Literature DB >> 27040463

Functional nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging.

Xinpei Mao1,2, Jiadi Xu3,4, Honggang Cui5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Nanoparticle-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have received much attention over the past decade. By virtue of a high payload of magnetic moieties, enhanced accumulation at disease sites, and a large surface area for additional modification with targeting ligands, nanoparticle-based contrast agents offer promising new platforms to further enhance the high resolution and sensitivity of MRI for various biomedical applications. T 2 * superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) first demonstrated superior improvement on MRI sensitivity. The prevailing SPION attracted growing interest in the development of refined nanoscale versions of MRI contrast agents. Afterwards, T 1 -based contrast agents were developed, and became the most studied subject in MRI due to the positive contrast they provide that avoids the susceptibility associated with MRI signal reduction. Recently, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents have emerged and rapidly gained popularity. The unique aspect of CEST contrast agents is that their contrast can be selectively turned 'on' and 'off' by radiofrequency saturation. Their performance can be further enhanced by incorporating a large number of exchangeable protons into well-defined nanostructures. Besides activatable CEST contrast agents, there is growing interest in developing nanoparticle-based activatable MRI contrast agents responsive to stimuli (pH, enzyme, etc.), which improves sensitivity and specificity. In this review, we summarize the recent development of various types of nanoparticle-based MRI contrast agents, and have focused our discussions on the key advantages of introducing nanoparticles in MRI. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2016, 8:814-841. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1400 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27040463      PMCID: PMC5050056          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  101 in total

1.  Self-assembled peptide amphiphile nanofibers conjugated to MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Steve R Bull; Mustafa O Guler; Rafael E Bras; Thomas J Meade; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Tracking neural stem cells in patients with brain trauma.

Authors:  Jianhong Zhu; Liangfu Zhou; FengGe XingWu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Yb(III)-HPDO3A: a dual pH- and temperature-responsive CEST agent.

Authors:  Daniela Delli Castelli; Enzo Terreno; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Simultaneous in vivo pH and temperature mapping using a PARACEST-MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  Nevin McVicar; Alex X Li; Mojmír Suchý; Robert H E Hudson; Ravi S Menon; Robert Bartha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Gadolinium-loaded liposomes allow for real-time magnetic resonance imaging of convection-enhanced delivery in the primate brain.

Authors:  Ryuta Saito; Michal T Krauze; John R Bringas; Charles Noble; Tracy R McKnight; Pamela Jackson; Michael F Wendland; Christoph Mamot; Daryl C Drummond; Dimitri B Kirpotin; Keelung Hong; Mitchel S Berger; John W Park; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Biodegradable polydisulfide dendrimer nanoclusters as MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Ching-Hui Huang; Kido Nwe; Ajlan Al Zaki; Martin W Brechbiel; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Collective activation of MRI agents via encapsulation and disease-triggered release.

Authors:  Mathieu L Viger; Jagadis Sankaranarayanan; Caroline de Gracia Lux; Minnie Chan; Adah Almutairi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 8.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance cancer imaging.

Authors:  Zhuxian Zhou; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2012-10-09

9.  Structural optimization of Zn(II)-activated magnetic resonance imaging probes.

Authors:  Lauren M Matosziuk; Jonathan H Leibowitz; Marie C Heffern; Keith W MacRenaris; Mark A Ratner; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.165

10.  T1 relaxivity of core-encapsulated gadolinium liposomal contrast agents--effect of liposome size and internal gadolinium concentration.

Authors:  Ketan Ghaghada; Catherine Hawley; Keigo Kawaji; Ananth Annapragada; Srinivasan Mukundan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  11 in total

1.  One-Component Supramolecular Filament Hydrogels as Theranostic Label-Free Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents.

Authors:  Lye Lin Lock; Yuguo Li; Xinpei Mao; Hanwei Chen; Verena Staedtke; Renyuan Bai; Wang Ma; Ran Lin; Yi Li; Guanshu Liu; Honggang Cui
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Advances of magnetic nanoparticles in environmental application: environmental remediation and (bio)sensors as case studies.

Authors:  Bo Jiang; Luning Lian; Yi Xing; Nana Zhang; Yating Chen; Pei Lu; Dayi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Superparamagnetic reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanocarriers for magnetically guided drug delivery.

Authors:  Sarika Sabnis; Nirupama A Sabnis; Sangram Raut; Andras G Lacko
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 4.  Optical fluorescence imaging with shortwave infrared light emitter nanomaterials for in vivo cell tracking in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Leyla Fath-Bayati; Mohammad Vasei; Ehsan Sharif-Paghaleh
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  Novel nanomedicine with a chemical-exchange saturation transfer effect for breast cancer treatment in vivo.

Authors:  Yanlong Jia; Chaochao Wang; Jiehua Zheng; Guisen Lin; Dalong Ni; Zhiwei Shen; Baoxuan Huang; Yan Li; Jitian Guan; Weida Hong; Yuanfeng Chen; Renhua Wu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 6.  Advances in Monitoring Cell-Based Therapies with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ethel J Ngen; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Leishmanicidal Activity of Biogenic Fe₃O₄ Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mehrdad Khatami; Hajar Alijani; Iraj Sharifi; Fatemeh Sharifi; Shahram Pourseyedi; Sam Kharazi; Marcos Augusto Lima Nobre; Manouchehr Khatami
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2017-11-20

8.  Potential use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo bioimaging of human myoblasts.

Authors:  Kamil R Wierzbinski; Tomasz Szymanski; Natalia Rozwadowska; Jakub D Rybka; Agnieszka Zimna; Tomasz Zalewski; Karolina Nowicka-Bauer; Agnieszka Malcher; Magdalena Nowaczyk; Michal Krupinski; Michal Fiedorowicz; Piotr Bogorodzki; Pawel Grieb; Michal Giersig; Maciej K Kurpisz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Surface impact on nanoparticle-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Weizhong Zhang; Lin Liu; Hongmin Chen; Kai Hu; Ian Delahunty; Shi Gao; Jin Xie
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Influence of Magnetic Micelles on Assembly and Deposition of Porphyrin J-Aggregates.

Authors:  Maria Angela Castriciano; Mariachiara Trapani; Andrea Romeo; Nicoletta Depalo; Federica Rizzi; Elisabetta Fanizza; Salvatore Patanè; Luigi Monsù Scolaro
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.