Literature DB >> 2703642

Effect of timing and number of baseline blood pressure determinations on postural blood pressure response.

S L Mader1, R M Palmer, L Z Rubenstein.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that the blood pressure response to standing may depend on the method of establishing baseline blood pressure. Three hundred elderly subjects previously completed a postural blood pressure protocol with three supine baseline blood pressure readings obtained two minutes apart prior to standing. Comparison of the readings showed a significant drop between the first and the second (P less than .001) but not between the second and third supine systolic blood pressures. The difference between the first supine systolic blood pressure and the one minute standing blood pressure was significantly greater than that between the third supine systolic blood pressure and the one minute standing blood pressure (P less than .001). A second group was prospectively studied to determine whether the change in blood pressure after standing was greater if only a single baseline reading was taken rather than multiple readings, and whether the decline in blood pressure over three readings was related to duration supine or to the number of blood pressures taken. This group also demonstrated a decline in systolic blood pressure with three serial readings. We conclude that supine blood pressure declines significantly between the first and second readings taken two minutes apart and is secondary to the repetition of readings and not the duration supine. However, this change in supine blood pressure does not significantly alter the blood pressure response to standing. Thus, it appears that a single baseline supine blood pressure measurement is adequate for determining the postural blood pressure response, and that pooling of multiple baseline readings may not be appropriate.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2703642     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb02641.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  3 in total

1.  Head-up tilt table test: how far and how long?

Authors:  R K Khurana; E M Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 2.  A practical guide to active stand testing and analysis using continuous beat-to-beat non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Ciarán Finucane; V K van Wijnen; C W Fan; C Soraghan; L Byrne; B E Westerhof; R Freeman; A Fedorowski; M P M Harms; W Wieling; R Kenny
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Is there a relationship between supine systemic blood pressure and orthostatic hypotension in the elderly?

Authors:  E Vargas; M Lye
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.