Literature DB >> 27038769

Durable Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Patients with Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Final Results of a 3.5-Year Study.

Victor W Nitti1, David Ginsberg2, Karl-Dietrich Sievert3, David Sussman4, Sidney Radomski5, Peter Sand6, Dirk De Ridder7, Brenda Jenkins8, Andrew Magyar9, Christopher Chapple10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: These are the final results of the prospective, multicenter, long-term (3.5-year) study of the efficacy/safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who completed either of 2, 24-week phase 3 trials could enter a 3-year extension and continue treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U as needed to control overactive bladder symptoms. Data were analyzed by the treatment(s) received (up to 6) and in discrete subgroups that received 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 treatments (to evaluate the consistency of the response after repeat treatments in the same patient groups). Assessments included the change from baseline in the number of urinary incontinence episodes per day and the proportion of patients who reported improvement/great improvement in urinary symptoms on the TBS (Treatment Benefit Scale) at week 12 as co-primary end points. Other end points were the change from baseline in I-QOL (Incontinence Quality of Life), the number of urgency and micturition episodes per day; duration of effect; the number of adverse events; and the initiation of intermittent catheterization.
RESULTS: Consistent mean reductions in urinary incontinence were observed following continued onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, ranging from -3.1 to -3.8 in the overall population and -2.9 to -4.5 in the discrete subgroups. Durable improvements were seen in overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life. A high proportion of patients rated their condition as improved/greatly improved. The median duration of effect was 7.6 months. The most common adverse event was urinary tract infection. The rate of de novo catheterization after the first treatment was 4.0% and it ranged from 0.6% to 1.7% after subsequent treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term onabotulinumtoxinA treatment consistently decreased overactive bladder symptoms and improved quality of life with no new safety signals.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  onabotulinumtoxinA; quality of life; urinary bladder, overactive; urinary incontinence; urinary tract infections

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038769     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

1.  Adverse Events Associated with Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Medium- to long-term outcomes of botulinum toxin A for idiopathic overactive bladder.

Authors:  David Eldred-Evans; Arun Sahai
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-10-19

3.  CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jacques Corcos; Mikolaj Przydacz; Lysanne Campeau; Gary Gray; Duane Hickling; Christiane Honeine; Sidney B Radomski; Lynn Stothers; Adrian Wagg; Frcp Lond
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Complications of Botox and their Management.

Authors:  Rose Leu; Gillian L Stearns
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Treatment for refractory overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sacral neuromodulation and onabotulinumtoxinA.

Authors:  Qing He; Boya Li; Chi Zhang; Jie Zhang; Deyi Luo; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Past, Present and Future of Chemodenervation with Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

Authors:  Pradeep Tyagi; Mahendra Kashyap; Naoki Yoshimura; Michael Chancellor; Christopher J Chermansky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation for Urgency Incontinence-Reply.

Authors:  Cindy L Amundsen; Holly E Richter; Dennis Wallace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cindy L Amundsen; Yuko M Komesu; Christopher Chermansky; W Thomas Gregory; Deborah L Myers; Emily F Honeycutt; Sandip P Vasavada; John N Nguyen; Tracey S Wilson; Heidi S Harvie; Dennis Wallace
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparison of 100 U With 200 U of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumToxinA for Nonneurogenic Urgency Incontinence.

Authors:  Whitney K Hendrickson; Cindy L Amundsen; David D Rahn; Isuzu Meyer; Megan S Bradley; Ariana L Smith; Deborah L Myers; J Eric Jelovsek; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.913

10.  Early and Consistent Improvements in Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase IV Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kurt McCammon; Angelo Gousse; Alfred Kohan; David Glazier; Jennifer Gruenenfelder; Zhanying Bai; Anand Patel; Douglass Hale
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.