| Literature DB >> 27039315 |
Eric D Wicks1, Melanie A Morscher2, Meadow Newton2, Richard P Steiner3, Dennis S Weiner4,5,6,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Triple arthrodesis is a commonly performed salvage procedure to correct hindfoot deformity. Non-union is considered an undesirable radiographic outcome; however, the clinical ramifications of this are not as well defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of partial or complete radiographic non-union after triple arthrodesis in children and characterize the clinical consequences.Entities:
Keywords: Calcaneocuboid joint; Hindfoot deformity; Hindfoot fusion; Pseudoarthrosis; Radiographic non-union; Subtalar joint; Talonavicular joint; Triple arthrodesis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27039315 PMCID: PMC4837165 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0730-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Fig. 1Representative medical illustrations of sections of bone removed during the procedure to provide conforming surfaces to be held in apposition for fusion of each joint from (a) medial and (b) anteroposterior views
Fig. 2Representative images of the operative procedure including medical illustrations and radiographs of the completed triple arthrodesis with pin fixation of the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints from (a) medial and (b) anteroposterior views. In this case, another pin was placed in the first metatarsal because a metatarsal osteotomy was performed in conjunction with the triple arthrodesis
Fig. 3Radiographic examples of a complete union (a, b) and non-union (c, d) after a triple arthrodesis. The complete union radiographs were taken 1 year and 7 months after surgery in a male who had a triple arthrodesis surgery for a tarsal coalition at 13 years of age (a, b). The non-union radiographs were taken 2 years and 6 months after surgery in a male who had triple arthrodesis for a tarsal coalition and syndromic condition at 13 years of age (c, d)
Characteristics of the triple arthrodesis partial or non-union cases identified in this study
| Ptb | Gdr | Diagnosis category | Side | Complications | Pain description | Active | Prev surgb | Subs surgb | Subs surg | SubTal X-ray union |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | M | CMT | R | None | a | Y | 0 | 0 | Y | |
| 4.1 | M | CMT, tarsal coalition | R | Superficial skin necrosis | Chronic | a | 0 | 0 | Y | |
| 42 | F | Clubfoot | R | None | Only with prolonged activity | Y | 2 | 0 | Y | |
| 66.1 | M | CMT | R | None | a | Y | 0 | 0 | Y | |
| 82 | M | Tarsal coalition, syndrome | L | None | Occasional | a | 0 | 0 | Y | |
| 8.1 | M | CP | R | None | a | a | 0 | 1 | Y | |
| 8.2 | M | CP | L | None | a | a | 0 | 1 | Y | |
| 12 | M | Tarsal coalition | L | Wound infection | Occasional | Y | 0 | 1 | Triple revision | Y |
| 14 | M | CP | L | None | a | a | 0 | 1 | Akron dome | Y |
| 21.1 | M | Clubfoot | R | None | None | Y | 1 | 0 | Y | |
| 26.1 | F | CP, hypotonic | R | None | a | a | 0 | 0 | Y | |
| 74 | F | Clubfoot | R | None | None | a | 4 | 0 | 70 % | |
| 79.1 | M | Diplegia, TBI | R | None | a | Y | 1 | 1 | Soft tissue | Y |
| 86.1 | M | Tarsal coalition | L | None | None | Y | 0 | 0 | 30 % |
Cal-Cub calcaneocuboid, CMT Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, CP cerebral palsy, F female, FUP follow-up, FWB full weight-bearing, Gdr gender, L left, M male, Prev previous, Pt patient, R right, Subs Surg subsequent surgery, SubTal subtalar, Tal-Nav talonavicular, TBI traumatic brain injury, Y yes
aNot mentioned in chart
bNumber
Joints involved in the 14 cases that did not achieve complete radiographic union
| Joint | Number of cases |
|---|---|
| Talonavicular | 8 cases (5 partial non-unions; 3 non-unions) |
| Calcaneocuboid | 3 cases (2 partial non-unions; 1 non-union) |
| Subtalar | 2 cases (both partial non-unions) |
| Talonavicular and calcaneocuboid | 1 case (both non-unions) |
Summary of clinical and subjective outcomes for the complete union and partial or non-union groups. Since this was a retrospective review, only outcomes mentioned in the chart are included in the percent calculation
| Outcomes | Non-union group ( | Complete union group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | |||
| No pain or occasional pain | 86 %a | 85 %a | 0.959 |
| Constant pain | 14 %a | 15 %a | |
| Return to previous activity | 100 %a | 100 %a | n/a |
| Subsequent triple revision surgery | 1 case | 8 cases | 0.802 |
| Complications | |||
| Wound infection | 7 % | 7 % | 0.997 |
| Other | 7 % | 6 % | |
n/a not applicable, n sample size
aSample sizes for analyses were seven for the non-union group and 80 and 76 for the complete union group, for the pain and activity outcomes, respectively
Underlying diagnoses in the complete union and partial or non-union groups
| Diagnosis | Partial and non-union group ( | Complete union group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Clubfoot | 21 | 29 | 0.023 |
| Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease | 21 | 4 | |
| Neurologic disordera | 37 | 41 | |
| Tarsal coalition | 21 | 10 | |
| Other | 0 | 16 |
aIncluded cerebral palsy, diplegia, myelomeningocele, and traumatic brain injury