted circular area corresponding to the four central test points of the Humphrey Perimeter 24-2 program and correlated the results with the average retinal sensitivity (1/Lambert) at the corresponding test points, with adjustment for other confounding factors.
RESULTS: Ninety-three eyes had mild central and 60 eyes advanced central VF damage with an average total deviation (TD) of the four test points of greater than or equal to -4 decibels (dB) (mild group) and less than -4 dB (more severe group), respectively; the average mean deviations were -3.0 and -9.8 dB, respectively. In the mild group, the GCCT and GCIPLT were correlated significantly and positively with the average retinal sensitivity with partial regression coefficient of 0.007 and 0.005, respectively, and in the more severe group with partial regression coefficient of 0.019 = 0.007 + 0.012 (P = 0.007) and 0.010 = 0.005 + 0.005 (P = 0.078), respectively. The axial length and disc size were correlated with GCIPLT with marginal significance (P = 0.052 and P = 0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the macular GCC and GCIPL thickness and retinal sensitivity at the corresponding retinal areas differed between POAG with mild and advanced central VF damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27046122     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

Review 1.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Age-dependent changes in visual sensitivity induced by moving fixation points in adduction and abduction using imo perimetry.

Authors:  Takuhei Shoji; Izumi Mine; Tomoyuki Kumagai; Akane Kosaka; Yuji Yoshikawa; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Association of Superficial and Deep Macular Microvasculature with Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with High Myopia.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Joong Won Shin; Jin Yeong Lee; Min Su Baek; Michael S Kook
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Glaucoma Diagnostic Performance of Retinal Blood Flow Measurement With Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Tsubasa Abe; Takafumi Yoshioka; Youngseok Song; Tomofumi Tani; Motofumi Kawai; Tsuneaki Omae; Kengo Takahashi; Yoshitaka Takizawa; Tomoko Ro-Mase; Satoshi Ishiko; Kana Minamide; Jun Sakai; Masahiro Akiba; Yohei Hashimoto; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

5.  Retinal blood flow reduction in normal-tension glaucoma with single-hemifield damage by Doppler optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Takafumi Yoshioka; Youngseok Song; Motofumi Kawai; Tomofumi Tani; Kengo Takahashi; Satoshi Ishiko; Fabio Lavinsky; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Simplified automatic method for measuring the visual field using the perimeter ZERK 1.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski; Paweł Kasprowski; Marek Rzendkowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kumagai; Takuhei Shoji; Yuji Yoshikawa; Izumi Mine; Junji Kanno; Hirokazu Ishii; Akane Saito; Sho Ishikawa; Itaru Kimura; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.