Literature DB >> 27042995

Challenges facing contemporary preimplantation genetic screening.

Caroline Juneau1, Jason Franasiak, Nathan Treff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aneuploidy is a leading cause of pregnancy failure. Although initial attempts to perform preimplantation genetic screening did not improve outcomes, validated techniques were developed to safely and effectively increase pregnancy rates. Still, many embryos designated as euploid do not implant. Current approaches are being refined to provide additional biologic insight into why this is the case. At present, the diagnosis and clinical relevance of segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism are amongst the more heavily investigated. RECENT
FINDINGS: Class I data have proven the safety of trophectoderm biopsy and validation studies have shown single nucleotide polymorphism array and quantitative PCR can accurately detect whole chromosome aneuploidy. Similar studies to validate next generation sequencing are underway. Although randomized control trials have demonstrated the clinical utility of preimplantation genetic screening, recent data on the impact of mosaicism and segmental aneuploidy require clarification.
SUMMARY: Several well powered randomized control trials have shown preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation rate. Plausible explanations for euploid failures include undetected mosaicism and segmental aneuploidy. However, the true incidence and dispersion of mosaicism within the embryo is unknown. Likewise, the resolution of detection and clinical significance of segmental aneuploidy is unclear. Further research to validate proposed detection algorithms and class I data to determine if detection impacts outcomes is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042995     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  4 in total

1.  A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism.

Authors:  David Goodrich; Xin Tao; Chelsea Bohrer; Agnieszka Lonczak; Tongji Xing; Rebekah Zimmerman; Yiping Zhan; Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Non-invasive methods for embryo selection.

Authors:  H N Sallam; N H Sallam; S H Sallam
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-06-27

3.  Preimplantation Genetic Screening with Spent Culture Medium/Blastocoel Fluid for in Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Penghao Li; Zhe Song; Yaxin Yao; Tianhua Huang; Rurong Mao; Jun Huang; Yongyi Ma; Xin Dong; Wenlong Huang; Jihua Huang; Tianjian Chen; Ting Qu; Lingxiao Li; Ying Zhong; Jiang Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenic Disease Relative Risk Reduction: Evaluation of Genomic Index Performance in 11,883 Adult Sibling Pairs.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Jennifer Eccles; Diego Marin; Edward Messick; Louis Lello; Jessalyn Gerber; Jia Xu; Laurent C A M Tellier
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.