| Literature DB >> 27044730 |
Nilay N Suthar1, Khushali L Patel, Chirag Saparia, Ami P Parikh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is twice as high as in Western countries. Prognostic factors for predicting function outcome and mortality play a major role in determining the treatment outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27044730 PMCID: PMC5402816 DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.176259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Afr Med ISSN: 0975-5764
Figure 1Site of hematoma
Clinical outcomes, intraventricular hemorrhage and midline shift in relation to the location of intracranial hemorrhage
| Location | Mortality | Morbidity | IVH | Midline shift | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | Percentage | Percentage | Percentage | |||||
| All patients ( | 41 | 41 | 15 | 15 | 27 | 27 | 34 | 34 |
| Basal ganglia ( | 17 | 35 | 8 | 16 | 12 | 24 | 14 | 29 |
| Thalamus ( | 8 | 57 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 43 | 5 | 36 |
| Lobar ( | 6 | 29 | 3 | 21 | 8 | 38 | 11 | 52 |
| Brainstem ( | 6 | 67 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 44 |
| Cerebellar ( | 4 | 57 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
IVH=Intraventricular hemorrhage
Outcome in relation to the size of the hematoma in general
| Size in cm3 | Cases ( | Midline shift | Ventricular extension | Outcome (mRS) at 6 weeks | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRS 1 | mRS 2 | mRS 3 | mRS 4 | mRS 5 | mRS 6 | Total | ||||
| <5 | 39 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 39 |
| 5.1-15 | 22 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 22 |
| 15.1-30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 14 |
| >30 | 25 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 25 |
| Total | 100 | 34 | 27 | 24 | 20 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 41 | 100 |
The P value for mRS <3 versus mRS >3 is <0.0001. There is a significant linear trend among the ordered categories. mRS=Modified Rankin's scale
Size of intracerebral hemorrhage and its mean value in relation to mortality
| Clinical outcome at 6 weeks | Number of patients | Mean value (cm3) | SDM | SEM | 95% CI of mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 100 | 19.55 | 21.56 | 2.16 | 15.23–23.87 | <0.0001 |
| Patients who died | 41 | 37.63 | 22.95 | 3.58 | 30.47–44.79 | |
| Patients who survived | 59 | 6.98 | 6.19 | 0.80 | 5.38–8.58 |
CI=Confidence interval, SEM=Standard error of mean, SDM=Standard deviation of mean
Size of intracerebral hemorrhage and its mean value in relation to clinical outcome (at 6 weeks) Modified Rankin's scale ≤3 and Modified Rankin's scale >3
| Clinical outcome at 6 weeks | Number of patient | Mean value (cm3) | SDM | SEM | 95% CI of mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 100 | 19.55 | 21.56 | 2.16 | 15.23-23.87 | <0.0001 |
| Patients with mRS <3 | 56 | 6.71 | 6.05 | 0.80 | 5.09-8.33 | |
| Patients with mRS >3 | 44 | 35.81 | 23.02 | 3.47 | 28.80-42.81 |
CI=Confidence interval, SEM=Standard error of mean, SDM=Standard deviation of mean, mRS=Modified Rankin's scale
Figure 2Clinical outcome in relation to intracerebral hemorrhage score
Clinical outcome in relation to Glasgow Coma Scale score, intracerebral hemorrhage score, intraventricular hemorrhage, midline shift
| Number of patients | mRS <3 | mRS >3 | mRS 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICH score | ||||||
| 0 | 41 | 39 | 2 | 1 | 68.08 | <0.0001 |
| 1 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 2 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 15 | ||
| 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 18 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total | 100 | 56 | 44 | 41 | ||
| GCS score | ||||||
| <8 | 36 | 1 | 35 | 34 | 61.33 | <0.0001 |
| >8 | 64 | 55 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Total | 100 | 56 | 44 | 41 | ||
| IVH | ||||||
| Present | 27 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 5.398 | <0.05 |
| Absent | 73 | 46 | 27 | 25 | ||
| Total | 100 | 56 | 44 | 41 | ||
| Midline shift | ||||||
| Present | 34 | 7 | 27 | 25 | 26.217 | <0.0001 |
| Absent | 66 | 49 | 17 | 16 | ||
| Total | 100 | 56 | 44 | 41 |
GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale, ICH=Intracerebral hemorrhage, IVH=Intraventricular hemorrhage, mRS=Modified Rankin's scale
Multiple regression analysis of different variable with mortality
| Variable | Beta coefficient | SE | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 4.538 | 1.799 | 0.966-8.111 |
| A: Age | 0.014 | 0.012 | −0.011-0.038 |
| B: Mean BP | 0.003 | 0.012 | −0.020-0.026 |
| C: GCS score | −0.269 | 0.049 | −0.366-−0.172 |
| D: ICH score | 0.272 | 0.170 | −0.066-0.610 |
| F: Size | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.003-0.028 |
GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale, ICH=Intracerebral hemorrhage, CI=Confidence interval, SE=Standard error, BP=Blood pressure
Which variable(s) make a significant contribution to outcome?
| Variable | Beta coefficient | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 2.522 | 0.013 | Yes |
| A: Age | 1.115 | 0.268 | No |
| B: Mean BP | 0.258 | 0.797 | No |
| C: GCS score | −5.492 | <0.0001 | Yes |
| D: ICH score | 1.597 | 0.114 | No |
| F: Size | 2.381 | 0.019 | Yes |
GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale, ICH=Intracerebral hemorrhage, BP=Blood pressure
| Component | ICH score points |
|---|---|
| GCS score at presentation | |
| 13-15 | 0 |
| 5-12 | 1 |
| 3-4 | 2 |
| ICH volume (cm3) | |
| ≥30 | 1 |
| <30 | 0 |
| IVH | |
| Yes | 1 |
| No | 0 |
| Origin of ICH | |
| Infratentorial | 1 |
| Supratentorial | 0 |
| Age | |
| ≥80 | 1 |
| <80 | 0 |
| Total ICH score | 0-6 |
ICH=Intracerebral hemorrhage, IVH=Intraventricular hemorrhage, GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale