Joseph Yeboah1, Carlos J Rodriguez2, Waqas Qureshi3, Songtao Liu4, J Jeffrey Carr5, Joao A Lima6, W Gregory Hundley3, David M Herrington3. 1. Heart and Vascular Center of Excellence, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: jyeboah@wakehealth.edu. 2. Heart and Vascular Center of Excellence, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 3. Heart and Vascular Center of Excellence, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 4. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Cardiology and Radiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 6. Cardiology and Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular systolic function predicts worse outcomes. However, the optimal threshold for "normal" left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is uncertain. In general, LVEF ≥ 55% is considered to be "normal" by guidelines, with a low normal designation for LVEF being 50%-55%. We assessed the prognosis of participants with low normal LVEF in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. All participants were asymptomatic and had no known clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 4926 out of 6814 had LVEF assessed with the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), had no significant valvular disease, did not have myocardial infarction during follow-up, had complete data, and were included in this analysis. A total of 83/4926 (1.7%) had LVEF < 50% (low LVEF) and 101/4926 (2.1%) had low normal LVEF. Cox proportional hazard and cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the association between LVEF category and 10 years of adjudicated incident congestive heart failure (CHF) and all-cause mortality adjusting for (model 1) age, sex, and race and (model 2) model 1 and diabetes mellitus, smoking, systolic blood pressure (BP), BP medications, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, low-density lipoprotein, family history of coronary heart disease, educational status, and LV mass. Mean age was 61 ± 10 years, 47% were men, 35% were on BP medications, 9% had diabetes. After 10.2 years of follow-up, 109 (2.2%) had CHF and 427 (8.7%) died. Compared with normal LVEF (≥55%), low normal LVEF and low LVEF were associated with an increased risk for incident CHF during follow-up in our multivariable Cox models: hazard ratios (HRs) 3.64 (95% CI 1.76-7.52) and 9.52 (5.63-17.52), respectively. Unlike low LVEF, low normal LVEF was not associated with increased risk of death compared with normal LVEF in our fully adjusted models: HRs 3.03 (1.94-4.73) and 1.32 (0.72-2.41), respectively. In the adjusted spline analysis HR of LVEF 55% as reference, LVEF had a U-shape association of future CHF risk and LVEF. CONCLUSION: Low normal LVEF is as prevalent as low LVEF in asymptomatic community-dwelling adults. We observed a gradient-response association between the 3 categories of LVEF (low, low normal, and normal) and incident CHF but not for all-cause death.
BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular systolic function predicts worse outcomes. However, the optimal threshold for "normal" left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is uncertain. In general, LVEF ≥ 55% is considered to be "normal" by guidelines, with a low normal designation for LVEF being 50%-55%. We assessed the prognosis of participants with low normal LVEF in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. All participants were asymptomatic and had no known clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 4926 out of 6814 had LVEF assessed with the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), had no significant valvular disease, did not have myocardial infarction during follow-up, had complete data, and were included in this analysis. A total of 83/4926 (1.7%) had LVEF < 50% (low LVEF) and 101/4926 (2.1%) had low normal LVEF. Cox proportional hazard and cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the association between LVEF category and 10 years of adjudicated incident congestive heart failure (CHF) and all-cause mortality adjusting for (model 1) age, sex, and race and (model 2) model 1 and diabetes mellitus, smoking, systolic blood pressure (BP), BP medications, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, low-density lipoprotein, family history of coronary heart disease, educational status, and LV mass. Mean age was 61 ± 10 years, 47% were men, 35% were on BP medications, 9% had diabetes. After 10.2 years of follow-up, 109 (2.2%) had CHF and 427 (8.7%) died. Compared with normal LVEF (≥55%), low normal LVEF and low LVEF were associated with an increased risk for incident CHF during follow-up in our multivariable Cox models: hazard ratios (HRs) 3.64 (95% CI 1.76-7.52) and 9.52 (5.63-17.52), respectively. Unlike low LVEF, low normal LVEF was not associated with increased risk of death compared with normal LVEF in our fully adjusted models: HRs 3.03 (1.94-4.73) and 1.32 (0.72-2.41), respectively. In the adjusted spline analysis HR of LVEF 55% as reference, LVEF had a U-shape association of future CHF risk and LVEF. CONCLUSION: Low normal LVEF is as prevalent as low LVEF in asymptomatic community-dwelling adults. We observed a gradient-response association between the 3 categories of LVEF (low, low normal, and normal) and incident CHF but not for all-cause death.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S A Hunt; D W Baker; M H Chin; M P Cinquegrani; A M Feldman; G S Francis; T G Ganiats; S Goldstein; G Gregoratos; M L Jessup; R J Noble; M Packer; M A Silver; L W Stevenson; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; A K Jacobs; L F Hiratzka; R O Russell; S C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Shunsuke Natori; Shenghan Lai; J Paul Finn; Antoinette S Gomes; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Gregory Pearson; Shantanu Sinha; Andrew Arai; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald; L A Moyé; L Basta; E J Brown; T E Cuddy; B R Davis; E M Geltman; S Goldman; G C Flaker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph Yeboah; Carlos J Rodriguez; Brandon Stacey; Joao A Lima; Songtao Liu; J Jeffrey Carr; W Gregory Hundley; David M Herrington Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Manar D Samad; Gregory J Wehner; Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Linyuan Jing; Andrew J Powell; Tal Geva; Christopher M Haggerty; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Gregory J Wehner; Linyuan Jing; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Joseph B Leader; Dustin N Hartzel; H Lester Kirchner; Joseph N A Manus; Nick James; Zina Ayar; Patrick Gladding; Christopher W Good; John G F Cleland; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-03-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Enrique Santas; Patricia Palau; Pau Llácer; Rafael de la Espriella; Gema Miñana; Gonzalo Núñez-Marín; Miguel Lorenzo; Raquel Heredia; Juan Sanchis; Francisco Javier Chorro; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Julio Núñez Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Sarah E Henson; Sean M Lang; Philip R Khoury; Cuixia Tian; Meilan M Rutter; Elaine M Urbina; Thomas D Ryan; Michael D Taylor; Tarek Alsaied Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 5.501