Literature DB >> 27044955

The Ethical Imperative And Moral Challenges Of Engaging Patients And The Public With Evidence.

Mildred Z Solomon1, Michael K Gusmano2, Karen J Maschke3.   

Abstract

Engaging patients and the public with evidence is an ethical imperative because engagement is central to respect for persons and will likely improve health outcomes, facilitate the stewardship of resources, enhance prospects for justice, and build public trust. However, patient and public engagement is also morally complex, because evidence alone is never definitive. As patients and the public engage with evidence, value conflicts will arise and must be managed to achieve trustworthy decision making. We outline value conflicts likely to emerge in the following five settings: clinical care, health care organizations, public health, the regulatory context, and among payers. Using a variety of examples, we offer suggestions about how such conflicts may be managed, including providing more opportunities for democratic deliberation and having more explicit community discussion of how to balance personal choice and community well-being, transparent discussions of cost and quality outcomes, and greater patient engagement in community-based participatory research and the governance of learning health systems. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of Health Care; Ethical Issues; Evidence-Based Medicine; Public Opinion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044955     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  19 in total

1.  A home for patient-oriented research.

Authors:  Kirsten Patrick; Maryam Kebbe; Diane Aubin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research.

Authors:  Diane Aubin; Marilynne Hebert; Dean Eurich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.

Authors:  Kerry A Ryan; Raymond G De Vries; Wendy R Uhlmann; J Scott Roberts; Michele C Gornick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Evidence-based bioethics: delineating the connections between science, practice, and values in medicine.

Authors:  Stjepan Orešković
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  An Educational Intervention to Train Professional Nurses in Promoting Patient Engagement: A Pilot Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Serena Barello; Guendalina Graffigna; Giuliana Pitacco; Maila Mislej; Maurizio Cortale; Livio Provenzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Early-career researchers' views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon; Geneviève Rouleau; Stanislav Birko
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  How Would Low-Income Communities Prioritize Medicaid Spending?

Authors:  C Daniel Myers; Edith C Kieffer; A Mark Fendrick; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Karen Calhoun; Lisa Szymecko; Lynnette LaHahnn; Charo Ledón; Marion Danis; Zachary Rowe; Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.977

Review 9.  Outside in - inside out. Creating focus on the patient - a vaccine company perspective.

Authors:  Denis Sohy; Isabelle Dusart; Philibert Goulet; Diane Visy; Luc Gasthuys; Tatjana Poplazarova; Thomas Breuer; Norman Begg
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  What should community organisations consider when deciding to partner with researchers? A critical reflection on the Zilla Budakattu Girijana Abhivrudhhi Sangha experience in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Bridget Pratt; Tanya Seshadri; Prashanth N Srinivas
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.