Literature DB >> 27035641

The effect of sulforaphane on the cell cycle, apoptosis and expression of cyclin D1 and p21 in the A549 non-small cell lung cancer cell line.

Agnieszka Żuryń1, Anna Litwiniec2, Barbara Safiejko-Mroczka3, Anna Klimaszewska-Wiśniewska1, Maciej Gagat1, Adrian Krajewski1, Lidia Gackowska4, Dariusz Grzanka5.   

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFN) is present in plants belonging to Cruciferae family and was first isolated from broccoli sprouts. Chemotherapeutic and anticarcinogenic properties of sulforaphane were demonstrated, however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study we evaluated the expression of cyclin D1 and p21 protein in SFN-treated A549 cells and correlated these results with the extent of cell death and/or cell cycle alterations, as well as determined a potential contribution of cyclin D1 to cell death. A549 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SFN (30, 60 and 90 µM) for 24 h. Morphological and ultrastructural changes were observed using light, transmission electron microscope and videomicroscopy. Image-based cytometry was applied to evaluate the effect of SFN on apoptosis and the cell cycle. Cyclin D1 and p21 expression was determined by flow cytometry, RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence. siRNA was used to evaluate the role of cyclin D1 in the process of suforaphane-induced cell death. We found that the percentage of cyclin D1-positive cells decreased after the treatment with SFN, but at the same time mean fluorescence intensity reflecting cyclin D1 content was increased at 30 µM SFN and decreased at 60 and 90 µM SFN. Percentage of p21-positive cells increased following the treatment, with the highest increase at 60 µM SFN, at which concentration mean fluorescence intensity of this protein was also significantly increased. The 30-µM dose of SFN induced an increased G2/M phase population along with a decreased polyploid fraction of cells, which implies a functional G2/M arrest. The major mode of cell death induced by SFN was necrosis and, to a lower degree apoptosis. Transfection with cyclin D1-siRNA resulted in significantly compromised fraction of apoptotic and necrotic cells, which suggests that cyclin D1 is an important determinant of the therapeutic efficiency of SFN in the A549 cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27035641     DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  23 in total

1.  The role of Sulforaphane in cancer chemoprevention and health benefits: a mini-review.

Authors:  Reza Bayat Mokhtari; Narges Baluch; Tina S Homayouni; Evgeniya Morgatskaya; Sushil Kumar; Parandis Kazemi; Herman Yeger
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Sulforaphane suppresses EMT and metastasis in human lung cancer through miR-616-5p-mediated GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathways.

Authors:  Da-Xuan Wang; Yu-Jiao Zou; Xi-Bin Zhuang; Shu-Xing Chen; Yong Lin; Wen-Lan Li; Jun-Jin Lin; Zhi-Qiang Lin
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  In Vitro-In Vivo Dose Response of Ursolic Acid, Sulforaphane, PEITC, and Curcumin in Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Christina N Ramirez; Wenji Li; Chengyue Zhang; Renyi Wu; Shan Su; Chao Wang; Linbo Gao; Ran Yin; Ah-Ng Kong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Therapeutic effects of sulforaphane in ulcerative colitis: effect on antioxidant activity, mitochondrial biogenesis and DNA polymerization.

Authors:  Abdullah Alattar; Reem Alshaman; Mohammed M H Al-Gayyar
Journal:  Redox Rep       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.696

5.  MicroRNA-137-regulated AKT serine/threonine kinase 2 inhibits tumor growth and sensitizes cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhuming Lu; Minghui Wang; Shuoyun Wu; Min Ye; Zhichao Lin; Tao Shun; Chuxiao Duan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Correction to: In Vitro-In Vivo Dose Response of Ursolic Acid, Sulforaphane, PEITC, and Curcumin in Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Christina N Ramirez; Wenji Li; Chengyue Zhang; Renyi Wu; Shan Su; Chao Wang; Linbo Gao; Ran Yin; Ah-Ng Tony Kong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Anti-proliferative potential of Glucosamine in renal cancer cells via inducing cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase.

Authors:  Long-Sheng Wang; Shao-Jun Chen; Jun-Feng Zhang; Meng-Nan Liu; Jun-Hua Zheng; Xu-Dong Yao
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  [Study on Effects and Mechanisms of Phytochemicals in Vegetables and Fruits 
in Preventing and Treating Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Tiantian Guo; Congmin Liu; Zhaoyu Gao; Yutong He
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 9.  Anticancer Activity of Sulforaphane: The Epigenetic Mechanisms and the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Xuling Su; Xin Jiang; Lingbin Meng; Xiaoming Dong; Yanjun Shen; Ying Xin
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Biological Mechanisms Induced by Soybean Agglutinin Using an Intestinal Cell Model of Monogastric Animals.

Authors:  Li Pan; Yan Liu; Hainan Lan; Nan Bao; Yuan Zhao; Hui Sun; Guixin Qin; Mohammed Hamdy Farouk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.