Literature DB >> 27037438

The surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty does not influence patient-reported outcome : a national survey of 2118 patients with one-year follow-up.

O Leonardsson1, O Rolfson2, C Rogmark3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Hemiarthroplasty of the hip is usually carried out through either a direct lateral or posterior approach. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine any differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two surgical approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register we identified patients of 70 years and above who were recorded as having had a hemiarthroplasty during 2009. Only patients who had been treated with modern prostheses were included. A questionnaire was posted to those who remained alive one year after surgery. A total of 2118 patients (78% of those available) with a mean age of 85 years (70 to 102) returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients who had undergone surgery through a posterior approach reported a higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EQ-5D mean 0.52 versus 0.47, p = 0.009), less pain (visual analogue scale mean 17 versus 19, p = 0.02) and greater satisfaction with the result of surgery (visual analogue scale mean 22 versus 24, p = 0.02) than those who had a direct lateral approach. However, after adjusting for age, gender, cognitive impairment and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, no association was found between surgical approach and HRQoL, residual pain or patient satisfaction. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty does not seem to affect the patient-perceived HRQoL, residual pain or patient satisfaction one year after surgery on elderly patients. The choice of approach should be based on other factors, such as the risk of dislocation. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; Health-related quality of life; Hemiarthroplasty; Hip fracture; Patient-reported outcome; Surgical approach; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037438     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Samuel T Kunkel; Matthew J Sabatino; Ravinder Kang; David S Jevsevar; Wayne E Moschetti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-08-29

2.  Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Torbjørn B Kristensen; Tarjei Vinje; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesæter; Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Reduced revision rate and maintained function after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures after transition from posterolateral to direct lateral approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Mukka; Björn Knutsson; Ammar Majeed; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  A scoping review comparing two common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  James Fullam; Paraskevas G Theodosi; John Charity; Victoria A Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Posterolateral or direct lateral approach for cemented hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture (APOLLO): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation and natural experiment alongside.

Authors:  Maria C J M Tol; Nienke W Willigenburg; Hanna C Willems; Taco Gosens; Ariena Rasker; Martin J Heetveld; Martijn G M Schotanus; Johanna M Van Dongen; Bart Eggen; Mate Kormos; Stéphanie L Van der Pas; Aad W Van der Vaart; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.