Literature DB >> 27039511

Sperm whales reduce foraging effort during exposure to 1-2 kHz sonar and killer whale sounds.

Saana Isojunno, Charlotte Cure, Petter Helgevold Kvadsheim, Frans-Peter Alexander Lam, Peter Lloyd Tyack, Paul Jacobus Wensveen, Patrick James O'Malley Miller.   

Abstract

The time and energetic costs of behavioral responses to incidental and experimental sonar exposures, as well as control stimuli, were quantified using hidden state analysis of time series of acoustic and movement data recorded by tags (DTAG) attached to 12 sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) using suction cups. Behavioral state transition modeling showed that tagged whales switched to a non-foraging, non-resting state during both experimental transmissions of low-frequency active sonar from an approaching vessel (LFAS; 1-2 kHz, source level 214 dB re 1 µPa m, four tag records) and playbacks of potential predator (killer whale, Orcinus orca) sounds broadcast at naturally occurring sound levels as a positive control from a drifting boat (five tag records). Time spent in foraging states and the probability of prey capture attempts were reduced during these two types of exposures with little change in overall locomotion activity, suggesting an effect on energy intake with no immediate compensation. Whales switched to the active non-foraging state over received sound pressure levels of 131-165 dB re 1 µPa during LFAS exposure. In contrast, no changes in foraging behavior were detected in response to experimental negative controls (no-sonar ship approach or noise control playback) or to experimental medium-frequency active sonar exposures (MFAS; 6-7 kHz, source level 199 re 1 µPa m, received sound pressure level [SPL] = 73-158 dB re 1 µPa). Similarly, there was no reduction in foraging effort for three whales exposed to incidental, unidentified 4.7-5.1 kHz sonar signals received at lower levels (SPL = 89-133 dB re 1 µPa). These results demonstrate that similar to predation risk, exposure to sonar can affect functional behaviors, and indicate that increased perception of risk with higher source level or lower frequency may modulate how sperm whales respond to anthropogenic sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27039511     DOI: 10.1890/15-0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  7 in total

1.  Selective reactions to different killer whale call categories in two delphinid species.

Authors:  Matthew T Bowers; Ari S Friedlaender; Vincent M Janik; Douglas P Nowacek; Nicola J Quick; Brandon L Southall; Andrew J Read
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Evidence for ship noise impacts on humpback whale foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Hannah B Blair; Nathan D Merchant; Ari S Friedlaender; David N Wiley; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  When the noise goes on: received sound energy predicts sperm whale responses to both intermittent and continuous navy sonar.

Authors:  Saana Isojunno; Paul J Wensveen; Frans-Peter A Lam; Petter H Kvadsheim; Alexander M von Benda-Beckmann; Lucía M Martín López; Lars Kleivane; Eilidh M Siegal; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Changes in the acoustic activity of beaked whales and sperm whales recorded during a naval training exercise off eastern Canada.

Authors:  Joy E Stanistreet; Wilfried A M Beslin; Katie Kowarski; S Bruce Martin; Annabel Westell; Hilary B Moors-Murphy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Fine-scale movement responses of free-ranging harbour porpoises to capture, tagging and short-term noise pulses from a single airgun.

Authors:  Floris M van Beest; Jonas Teilmann; Line Hermannsen; Anders Galatius; Lonnie Mikkelsen; Signe Sveegaard; Jeppe Dalgaard Balle; Rune Dietz; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Breathing Patterns Indicate Cost of Exercise During Diving and Response to Experimental Sound Exposures in Long-Finned Pilot Whales.

Authors:  Saana Isojunno; Kagari Aoki; Charlotte Curé; Petter Helgevold Kvadsheim; Patrick James O'Malley Miller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Interacting effects of vessel noise and shallow river depth elevate metabolic stress in Ganges river dolphins.

Authors:  Mayukh Dey; Jagdish Krishnaswamy; Tadamichi Morisaka; Nachiket Kelkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.