Literature DB >> 27040244

Scaffolds for bone regeneration made of hydroxyapatite microspheres in a collagen matrix.

Rahmatullah Cholas1, Sanosh Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan2, Francesca Gervaso3, Gayatri Udayan3, Graziana Monaco3, Alessandro Sannino3, Antonio Licciulli3.   

Abstract

Biomimetic scaffolds with a structural and chemical composition similar to native bone tissue may be promising for bone tissue regeneration. In the present work hydroxyapatite mesoporous microspheres (mHA) were incorporated into collagen scaffolds containing an ordered interconnected macroporosity. The mHA were obtained by spray drying of a nano hydroxyapatite slurry prepared by the precipitation technique. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed that the microspheres were composed only of hydroxyapatite (HA) phase, and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis revealed the Ca/P ratio to be 1.69 which is near the value for pure HA. The obtained microspheres had an average diameter of 6 μm, a specific surface area of 40 m(2)/g as measured by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis, and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) analysis showed a mesoporous structure with an average pore diameter of 16 nm. Collagen/HA-microsphere (Col/mHA) composite scaffolds were prepared by freeze-drying followed by dehydrothermal crosslinking. SEM observations of Col/mHA scaffolds revealed HA microspheres embedded within a porous collagen matrix with a pore size ranging from a few microns up to 200 μm, which was also confirmed by histological staining of sections of paraffin embedded scaffolds. The compressive modulus of the composite scaffold at low and high strain values was 1.7 and 2.8 times, respectively, that of pure collagen scaffolds. Cell proliferation measured by the MTT assay showed more than a 3-fold increase in cell number within the scaffolds after 15 days of culture for both pure collagen scaffolds and Col/mHA composite scaffolds. Attractive properties of this composite scaffold include the potential to load the microspheres for drug delivery and the controllability of the pore structure at various length scales.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatible; Collagen; Compressive strength; Hydroxyapatite microsphere; Scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27040244     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  11 in total

1.  Tissue-engineered 3D cancer-in-bone modeling: silk and PUR protocols.

Authors:  Ushashi Dadwal; Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Sarah Linehan; Clifford J Rosen; David L Kaplan; Julie Sterling; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 2.  Bacteriophage-based biomaterials for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Binrui Cao; Yan Li; Tao Yang; Qing Bao; Mingying Yang; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Small non-coding RNAs-based bone regulation and targeting therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Sijie Fang
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  PLGA-BMP-2 and PLA-17β-Estradiol Microspheres Reinforcing a Composite Hydrogel for Bone Regeneration in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Patricia García-García; Ricardo Reyes; Elisabet Segredo-Morales; Edgar Pérez-Herrero; Araceli Delgado; Carmen Évora
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  PLLA Porous Microsphere-Reinforced Silk-Based Scaffolds for Auricular Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Yan Zeng; Xiaokai Li; Xia Liu; Yuzhou Yang; Zhimin Zhou; Jincai Fan; Haiyue Jiang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  In vivo Histological Examination of the Graft Site 3 Years after Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Nanohydroxyapatite Augmentation.

Authors:  Giorgio Princi; Marco Rossini; Fabio Marzilli; Riccardo Di Niccolo; Fabio Conteduca; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-10

Review 7.  3D Bioprinted Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State-Of-The-Art and Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Zahra Yazdanpanah; James D Johnston; David M L Cooper; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 8.  Biologically Inspired Collagen/Apatite Composite Biomaterials for Potential Use in Bone Tissue Regeneration-A Review.

Authors:  Barbara Kołodziejska; Agnieszka Kaflak; Joanna Kolmas
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Mesoporous Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Loaded With Recombinant-Human Amelogenin Could Enhance Antibacterial Effect and Promote Periodontal Regeneration.

Authors:  Yue Liao; Huxiao Li; Rong Shu; Huiwen Chen; Liping Zhao; Zhongchen Song; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  A Comparative Study of Two Bone Graft Substitutes-InterOss® Collagen and OCS-B Collagen®.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Dylan Blaauw; Steve Chang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.