Literature DB >> 27042817

Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.

Susann Beier1, John A Ormiston2, Mark W Webster3, John E Cater4, Stuart E Norris4, Pau Medrano-Gracia4, Alistair A Young4, Brett R Cowan4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and dynamically scaled phantom phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) for coronary flow assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Left main coronary bifurcations segmented from computed tomography with bifurcation angles of 33°, 68°, and 117° were scaled-up ∼7× and 3D printed. Steady coronary flow was reproduced in these phantoms using the principle of dynamic similarity to preserve the true-scale Reynolds number, using blood analog fluid and a pump circuit in a 3T MRI scanner. After PC-MRI acquisition, the data were segmented and coregistered to CFD simulations of identical, but true-scale geometries. Velocities at the inlet region were extracted from the PC-MRI to define the CFD inlet boundary condition.
RESULTS: The PC-MRI and CFD flow data agreed well, and comparison showed: 1) small velocity magnitude discrepancies (2-8%); 2) with a Spearman's rank correlation ≥0.72; and 3) a velocity vector correlation (including direction) of r(2) ≥ 0.82. The highest agreement was achieved for high velocity regions with discrepancies being located in slow or recirculating zones with low MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNRv ) in tortuous segments and large bifurcating vessels.
CONCLUSION: Characterization of coronary flow using a dynamically scaled PC-MRI phantom flow is feasible and provides higher resolution than current in vivo or true-scale in vitro methods, and may be used to provide boundary conditions for true-scale CFD simulations. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;44:983-992.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Keywords:  CFD; coronaries; dynamic similarity; hemodynamics; phase-contrast MRI; scaled phantom flow

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042817     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  4 in total

Review 1.  Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dimitris Mitsouras; Shi-Joon Yoo; Peter P Liu; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  3D Printing for Cardiovascular Applications: From End-to-End Processes to Emerging Developments.

Authors:  Ramtin Gharleghi; Claire A Dessalles; Ronil Lal; Sinead McCraith; Kiran Sarathy; Nigel Jepson; James Otton; Abdul I Barakat; Susann Beier
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Accuracy of vascular tortuosity measures using computational modelling.

Authors:  Vishesh Kashyap; Ramtin Gharleghi; Darson D Li; Lucy McGrath-Cadell; Robert M Graham; Chris Ellis; Mark Webster; Susann Beier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  M Kelm; L Goubergrits; J Bruening; P Yevtushenko; J F Fernandes; S H Sündermann; F Berger; V Falk; T Kuehne; S Nordmeyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.