| Literature DB >> 27042359 |
Amanda L Smith1, Ted S Rosenkrantz2, R Holly Fitch1.
Abstract
Hypoxia ischemia (HI) is a recognized risk factor among late-preterm infants, with HI events leading to varied neuropathology and cognitive/behavioral deficits. Studies suggest a sex difference in the incidence of HI and in the severity of subsequent behavioral deficits (with better outcomes in females). Mechanisms of a female advantage remain unknown but could involve sex-specific patterns of compensation to injury. Neuroprotective hypothermia is also used to ameliorate HI damage and attenuate behavioral deficits. Though currently prescribed only for HI in term infants, cooling has potential intrainsult applications to high-risk late-preterm infants as well. To address this important clinical issue, we conducted a study using male and female rats with a postnatal (P) day 7 HI injury induced under normothermic and hypothermic conditions. The current study reports patterns of neuropathology evident in postmortem tissue. Results showed a potent benefit of intrainsult hypothermia that was comparable for both sexes. Findings also show surprisingly different patterns of compensation in the contralateral hemisphere, with increases in hippocampal thickness in HI females contrasting reduced thickness in HI males. Findings provide a framework for future research to compare and contrast mechanisms of neuroprotection and postinjury plasticity in both sexes following a late-preterm HI insult.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27042359 PMCID: PMC4794561 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2585230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Behavioral findings from Smith et al. [33].
| Task | Benefit of hypothermia |
|---|---|
| Rotarod | Beneficial to females |
| Silent gap (auditory processing) | Beneficial to males |
| Morris water maze | Beneficial to females |
| Nonspatial maze | Beneficial to males and females |
Mean and standard error (SE) for volumetric measures of 6 brain areas in the right and left hemisphere reflecting reductions in the right hemisphere.
| Left hemisphere | Right hemisphere | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex | Hippocampus | Internal capsule | Corpus callosum | Ventricle | Cortex | Hippocampus | Internal capsule | Corpus callosum | Ventricle | |
| Male HI normothermic ( | 144.80 ± 5.52 | 15.82 ± 1.90 | 7.22 ± 0.50 | 8.93 ± 0.68 | 3.40 ± 0.59 | 37.35 ± 12.57 | 3.01 ± 2.15 | 2.20 ± 0.61 | 3.02 ± 1.10 | 10.25 ± 1.18 |
| Male HI hypothermic ( | 155.02 ± 5.23 | 16.08 ± 1.80 | 7.36 ± 0.47 | 11.22 ± 0.64 | 3.40 ± 0.56 | 114.32 ± 11.92 | 11.57 ± 2.04 | 4.77 ± 0.58 | 9.10 ± 1.05 | 5.96 ± 1.12 |
| Male sham ( | 150.82 ± 4.78 | 20.16 ± 1.64 | 7.31 ± 0.43 | 12.40 ± 0.59 | 3.96 ± 0.51 | 149.41 ± 10.88 | 21.15 ± 1.86 | 7.62 ± 0.53 | 12.83 ± 0.95 | 2.87 ± 1.02 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Female HI normothermic ( | 147.41 ± 5.52 | 18.94 ± 1.90 | 7.77 ± 0.50 | 9.50 ± 0.68 | 3.46 ± 0.59 | 54.61 ± 12.57 | 4.44 ± 2.15 | 2.96 ± 0.61 | 4.26 ± 1.01 | 8.79 ± 1.18 |
| Female HI hypothermic ( | 144.61 ± 5.23 | 15.14 ± 1.80 | 6.57 ± 0.47 | 11.76 ± 0.64 | 2.37 ± 0.56 | 126.76 ± 11.92 | 9.98 ± 2.04 | 5.54 ± 0.58 | 10.02 ± 1.05 | 4.58 ± 1.11 |
| Female sham ( | 146.69 ± 4.78 | 21.03 ± 1.64 | 7.08 ± 0.43 | 11.78 ± 0.59 | 2.30 ± 0.51 | 143.01 ± 10.88 | 20.08 ± 1.86 | 7.16 ± 0.53 | 11.70 ± 0.95 | 1.90 ± 1.02 |
Significant reductions as compared to sham counterparts.
Significant differences between HI hypothermic and HI normothermic animals.
Significant differences between all 3 Treatment groups within each Sex.
Figure 1(a) A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Injury) × 2 (Temperature) ANOVA revealed a significant Injury (p < 0.05) and Temperature (p < 0.05) effect, as well as an Injury × Temperature interaction (p < 0.05) and a trend for a Sex × Injury interaction (p = 0.19). An independent samples t-test between HI normothermic and HI hypothermic animals revealed a significant effect (p < 0.05) and a similar effect was seen when t-tests were performed for males (p < 0.05) and females (p < 0.05) separately. (b) A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Injury) × 2 (Temperature) ANOVA revealed a significant Injury (p < 0.05) and Temperature (p < 0.05) effect, as well as an Injury × Temperature interaction (p < 0.05). An independent samples t-test between HI normothermic and HI hypothermic animals revealed a significant effect (p < 0.05) and a similar effect was seen when t-tests were performed for males (p < 0.05) and females (p < 0.05) separately. (c) A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Injury) × 2 (Temperature) ANOVA revealed a significant Injury (p < 0.05) and Temperature (p < 0.05) effect, as well as an Injury × Temperature interaction (p < 0.05). An independent samples t-test between HI normothermic and HI hypothermic animals revealed a significant effect (p < 0.05) and this pattern was also seen in females (p < 0.05) but not in males (p > 0.05). (d) A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Injury) × 2 (Temperature) ANOVA revealed a significant Injury (p < 0.05) and Temperature (p < 0.05) effect, as well as an Injury × Temperature interaction (p < 0.05). An independent samples t-test between HI normothermic and HI hypothermic animals revealed a significant effect (p < 0.05) and this pattern was also seen in females (p < 0.05) but not in males (p > 0.05).
Figure 2A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Injury) × 2 (Temperature) ANOVA revealed a significant Injury effect (p < 0.05). Independent samples t-tests did not yield significant effects.
Mean and standard error (SE) for subregions of the left hippocampus.
| Left hippocampal area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA1 | CA3 (within dentate gyrus) | CA3 (outside of dentate gyrus) | Dentate gyrus | |
| Male HI normothermic ( | 77.278 ± 3.616 | 165.526 ± 9.037 | 104.759 ± 6.536 | 102.571 ± 3.912 |
| Male HI hypothermic ( | 75.602 ± 3.616 | 165.319 ± 9.037 | 118.022 ± 6.536 | 96.898 ± 3.912 |
| Male sham ( | 89.782 ± 3.271 | 179.179 ± 8.174 | 114.924 ± 5.912 | 108.002 ± 3.538 |
| Female HI normothermic ( | 76.800 ± 3.616 | 172.759 ± 9.037 | 114.541 ± 6.536 | 92.238 ± 3.912 |
| Female HI hypothermic ( | 76.443 ± 3.835 | 169.996 ± 9.585 | 100.108 ± 6.932 | 88.432 ± 4.149 |
| Female sham ( | 77.245 ± 3.132 | 164.928 ± 7.826 | 99.681 ± 5.660 | 88.581 ± 3.388 |
Figure 3A 2 (Sex) × 2 (Treatment) ANOVA revealed a trend for a significant Sex effect (p = 0.06) and a significant Sex × Treatment interaction (p < 0.05). Individual independent samples t-tests for each sex separately revealed a trend for HI male normothermic animals to have significantly thinner hippocampal cellular layer thickness (# p = 0.077), but HI female normothermic animals were revealed to have thicker hippocampal cell layers.