Literature DB >> 27037349

Reproductive coercion: an under-recognized challenge for primary care patients.

Sharon J Phillips1, Ariana H Bennett2, Michele R Hacker3, Marji Gold2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion impacts many women of reproductive age.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore how reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage, impacts women in a primary care population.
METHODS: We administered a survey to women accessing care at a family medicine clinic in the Bronx, NY. Reproductive coercion was defined as a positive response to at least one of five questions adapted from previous studies. We assessed the association of reproductive and demographic characteristics with a lifetime history of reproductive coercion.
RESULTS: At least one form of reproductive coercion was reported by 24% of the 97 respondents. Current lack of personal safety and a history of transactional sex for money or a place to stay were significantly associated with having experienced reproductive coercion (all P ≤ 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive coercion was common among women of reproductive age at this urban family medicine clinic in an underserved community, and was associated with other forms of control and violence. Clinicians are advised to discuss birth control sabotage and pregnancy coercion with their patients.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth control sabotage; contraception; patients; reproductive coercion; underserved; violence; women.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037349     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Women's Experiences of Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy.

Authors:  Charvonne N Holliday; Heather L McCauley; Jay G Silverman; Edmund Ricci; Michele R Decker; Daniel J Tancredi; Jessica G Burke; Patricia Documét; Sonya Borrero; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  A Pilot Project Exploring Medical Students' Barriers to Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion.

Authors:  Sarah E Stumbar; Melissa Ward-Peterson; Carla S Lupi
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2019-10-08

3.  Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy risk among adolescent women with a history of foster care involvement.

Authors:  Morgan E PettyJohn; Taylor A Reid; Elizabeth Miller; Katherine W Bogen; Heather L McCauley
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Nancy A Perrin; Amber Clough; Elizabeth Miller; Nancy E Glass
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2020-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.