Literature DB >> 27037885

How benthic diatoms within natural communities respond to eight common herbicides with different modes of action.

Rebecca J Wood1, Simon M Mitrovic2, Richard P Lim2, Ben J Kefford3.   

Abstract

Herbicides are common pollutants of rivers in agricultural regions. These contaminants include various types of chemicals with different modes of toxic action. Herbicides can have toxic effects on freshwater benthic diatoms, the base of the aquatic food web. We examined the effects of (non-mixture) herbicide exposure to the health of diatoms for eight common herbicides with three different modes of action; the photosystem II (PSII) inhibitors: atrazine, simazine, hexazinone, tebuthiuron and diuron; two auxinic herbicides: MCPA and 2,4-D; and the EPSP synthase inhibitor: glyphosate. Benthic diatoms within riverine communities were exposed to each herbicide in rapid toxicity tests at concentrations of 50, 200 and 500μgL(-1). The most sensitive taxa were Gomphonema spp. and Encyonema gracilis. Navicula cryptotenella was the most tolerant to herbicide exposure. There was no significant effect of the different herbicide modes of action at the community level. Herbicide mode of action did not alter which taxa were most sensitive within the community and sensitivity rankings of the dominant diatom taxa were similar for each of the eight herbicides. The consistency of the results between herbicides suggests that freshwater benthic diatoms may be suitable in situ indicators for detecting the toxicity of herbicides with differing modes of action.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algae; Benthic diatoms; Herbicide; Rivers; Sensitivity; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037885     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Sensitive vs. tolerant Nitzschia palea (Kützing) W. Smith strains to atrazine: a biochemical perspective.

Authors:  S M Esteves; S F P Almeida; S Gonçalves; F Rimet; A Bouchez; E Figueira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Ecological value of macrophyte cover in creating habitat for microalgae (diatoms) and zooplankton (rotifers and crustaceans) in small field and forest water bodies.

Authors:  Sofia Celewicz-Gołdyn; Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.