Literature DB >> 27038946

Fate of virginiamycin through the fuel ethanol production process.

Kenneth M Bischoff1, Yanhong Zhang2, Joseph O Rich3.   

Abstract

Antibiotics are frequently used to prevent and treat bacterial contamination of commercial fuel ethanol fermentations, but there is concern that antibiotic residues may persist in the distillers grains coproducts. A study to evaluate the fate of virginiamycin during the ethanol production process was conducted in the pilot plant facilities at the National Corn to Ethanol Research Center, Edwardsville, IL. Three 15,000-liter fermentor runs were performed: one with no antibiotic (F1), one dosed with 2 parts per million (ppm) of a commercial virginiamycin product (F2), and one dosed at 20 ppm of virginiamycin product (F3). Fermentor samples, distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), and process intermediates (whole stillage, thin stillage, syrup, and wet cake) were collected from each run and analyzed for virginiamycin M and virginiamycin S using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Virginiamycin M was detected in all process intermediates of the F3 run. On a dry-weight basis, virginiamycin M concentrations decreased approximately 97 %, from 41 μg/g in the fermentor to 1.4 μg/g in the DDGS. Using a disc plate bioassay, antibiotic activity was detected in DDGS from both the F2 and F3 runs, with values of 0.69 μg virginiamycin equivalent/g sample and 8.9 μg/g, respectively. No antibiotic activity (<0.6 μg/g) was detected in any of the F1 samples or in the fermentor and process intermediate samples from the F2 run. These results demonstrate that low concentrations of biologically active antibiotic may persist in distillers grains coproducts produced from fermentations treated with virginiamycin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotics; Distillers grains; Fuel ethanol; Virginiamycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038946     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-016-2026-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Mechanisms of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin among isolates of Enterococcus faecium from animals, raw meat, and hospital patients in Western Europe.

Authors:  M Soltani; D Beighton; J Philpott-Howard; N Woodford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Presence and biological activity of antibiotics used in fuel ethanol and corn co-product production.

Authors:  D M Paulus Compart; A M Carlson; G I Crawford; R C Fink; F Diez-Gonzalez; A Dicostanzo; G C Shurson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation.

Authors:  S H Hynes; D M Kjarsgaard; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; S H Hynes; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Patrick Butaye; Luc A Devriese; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle.

Authors:  T S Edrington; K M Bischoff; G H Loneragan; D J Nisbet
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Using drug-loaded pH-responsive poly(4-vinylpyridine) microspheres as a new strategy for intelligent controlling of Lactobacillus plantarum contamination in bioethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Ming Li; Hong-Wei Hu; Ze Chen; Ya-Xian Zhang; Hao Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Microbial-derived products as potential new antimicrobials.

Authors:  Bruce S Seal; Djamel Drider; Brian B Oakley; Harald Brüssow; David Bikard; Joseph O Rich; Stefan Miller; Estelle Devillard; Jason Kwan; Gérard Bertin; Stuart Reeves; Steven M Swift; Margot Raicek; Cyril G Gay
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Recombinant bacteriophage LysKB317 endolysin mitigates Lactobacillus infection of corn mash fermentations.

Authors:  Shao-Yeh Lu; Kenneth M Bischoff; Joseph O Rich; Siqing Liu; Christopher D Skory
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Quantification and Degradation of 2,2-Dibromo-3-Nitrilopropionamide (DBNPA) in Bioethanol Fermentation Coproducts.

Authors:  J V Simpson; C L Wiatr
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.253

6.  Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro.

Authors:  Beilei Ge; Kelly J Domesle; Qianru Yang; Shenia R Young; Crystal L Rice-Trujillo; Sonya M Bodeis Jones; Stuart A Gaines; Marla W Keller; Xin Li; Silvia A Piñeiro; Brooke M Whitney; Heather C Harbottle; Jeffrey M Gilbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.