Literature DB >> 27039780

Assessing the EORTC QLQ-BM22 Module Using Rasch Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis across Countries: a Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Patients with Bone Metastases.

Chung-Ying Lin1, Amir H Pakpour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Bone Metastases Module (EORTC QLQ-BM22) is a recently designed supplement to EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Additional psychometric properties, especially using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Rasch model, are warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 573 patients with bone metastases were enrolled from eight countries with a mean±SD age of 55.8±13.7 years. Slightly more than two thirds of them were female (n=383; 66.8%). CFA was used to examine the BM22 framework; Rasch models were applied to understand misfit items and differential item functioning (DIF).
RESULTS: The fit indices were satisfactory in CFA (comparative fit index=0.972, Tucker-Lewis index=0.964, root mean square error of approximation=0.076, and standardized root mean square residual=0.045). All items fit well in the Rasch models (mean square values were between 0.5 and 1.5), and only one item (number 17) displayed DIF across gender. However, there were six DIF items across Canada and Taiwan, ten across Canada and Iran, and six across Taiwan and Iran.
CONCLUSIONS: The BM22 has satisfactory psychometric properties, and could assess the QoL of patients with bone metastases specifically focusing on their symptoms. Clinicians may want to use it to capture the underlying QoL for patients with bone metastases. However, the score of item 17 should be interpreted with caution when comparing male and female patients. In addition, researchers should note that variation in DIF items may occur when conducting an international study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27039780     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.1405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  5 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation of a short-form version of the Swedish "Attitudes to and Knowledge of Oral Health" questionnaire.

Authors:  Maria Snogren; Amir H Pakpour; Irene Eriksson; Malin Stensson; Kristina Ek; Maria Browall
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.070

2.  Using the Affiliate Stigma Scale with caregivers of people with dementia: psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Chang; Jian-An Su; Chung-Ying Lin
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.982

3.  Validation of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire for Brazilian adult burn patients.

Authors:  Noélle de Oliveira Freitas; Carlos García Forero; Marina Paes Caltran; Jordi Alonso; Rosana A Spadoti Dantas; Monica Sarto Piccolo; Jayme Adriano Farina; John W Lawrence; Lidia A Rossi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Persian translation of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Vida Imani; Chung-Ying Lin; Shabnam Jalilolgadr; Amir H Pakpour
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2018-07-07

5.  BOMET-QoL-10 questionnaire for breast cancer patients with bone metastasis: the prospective MABOMET GEICAM study.

Authors:  A Barnadas; M Muñoz; M Margelí; J I Chacón; J Cassinello; S Antolin; E Adrover; M Ramos; E Carrasco; M A Jimeno; B Ojeda; X González; S González; M Constenla; J Florián; A Miguel; A Llombart; A Lluch; M Ruiz-Borrego; R Colomer; S Del Barco
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.