Literature DB >> 27037411

Nanofluidic Digital PCR and Extended Genotyping of RAS and BRAF for Improved Selection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients for Anti-EGFR Therapies.

Daniel Azuara1, Cristina Santos2, Adriana Lopez-Doriga3, Julieta Grasselli4, Marga Nadal1, Xavier Sanjuan5, Fátima Marin1, Joana Vidal6, Robert Montal7, Victor Moreno3, Beatriz Bellosillo8, Guillem Argiles9, Elena Elez9, Rodrigo Dienstmann9, Clara Montagut6, Josep Tabernero9, Gabriel Capellá10, Ramon Salazar11.   

Abstract

The clinical significance of low-frequent RAS pathway-mutated alleles and the optimal sensitivity cutoff value in the prediction of response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the added value of genotyping an extended RAS panel using a robust nanofluidic digital PCR (dPCR) approach. A panel of 34 hotspots, including RAS (KRAS and NRAS exons 2/3/4) and BRAF (V600E), was analyzed in tumor FFPE samples from 102 mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy. dPCR was compared with conventional quantitative PCR (qPCR). Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated to the mutational status and the mutated allele fraction. Tumor response evaluations were not available in 9 patients and were excluded for response rate analysis. Twenty-two percent of patients were positive for one mutation with qPCR (mutated alleles ranged from 2.1% to 66.6%). Analysis by dPCR increased the number of positive patients to 47%. Mutated alleles for patients only detected by dPCR ranged from 0.04% to 10.8%. An inverse correlation between the fraction of mutated alleles and radiologic response was observed. ROC analysis showed that a fraction of 1% or higher of any mutated alleles offered the best predictive value for all combinations of RAS and BRAF analysis. In addition, this threshold also optimized prediction both PFS and OS. We conclude that mutation testing using an extended gene panel, including RAS and BRAF with a threshold of 1% improved prediction of response to anti-EGFR therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(5); 1106-12. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037411     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of mutant allele fractions in driver genes in colorectal cancer - biological and clinical insights.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Elena Elez; Guillem Argiles; Ignacio Matos; Enrique Sanz-Garcia; Carolina Ortiz; Teresa Macarulla; Jaume Capdevila; Maria Alsina; Tamara Sauri; Helena Verdaguer; Marta Vilaro; Fiorella Ruiz-Pace; Cristina Viaplana; Ariadna Garcia; Stefania Landolfi; Hector G Palmer; Paolo Nuciforo; Jordi Rodon; Ana Vivancos; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J Vidal; L Muinelo; A Dalmases; F Jones; D Edelstein; M Iglesias; M Orrillo; A Abalo; C Rodríguez; E Brozos; Y Vidal; S Candamio; F Vázquez; J Ruiz; M Guix; L Visa; V Sikri; J Albanell; B Bellosillo; R López; C Montagut
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Grasselli; E Elez; G Caratù; J Matito; C Santos; T Macarulla; J Vidal; M Garcia; J M Viéitez; D Paéz; E Falcó; C Lopez Lopez; E Aranda; F Jones; V Sikri; P Nuciforo; R Fasani; J Tabernero; C Montagut; D Azuara; R Dienstmann; R Salazar; A Vivancos
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Prospective multicenter real-world RAS mutation comparison between OncoBEAM-based liquid biopsy and tissue analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jesús García-Foncillas; Josep Tabernero; Elena Élez; Enrique Aranda; Manuel Benavides; Carlos Camps; Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre; Rafael López; Laura Muinelo-Romay; Clara Montagut; Antonio Antón; Guillermo López; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Federico Rojo; Ana Vivancos
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Genomic heterogeneity and efficacy of PI3K pathway inhibitors in patients with gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Victor Rodriguez-Freixinos; Fiorella Ruiz-Pace; Lorena Fariñas-Madrid; Ana Christina Garrido-Castro; Guillermo Villacampa; Paolo Nuciforo; Ana Vivancos; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Ana Oaknin
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-03-08

6.  Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elena Elez; Chiara Chianese; Enrique Sanz-García; Erica Martinelli; Alba Noguerido; Francesco Mattia Mancuso; Ginevra Caratù; Judit Matito; Julieta Grasselli; Claudia Cardone; Riziero Esposito Abate; Giulia Martini; Cristina Santos; Teresa Macarulla; Guillem Argilés; Jaume Capdevila; Ariadna Garcia; Nuria Mulet; Evaristo Maiello; Nicola Normanno; Frederick Jones; Josep Tabernero; Fortunato Ciardello; Ramon Salazar; Ana Vivancos
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 6.603

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.