Literature DB >> 27042586

Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Recharge Ability of Conventional and Hydroxyapatite Modified Glass Ionomer Cement with Daily Low Fluoride Exposure- An Invitro Study.

Antarmayee Panigrahi1, S Sudeep2, Shalini Sharma3, Susant Mohanty4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) has best suited paediatric dentists and is well recognised in the preventive era of dentistry. However its use is affected by its inferior mechanical properties. Hydroxyapatite whiskers have been lately introduced as strengthening additive without affecting its fluoride releasing property, but literature lacks data related to its effect on recharging ability of glass ionomer cement. AIM: To evaluate and compare fluoride release from hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement following recharging with low fluoride dentifrices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 8% Hydroxyapatite whiskers were added to Conventional Glass ionomer powder and 40 specimens each of conventional and Hydroxyapatite Glass ionomer cement were prepared using customised Teflon mould (5mm x 2mm) and were suspended in deionised water. Recharging of aged specimens was done using low fluoridated dentifrices containing 500ppm fluoride, twice daily and water was replenished every 24 hours. Fluoride release was analysed daily for 7 days and then weekly till 21 days using Sension 4 pH/ion selective electrode. Data thus obtained was statistically analysed by descriptive analysis followed by repeated measures ANOVA.
RESULTS: Significant (p<0.01) increase in fluoride release was observed in both the materials following recharging regimen. Recharge pattern of hydroxyapatite glass ionomer was found to be similar to conventional glass ionomer cement.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study it can be evinced that fluoride rechargability and re-release remains unaffected by the addition of hydroxyapatite whiskers and hence proves to be more acceptable additive to glass ionomer cement to improve its mechanical properties widening its arena of usage by clinicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low fluoridated dentifrices; Mechanical properties; Recharging; Whiskers

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042586      PMCID: PMC4800652          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17685.7236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  12 in total

1.  Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials.

Authors:  Xiaoming Xu; John O Burgess
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Fluoride release of restorative materials exposed to a fluoridated dentifrice.

Authors:  K J Donly; J J Nelson
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

3.  Effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release by glass ionomer-based restoratives.

Authors:  Rick Freedman; Kim E Diefenderfer
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ruchika Bansal; Tajinder Bansal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

5.  Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach.

Authors:  Poul Erik Petersen; Michael A Lennon
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.383

6.  Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement.

Authors:  Milanita E Lucas; Kenji Arita; Mizuho Nishino
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from PRG-composites and compomer on application of topical fluoride: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Kanika Singh Dhull; B Nandlal
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar

8.  Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Hatibović-Kofman; G Koch
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1991

9.  Recharge pattern of contemporary glass ionomer restoratives.

Authors:  Farahnaz Arbabzadeh-Zavareh; Tim Gibbs; Ian A Meyers; Majid Bouzari; Shiva Mortazavi; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-03

10.  Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials.

Authors:  Dejan Lj Markovic; Bojan B Petrovic; Tamara O Peric
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  1 in total

1.  Brushing Effect on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified by Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles or by Bioactive Glasses.

Authors:  Rafael A Martins; Luana M Marti; Ana C B Mendes; Camila Fragelli; Mario Cilense; Angela C C Zuanon
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.