Literature DB >> 27041395

Physicians prefer greater detail in the biosimilar label (SmPC) - Results of a survey across seven European countries.

Anna Hallersten1, Walter Fürst2, Riccardo Mezzasalma3.   

Abstract

In the European Union, labels (Summaries of Product Characteristics, SmPCs) of biosimilars and their reference products are in many instances almost identical (following a generic approach) despite different data requirements for the authorization of biosimilars and generics. To understand physicians' preferences on type and detail of information in the biosimilar label and their use of information sources when prescribing biologics including biosimilars, EuropaBio surveyed 210 physicians across seven European countries. Among surveyed physicians, 90.5% use the label frequently or occasionally as an information source and 87.2% deemed a clear statement on the origin of data helpful or very helpful. When comparing excerpts from the label of an authorized biosimilar and modified texts with additional information, 78.1-82.9% preferred the samples with additional information. This survey shows that the label is an appropriate vehicle for providing physicians with information about biologics and that physicians prefer more product-specific information in the biosimilar label.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biosimilars; Labelling survey; Physician preference; Regulatory requirements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27041395     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  8 in total

Review 1.  Monoclonal Antibody and Fusion Protein Biosimilars Across Therapeutic Areas: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.

Authors:  Ira Jacobs; Danielle Petersel; Lesley G Shane; Chee-Keng Ng; Carol Kirchhoff; Gregory Finch; Sadiq Lula
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.807

2.  Supply-side and demand-side policies for biosimilars: an overview in 10 European member states.

Authors:  Cécile Rémuzat; Anna Kapuśniak; Aleksandra Caban; Dan Ionescu; Guerric Radière; Cyril Mendoza; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-04-28

Review 3.  Can biosimilars help achieve the goals of US health care reform?

Authors:  Ralph Boccia; Ira Jacobs; Robert Popovian; Gilberto de Lima Lopes
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Type and Extent of Information on (Potentially Critical) Quality Attributes Described in European Public Assessment Reports for Adalimumab Biosimilars.

Authors:  Ali M Alsamil; Thijs J Giezen; Toine C Egberts; Hubert G Leufkens; Helga Gardarsdottir
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 5.  The Quality and Reliability of Information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics.

Authors:  Ewelina Drelich; Urszula Religioni; Kevin Chung; Justyna Kaźmierczak; Eliza Blicharska; Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska; Jerzy Krysiński; Piotr Merks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Awareness and Knowledge of Pharmacists toward Biosimilar Medicines: A Survey in Jordan.

Authors:  Muna Oqal; Bushra Hijazi; Abdelrahim Alqudah; Ahmad Al-Smadi; Basima A Almomani; Roaa Alnajjar; Majd Abu Ghunaim; Mohammad Irshaid; Aroob Husam
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.149

7.  Physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kati Sarnola; Merja Merikoski; Johanna Jyrkkä; Katri Hämeen-Anttila
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  An inventory of medicinal products causing skin rash: Clinical and regulatory lessons.

Authors:  Robert Ancuceanu; Mihaela Dinu; Florentina Furtunescu; Daniel Boda
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.