Literature DB >> 27038458

Protecting Nipple Perfusion by Devascularization and Surgical Delay in Patients at Risk for Ischemic Complications During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.

Danielle M Bertoni1, Dung Nguyen2, Danielle Rochlin2, Tina Hernandez-Boussard1, Shannon Meyer1, Nicole Choy1, Geoffrey C Gurtner2, Irene L Wapnir3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are expanding; however, high-risk patients have more ischemic complications. Surgical devascularization of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) prior to NSM can reduce complications. This study reports perfusion patterns and complications in high-risk patients undergoing 2-stage NSM.
METHODS: Surgical devascularization of the NAC was performed 3-6 weeks prior to NSM in 28 women. Risk factors included ptosis, obesity, smoking, prior breast surgery, and radiation. Using indocyanine green (ICG)-based fluorescence and an infrared camera, blood inflow was visualized intraoperatively. NAC perfusion patterns were classified as: V1, underlying breast; V2, surrounding skin; V3 = V1 + V2, or V4, capillary fill following devascularization. Ischemic complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Baseline perfusion for 54 breasts was 35 % V1, 32 % V2, and 33 % V3. Increasing ptosis was associated with V1 pattern: 86 % for grade 3, 31 % for grade 2, and 18 % for grade 1. Postdevascularization epidermolysis was observed in 63 % of V1 baseline, 41 % of V2, and 22 % of V3 (P = .042) and after NSM in 26 % for V1, 7 % for V2, and 6 % for V3 (P = .131). Ptosis was significantly associated with epidermolysis postdevascularization (P = .002) and NSM (P = .002). Smoking and BMI ≥30 were related to increased ischemic complications. Two or more risk factors were associated with postdevascularization ischemic changes (P = .026), but were not significant after NSM. Nipple loss was not observed, but 2 patients underwent partial areolar resection.
CONCLUSION: Adaptive circulatory changes after devascularization allow tissues to tolerate the additional ischemic challenge of mastectomy. Our findings support extending 2-staged operations to high-risk women previously considered unsuitable for NSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038458     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5201-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

2.  Two-Stage Versus One-Stage Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Timing of Surgery Prevents Nipple Loss.

Authors:  Tammy Ju; Julia Chandler; Arash Momeni; Geoffrey Gurtner; Jacqueline Tsai; Dung Nguyen; Irene Wapnir
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Preventing Nipple Loss by Surgical Delay in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Tammy Ju; Arash Momeni; Irene Wapnir
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The Use of a Hyaluronic Acid-Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane as an Adhesion Barrier during Nipple Delay before Nipple-preserving Mastectomy.

Authors:  Andreas M Lamelas; Eric M Jablonka; Marco A Harmaty; Philip J Torina
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 5.  Near-infrared fluorescence image-guidance in plastic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anouk J M Cornelissen; Tom J M van Mulken; Caitlin Graupner; Shan S Qiu; Xavier H A Keuter; René R W J van der Hulst; Rutger M Schols
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-02-27

6.  Indocyanine Green Angiography in Breast Reconstruction: Utility, Limitations, and Search for Standardization.

Authors:  Ariel C Johnson; Salih Colakoglu; Tae W Chong; David W Mathes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.