Joanne F Kelvin1, Bridgette Thom2, Catherine Benedict2, Jeanne Carter2, Stacie Corcoran2, Maura N Dickler2, Karyn A Goodman2, Allison Margolies2, Matthew J Matasar2, Ariela Noy2, Shari B Goldfarb2. 1. Joanne F. Kelvin, Bridgette Thom, Jeanne Carter, Stacie Corcoran, Maura N. Dickler, Matthew J. Matasar, Ariela Noy, and Shari B. Goldfarb, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Catherine Benedict, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY; Karyn A. Goodman, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; and Allison Margolies, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA kelvinj@mskcc.org. 2. Joanne F. Kelvin, Bridgette Thom, Jeanne Carter, Stacie Corcoran, Maura N. Dickler, Matthew J. Matasar, Ariela Noy, and Shari B. Goldfarb, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Catherine Benedict, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY; Karyn A. Goodman, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; and Allison Margolies, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A cancer and fertility program was established at a large cancer center to support clinicians in discussing treatment-related fertility risks and fertility preservation (FP) options with patients and in referring patients to reproductive specialists. The program provides resources, clinician education, and fertility clinical nurse specialist consultation. This study evaluated the program's impact on patient satisfaction with information received. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional surveys assessed satisfaction before (cohort 1 [C1]) and after (cohort 2 [C2]) program initiation. Questionnaires were investigator-designed, gender-specific, and anonymous. RESULTS: Most C1 (150 males, 271 females) and C2 (120 males, 320 females) respondents were 2 years postdiagnosis; the most frequently reported cancers were testicular, breast, and lymphoma. A significant difference in satisfaction with the amount of information received was seen between C1 and C2. For males, satisfaction with information on fertility risks was high in both cohorts but significantly greater in C2 for information on sperm banking (χ(2) = 9.3, P = .01) and finding a sperm bank (χ(2) = 13.3, P = .001). For females, satisfaction with information was significantly greater in C2 for information on fertility risks (χ(2) = 62.1, P < .001), FP options (χ(2) = 71.9, P < .001), help with decision making (χ(2) = 80.2, P < .001), and finding a reproductive endocrinologist (χ(2) = 60.5, P < .001). Among patients who received and read information materials, 96% of males and 99% of females found them helpful. Among C2 females, fertility clinical nurse specialist consultation was associated with significantly greater satisfaction with information on FP options (χ(2) = 11.2, P = .004), help with decision making (χ(2) = 10.4, P = .006), and finding a reproductive endocrinologist (χ(2) = 22.6, P < .001), with 10% reporting lack of knowledge as a reason for not pursuing FP. CONCLUSION: Improvements in patient satisfaction with information received demonstrate the potential for fertility programs in cancer care settings to improve the quality of clinician-patient discussions about fertility.
PURPOSE: A cancer and fertility program was established at a large cancer center to support clinicians in discussing treatment-related fertility risks and fertility preservation (FP) options with patients and in referring patients to reproductive specialists. The program provides resources, clinician education, and fertility clinical nurse specialist consultation. This study evaluated the program's impact on patient satisfaction with information received. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional surveys assessed satisfaction before (cohort 1 [C1]) and after (cohort 2 [C2]) program initiation. Questionnaires were investigator-designed, gender-specific, and anonymous. RESULTS: Most C1 (150 males, 271 females) and C2 (120 males, 320 females) respondents were 2 years postdiagnosis; the most frequently reported cancers were testicular, breast, and lymphoma. A significant difference in satisfaction with the amount of information received was seen between C1 and C2. For males, satisfaction with information on fertility risks was high in both cohorts but significantly greater in C2 for information on sperm banking (χ(2) = 9.3, P = .01) and finding a sperm bank (χ(2) = 13.3, P = .001). For females, satisfaction with information was significantly greater in C2 for information on fertility risks (χ(2) = 62.1, P < .001), FP options (χ(2) = 71.9, P < .001), help with decision making (χ(2) = 80.2, P < .001), and finding a reproductive endocrinologist (χ(2) = 60.5, P < .001). Among patients who received and read information materials, 96% of males and 99% of females found them helpful. Among C2 females, fertility clinical nurse specialist consultation was associated with significantly greater satisfaction with information on FP options (χ(2) = 11.2, P = .004), help with decision making (χ(2) = 10.4, P = .006), and finding a reproductive endocrinologist (χ(2) = 22.6, P < .001), with 10% reporting lack of knowledge as a reason for not pursuing FP. CONCLUSION: Improvements in patient satisfaction with information received demonstrate the potential for fertility programs in cancer care settings to improve the quality of clinician-patient discussions about fertility.
Authors: Peter F Coccia; Alberto S Pappo; Jessica Altman; Smita Bhatia; Scott C Borinstein; Joseph Flynn; A Lindsay Frazier; Suzanne George; Robert Goldsby; Robert Hayashi; Mary S Huang; Rebecca H Johnson; Lynda Kwon Beaupin; Michael P Link; Kevin C Oeffinger; Kathleen M Orr; Damon Reed; Holly L Spraker; Deborah A Thomas; Margaret von Mehren; Daniel S Wechsler; Kimberly F Whelan; Brad Zebrack; Dorothy A Shead; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Clement K Gwede; Joyce D Reinecke; Tina M Mason; Celso Silva Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Joyce D Reinecke; Joanne F Kelvin; Sarah R Arvey; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Jennifer Levine; Lindsay N Beck; Andy Miller Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeremy Lewin; Justin Ming Zheng Ma; Laura Mitchell; Seline Tam; Natasha Puri; Derek Stephens; Amirrtha Srikanthan; Philippe Bedard; Albiruni Razak; Michael Crump; David Warr; Meredith Giuliani; Abha Gupta Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jessica Keim-Malpass; Hannah S Fitzhugh; Laura P Smith; Ryan P Smith; Jeanne Erickson; Mike G Douvas; Tanya Thomas; Gina Petroni; Linda Duska Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Charles R Rogers; Michael J Rovito; Musse Hussein; Ogechi Jessica Obidike; Rebekah Pratt; Mark Alexander; Jerica M Berge; Marc Dall'Era; Jeffrey W Nix; Christopher Warlick Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Nicholas D Yeager; Sarah H O'Brien; Stacy Whiteside; Anthony Audino; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Molly B Moravek; Leslie C Appiah; Antoinette Anazodo; Karen C Burns; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Holly R Hoefgen; Olivia Jaworek Frias; Monica M Laronda; Jennifer Levine; Lillian R Meacham; Mary Ellen Pavone; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Erin E Rowell; Andrew C Strine; Teresa K Woodruff; Leena Nahata Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Natasha N Frederick; James L Klosky; Lillian R Meacham; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Joanne Frankel Kelvin; Brooke Cherven; David R Freyer; Christopher C Dvorak; Julienne Brackett; Sameeya Ahmed-Winston; Elyse Bryson; Eric J Chow; Jennifer Levine Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Janella N Hudson; Nathanael B Stanley; Leena Nahata; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care Date: 2017-03-28
Authors: Supriya Behl; Vidhu B Joshi; Reda S Hussein; David L Walker; Kari L Lampat; Anthony G Krenik; Kathrynne M Barud; Jolene R Fredrickson; Terri M Galanits; Katherine J Rian; Adriana M Delgado; Julia H Byrne; Dean Potter; Siobhan T Pittock; Carola A S Arndt; Yulian Zhao; Patricio C Gargollo; Candace F Granberg; Zaraq Khan; Asma J Chattha Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 3.412