Kristen R Scarpato1, Daniel A Barocas2. 1. Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-1302 Medical Center North, Nashville TN 37232. Electronic address: kristen.r.scarpato@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-1302 Medical Center North, Nashville TN 37232.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In an effort to limit prostate cancer (PCa) overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which have occurred in response to widespread prostate specific antigen testing, numerous strategies aimed at improved risk stratification of patients with PCa have evolved. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used in concert with prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsies to improve sensitivity and specificity of these tests. There are limited data on how multiparametric MRI can be incorporated into active surveillance (AS) protocols. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed literature search of available English language publications on PCa, AS, and MRI was conducted. Appropriate articles were selected and included for review. Bibliographies were also used to expand our search. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data from 41 studies were reviewed. AS inclusion criteria and protocols varied among studies, as did indications for use of MRI. Technological improvements are briefly highlighted. Studies are broadly categorized and discussed according to the role of MRI in patient selection, disease staging, and monitoring in AS protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Although improvements in MRI technology have been useful for biopsy guidance and in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, this literature search demonstrates that more prospective research is needed, specifically regarding how this promising technology can be incorporated into AS protocols.
INTRODUCTION: In an effort to limit prostate cancer (PCa) overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which have occurred in response to widespread prostate specific antigen testing, numerous strategies aimed at improved risk stratification of patients with PCa have evolved. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used in concert with prostate specific antigen testing and prostate biopsies to improve sensitivity and specificity of these tests. There are limited data on how multiparametric MRI can be incorporated into active surveillance (AS) protocols. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed literature search of available English language publications on PCa, AS, and MRI was conducted. Appropriate articles were selected and included for review. Bibliographies were also used to expand our search. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data from 41 studies were reviewed. AS inclusion criteria and protocols varied among studies, as did indications for use of MRI. Technological improvements are briefly highlighted. Studies are broadly categorized and discussed according to the role of MRI in patient selection, disease staging, and monitoring in AS protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Although improvements in MRI technology have been useful for biopsy guidance and in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, this literature search demonstrates that more prospective research is needed, specifically regarding how this promising technology can be incorporated into AS protocols.
Authors: Nima Nassiri; Daniel J Margolis; Shyam Natarajan; Devi S Sharma; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael S Manak; Jonathan S Varsanik; Brad J Hogan; Matt J Whitfield; Wendell R Su; Nikhil Joshi; Nicolai Steinke; Andrew Min; Delaney Berger; Robert J Saphirstein; Gauri Dixit; Thiagarajan Meyyappan; Hui-May Chu; Kevin B Knopf; David M Albala; Grannum R Sant; Ashok C Chander Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Edward Chang; Tonye A Jones; Shyam Natarajan; Devi Sharma; Demetrios Simopoulos; Daniel J Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mats Steinholtz Ahlberg; Hans-Olov Adami; Kerri Beckmann; Helena Bertilsson; Ola Bratt; Declan Cahill; Lars Egevad; Hans Garmo; Lars Holmberg; Eva Johansson; Antti Rannikko; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Fredrik Jäderling; Cecilia Wassberg; Ulrika W N Åberg; Anna Bill-Axelson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Samuel W D Merriel; Liz Hetherington; Andrew Seggie; Joanna T Castle; William Cross; Monique J Roobol; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Caroline M Moore Journal: BJU Int Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 5.588