Literature DB >> 27043192

Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Nerve Sheath Tumors in the Cervical Spine.

Bo Li1, Huabin Yin1, Tong Meng1, Pingting Zhou2, Zhitao Han1, Qi Jia1, Weiluo Cai1, Shuai Han1, Ting Wang1, Tianrui Chen1, Wang Zhou1, Jianru Xiao1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to illustrate the long-term follow-up results and discuss the possible factors that may affect outcomes of patients with cervical spinal nerve sheath tumors (CSNSTs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nerve sheath tumors are the most common neoplasms in the spine, but minimal information was published in the literature, especially when regarding to prognostic factors due to the benign nature. The objective of our study was to present long-term follow-up results and discuss the possible factors that may affect outcomes of patients with CSNSTs.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with CSNSTs was performed by survival analysis. The local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method to identify potential prognostic factors. Factors with P values ≤0.1 were subjected to multivariate analysis by Cox regression analysis. P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: A total of 169 patients with CSNSTs were included in the study. All patients received surgical treatment. The mean follow-up period was 72.1 months (median 62.0, range 1-158). Local recurrence was detected in 14 patients after surgery in our center, whereas death occurred in 9 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (median 24, range 1-84). The statistical analyses suggested that resection mode and pathology type were independent prognostic factors for LRFS and OS. In addition, postoperative recurrence was an adverse independent factor to OS.
CONCLUSION: Total resection could significantly improve the LRFS and OS for patients with CSNSTs, whereas malignant CSNST was associated with worse prognosis. Moreover, postoperative recurrence was an adverse independent factor to OS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27043192     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

Review 1.  Intraosseous schwannoma of the mobile spine: a report of twenty cases.

Authors:  Yong Qiang Wang; Jin Xin Hu; Shao Min Yang; Liang Jiang; Xiao Guang Liu; Hui Shu Yuan; Feng Wei; Zhong Jun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Malignant Spinal Dumbbell Tumors.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Kenichi Kawaguchi; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Makoto Endo; Nokitaka Setsu; Keiichiro Iida; Satoshi Baba; Hirokazu Saiwai; Akinobu Matsushita; Mitsumasa Hayashida; Seiji Okada; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-04-27

3.  Purely extradural thoracal Schwanoma: Case report.

Authors:  Rohadi Muhammad Rosyidi; Dewa Putu Wisnu Wardhana; Bambang Priyanto; Kevin Gunawan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.