Literature DB >> 27045711

Prostate Biopsy Complications: A Dual Analysis.

Franklin Gaylis1, Ryan Nasseri2, Logan Fink2, Renee Calabrese2, Paul Dato2, Edward Cohen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure prostate needle biopsy (PNB)-associated complications and place of treatment: inpatient hospitalization and outpatient treatment. An electronic medical record (EMR) data query is compared to a patient questionnaire survey.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2410 patients underwent 2588 biopsies and were evaluated for PNB-associated complications. Two approaches were used: (1) EMR analysis based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology coding and chart review; and (2) patient-reported questionnaire and chart review validation. Serious complications were defined as any complication leading to a related hospitalization, visit to the emergency department (ED), urgent care (UC), or doctor's office within 30 days of the biopsy.
RESULTS: The EMR study revealed 69 (2.67%) serious complications leading to either hospitalization or treatment at an ED, UC, or doctor's office. Thirty serious complications led to hospitalization (1.16%), 14 patients (0.54%) were treated at the ED, 1 was managed at a UC (0.04%), and 24 (0.93%) were treated at the doctor's office. Of the 847 (35.1%) questionnaires considered appropriate for analysis, 36 (4.25%) reported treatment in either the hospital, ED, UC, or doctor's office. Nine patients (1.06%) reported being hospitalized within 30 days of the procedure, whereas 27 patients (3.19%) were treated in an outpatient setting, 8 (0.94%) at the ED, 3 (0.35%) at a UC, and 16 (1.89%) at the doctor's office.
CONCLUSION: Our dual analysis study indicates a slightly greater than 1% incidence of hospitalization due to serious complications following PNB. Serious complications appear to be more frequently managed outside the hospital setting (ED, UC, and doctor's office).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27045711     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

1.  A randomized controlled comparison between periprostatic nerve block and pelvic plexus block at the base and apex of 14-core prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Sung Jin Kim; Jongpill Lee; Dong Hyeon An; Chang-Hoo Park; Ju Hyun Lim; Han Gwun Kim; Jong Yeon Park
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Yumi Seo; Gilho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.