Literature DB >> 27045743

Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites.

David R Lyon1,2, Ramón A Alvarez1, Daniel Zavala-Araiza1, Adam R Brandt3, Robert B Jackson4, Steven P Hamburg1.   

Abstract

Oil and gas (O&G) well pads with high hydrocarbon emission rates may disproportionally contribute to total methane and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the production sector. In turn, these emissions may be missing from most bottom-up emission inventories. We performed helicopter-based infrared camera surveys of more than 8000 O&G well pads in seven U.S. basins to assess the prevalence and distribution of high-emitting hydrocarbon sources (detection threshold ∼ 1-3 g s(-1)). The proportion of sites with such high-emitting sources was 4% nationally but ranged from 1% in the Powder River (Wyoming) to 14% in the Bakken (North Dakota). Emissions were observed three times more frequently at sites in the oil-producing Bakken and oil-producing regions of mixed basins (p < 0.0001, χ(2) test). However, statistical models using basin and well pad characteristics explained 14% or less of the variance in observed emission patterns, indicating that stochastic processes dominate the occurrence of high emissions at individual sites. Over 90% of almost 500 detected sources were from tank vents and hatches. Although tank emissions may be partially attributable to flash gas, observed frequencies in most basins exceed those expected if emissions were effectively captured and controlled, demonstrating that tank emission control systems commonly underperform. Tanks represent a key mitigation opportunity for reducing methane and VOC emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27045743     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption associated with Bakken tight oil.

Authors:  Ian J Laurenzi; Joule A Bergerson; Kavan Motazedi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor for Quantification of Venting Sources at Oil and Gas Sites.

Authors:  Simon A Festa-Bianchet; Scott P Seymour; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region.

Authors:  Christian Frankenberg; Andrew K Thorpe; David R Thompson; Glynn Hulley; Eric Adam Kort; Nick Vance; Jakob Borchardt; Thomas Krings; Konstantin Gerilowski; Colm Sweeney; Stephen Conley; Brian D Bue; Andrew D Aubrey; Simon Hook; Robert O Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Ramón A Alvarez; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Anthony J Marchese; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin.

Authors:  John C Lin; Ryan Bares; Benjamin Fasoli; Maria Garcia; Erik Crosman; Seth Lyman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Katherine A Roberts; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Reduction of Signal Drift in a Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy-Based Methane Flux Sensor.

Authors:  Scott P Seymour; Simon A Festa-Bianchet; David R Tyner; Matthew R Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Satellite-based survey of extreme methane emissions in the Permian basin.

Authors:  Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate; Luis Guanter; Yin-Nian Liu; Daniel J Varon; Joannes D Maasakkers; Yuzhong Zhang; Apisada Chulakadabba; Steven C Wofsy; Andrew K Thorpe; Riley M Duren; Christian Frankenberg; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Daniel H Cusworth; Yongguang Zhang; Karl Segl; Javier Gorroño; Elena Sánchez-García; Melissa P Sulprizio; Kaiqin Cao; Haijian Zhu; Jian Liang; Xun Li; Ilse Aben; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories.

Authors:  Bruno G Neininger; Bryce F J Kelly; Jorg M Hacker; Xinyi Lu; Stefan Schwietzke
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.