| Literature DB >> 27043638 |
María Gabriela Gallego1, Michael H Gordon2, Francisco Segovia3, María Pilar Almajano Pablos4.
Abstract
The development of antioxidant-active packaging has numerous advantages, such as the reduction of synthetic additives in food, the reduction of plastic waste and food protection against oxidation reactions. Different concentrations of extracts of the plants Caesalpinia decapetala (CD) and Caesalpinia spinosa "Tara" (CS) were incorporated into gelatine films as natural antioxidants. The physical, mechanical and antioxidant properties of these films were studied. Films containing plant extracts at a high concentration had lower tensile strength with higher elongation at break points, compared to the control film (p < 0.05). Films exhibited antioxidant activity in the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and Trolox equivalence antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assays when added at 0.2%. The application of gelatine film containing CD and CS was found to be effective in delaying lipid oxidation and deterioration of beef patty quality during storage. Therefore, the films prepared in this study offered an alternative edible coating for the preservation of fresh food.Entities:
Keywords: Caesalpinia decapetala; Tara; antioxidant activity; beef patties; gelatine film; lipid oxidation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27043638 PMCID: PMC4931531 DOI: 10.3390/antiox5020010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1(a) Polyphenol concentration of films with different concentrations of plants extracts: Caesalpinia spinosa 1 (CS1) (0.07%), CS2 (0.1%), CS1 (0.2%), Caesalpinia decapetala 1 (CD1) (0.3%), CD2 (0.7%), CD1 (1%); (b) Antioxidant activity by oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and Trolox equivalence antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assays of films with different concentrations of plant extracts; (c) Correlation for polyphenol content from the Folin assay with antioxidant activity assessed by the TEAC and ORAC assays.
Figure 2Infrared spectra of gelatine-based films treated with different samples: CTR (control), BHA, CS3 and CD3.
The effects of CD and Tara at different concentrations on the tensile strength (TS) and elongation at break (EAB) of gelatine films.
| Sample | TS (Mpa) | EAB (%) |
|---|---|---|
| CTR | 69.8 ± 9.5 a,c | 95.6 ± 13.5 a |
| CD 1 | 96.4 ± 6.2 b | 108.0 ± 15.9 a |
| CD 2 | 68.5 ± 18.2 a | 231.1 ± 82.6 b |
| CD 3 | 57.0 ± 5.8 c | 404.4 ± 51.8 c |
| CS 1 | 123.8 ± 1.5 d | 178.9 ± 53.3 b |
| CS 2 | 86.6 ± 10.1 a | 58.6 ± 5.8 d |
| CS 3 | 55.7 ± 10.6 c | 357.4 ± 40.1 c |
| BHA | 109.5 ± 12.5 e | 62.9 ± 15.2 d |
Different lowercase letters (a–e) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples.
Water vapour permeability (WVP) of the different gelatine films.
| Sample | WVP |
|---|---|
| Control | 1.94 a ± 0.1 |
| CD 3 | 1.11 b ± 0.2 |
| CS 3 | 1.32 c ± 0.2 |
| BHA | 1.12 b ± 0.1 |
Different lowercase letters (a–c) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples.
Light transmission (%T) and opacity of gelatine films with CD and CS extracts at different concentrations of the different gelatine films.
| Samples | % | Opacity |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 87.00 | 4.46 a ± 0.02 |
| CD 1 | 86.30 | 4.92 d ± 0.02 |
| CD 2 | 85.51 | 5.23 c ± 0.03 |
| CD 3 | 64.86 | 14.46 b ± 0.01 |
| CS 1 | 88.10 | 4.23 g ± 0.02 |
| CS 2 | 87.30 | 4.54 f ± 0.03 |
| CS 3 | 85.90 | 5.08 e ± 0.02 |
| BHA | 79.98 | 7.46 h ± 0.01 |
Different lowercase letters (a–h) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy of gelatine films with different concentrations of plant extracts (1500×).
Colour parameters of gelatine films: control, CD3 (1%), CS3 (0.2%) and BHA.
| Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 74.12 a ± 1.21 | 0.86 a ± 0.30 | 4.51 a ± 1.47 | |
| 72.35 b ± 1.04 | −1.39 b ± 0.63 | 8.37 b ± 1.45 | |
| 75.16 a ± 0.81 | 2.33 c ± 1.33 | 8.15 b ± 1.52 | |
| 73.93 a ± 1.53 | −1.69 d ± 0.41 | 7.77 b ± 0.80 |
Mean values are showed for color parameters (lightness, L *; redness, a *; yellowness, b *). Different lowercase letters (a–d) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples.
Figure 4(a) Effects of films with CD and CS added at 1% and 0.2%, respectively, on the TBARS value (mg of malondialdehyde equivalent/kg of sample) of raw beef patties during 12 days of refrigerated storage at 4 °C and (b) effects of CD and CS extract added on metmyoglobin changes in beef patties during 12 days of refrigerated storage at 4 °C. Results are given as the mean ± standard error.