| Literature DB >> 27042627 |
Jorge Alfredo Léo1, Alessanda da Cunha2, Elias Félix de Oliveira3, Reuder Pereira Prado4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of low-level laser therapy (GaAs, 904 nm) for bone repair on tibial fractures in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Fracture Healing; Fractures, Bone; Lasers
Year: 2015 PMID: 27042627 PMCID: PMC4799407 DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30092-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Figure 1Tibia stabilized with needle used as an intramedullary nail. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 2Application of gallium arsenide laser (GaAs) to the right paw of the animal. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 3Fractured tibia undergoing three-point mechanical flexion test. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 4Lateral-view radiographs on experimental group II (EG II): (A) just after fracturing; (B) on 15th day; (C) on 30th day; and (D) on 45th day. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 5Lateral-view radiographs on experimental group III (EG III): (A) just after fracturing; (B) on 15th day; (C) on 30th day; and (D) on 45th day. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 6Lateral-view radiographs on experimental group IV (EG IV): (A) just after fracturing; (B) on 15th day; (C) on 30th day; and (D) on 45th day. Source: University of Uberaba.
Figure 7Comparison of mean maximum force (N) between the groups. The symbol ♦ represents statistically significant differences shown by the experimental groups II, III and IV (EG II, EG III and EG IV) versus the control group (CG); the symbol • represents statistically significant differences shown by experimental group II (EG II) and experimental group III (EG III) versus experimental group IV (EG IV).