Literature DB >> 27037434

Radiographic failure and rates of re-operation after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparison of surgical techniques.

H T Spencer1, L Hsu1, J Sodl1, A Arianjam1, E H Yian1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare radiographic failure and re-operation rates of anatomical coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstructional techniques with non-anatomical techniques after chronic high grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed chronic AC joint reconstructions within a region-wide healthcare system to identify surgical technique, complications, radiographic failure and re-operations. Procedures fell into four categories: (1) modified Weaver-Dunn, (2) allograft fixed through coracoid and clavicular tunnels, (3) allograft loop coracoclavicular fixation, and (4) combined allograft loop and synthetic cortical button fixation. Among 167 patients (mean age 38.1 years, (standard deviation (sd) 14.7) treated at least a four week interval after injury, 154 had post-operative radiographs available for analysis.
RESULTS: Radiographic failure occurred in 33/154 cases (21.4%), with the lowest rate in Technique 4 (2/42 4.8%, p = 0.001). Half the failures occurred by six weeks, and the Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 24 months was 94.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79.6 to 98.6) for Technique 4 and 69.9% (95% CI 59.4 to 78.3) for the other techniques when combined. In multivariable survival analysis, Technique 4 had better survival than other techniques (Hazard Ratio 0.162, 95% CI 0.039 to 0.068, p = 0.013). Among 155 patients with a minimum of six months post-operative insurance coverage, re-operation occurred in 9.7% (15 patients). However, in multivariable logistic regression, Technique 4 did not reach a statistically significant lower risk for re-operation (odds ratio 0.254, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.3, p = 0.11).
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective series, anatomical CC ligament reconstruction using combined synthetic cortical button and allograft loop fixation had the lowest rate of radiographic failure. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using combined synthetic cortical button and allograft loop fixation had the lowest rate of radiographic failure. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint; Shoulder separation; Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; Acromioclavicular reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037434     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.35935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

1.  Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Renato Andrade; Pedro Silva Moreira; Luís Coutinho; Olufemi R Ayeni; Nuno Sevivas; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic Technique for Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability With Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using a Gracilis Tendon Graft.

Authors:  Nina Pühringer; Jens Agneskirchner
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-06

4.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Emre Çalışal; Levent Uğur
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Onur Kocadal; Korcan Yüksel; Melih Güven
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Eng-Meng Nicholas Yeo; William Yeo; Tijauw-Tjoen Denny Lie
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-09

8.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Acromion Clavicular Joint Reconstruction with LARS Ligament in Acute Dislocation.

Authors:  Alessandro Geraci; Alberto Riccardi; Isabella Monia Montagner; Dario Pilla; Lawrece Camarda; Antonio D'Arienzo; Michele D'arienzo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-03

10.  High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Arrisna Artha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.