Literature DB >> 27035581

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Surgical Learning Curve.

Benjamin C Mayo1, Dustin H Massel, Daniel D Bohl, William W Long, Krishna D Modi, Kern Singh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case-series OBJECTIVE.: The aim of the study was to investigate changes in intraoperative and postoperative parameters associated with the surgical learning curve for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is a common surgical spine procedure. The surgical learning curve for this procedure has not been previously characterized.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical database of consecutive patients who underwent primary 1-2 level ACDF for degenerative spine disease from 2006 to 2014 was reviewed. Patients with concurrent or revision procedures were excluded. The series began after the surgeon's fellowship and includes his first case as an attending. A total of 374 patients were divided sequentially into cohorts of 125 (early), 125 (middle), and 124 (late). Statistical analyses utilized independent sample t tests, chi squared tests, and multivariate regression adjusted for preoperative characteristics. The learning curve of operative time was characterized using three-parameter asymptotic regression and two separate linear regressions.
RESULTS: The earliest cohort had a greater comorbidity burden, percentage of smokers, and Medicare patients, with fewer workers' compensation patients when compared to later cohorts. Later cohorts demonstrated decreased mean operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) and increased arthrodesis rate. Asymptotic and linear regression analyses demonstrated that 50% of the learning curve occurred at case 17 and 31, respectively, whereas 90% of potential improvement occurred by case 56 and 57, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A significant learning curve exists for surgeons performing ACDFs. Patients undergoing ACDF will experience shorter operations, less EBL, and greater arthrodesis rates as the surgeon gains experience. Operative proficiency can be expected to occur by case 60, with arthrodesis rate increasing over a longer period. These results suggest that despite longer operative times and increased EBL with earlier cases, ACDF can safely and effectively be performed at the onset of a surgeon's career. This conclusion may be useful to new surgeons debating between operative and nonoperative management of cervical degenerative disc disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27035581     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  102 lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies: one surgeon's learning curve.

Authors:  Anouar Bourghli; Derek Cawley; Felipe Novoa; Manuela Rey; Abdulmajeed Alzakri; Daniel Larrieu; Jean-Marc Vital; Olivier Gille; Louis Boissiere; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Successful fusion versus pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation: a comprehensive imaging review.

Authors:  John C Benson; Vance T Lehman; Arjun S Sebastian; Noelle A Larson; Ahmad Nassr; Felix E Diehn; John T Wald; Naveen S Murthy
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.995

3.  Nano-Scale Surface Modifications to Advance Current Treatment Options for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD).

Authors:  Anne Yau; Ian Sands; Yupeng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Res Ther       Date:  2019-10-06

4.  Preliminary results of anterior cervical arthroplasty by porous alumina ceramic cage for cervical disc herniation surgery.

Authors:  Keyvan Mostofi; Babak Gharaei Moghaddam; Morad Peyravi; Reza Karimi Khouzani
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  The CURE Protocol: evaluation and external validation of a new public health strategy for treating paediatric hydrocephalus in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Jacob R Lepard; Michael C Dewan; Stephanie H Chen; Olufemi B Bankole; John Mugamba; Peter Ssenyonga; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Benjamin C Warf
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-23

6.  Establishment of a nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Chengyue Ji; Yuluo Rong; Jiaxing Wang; Guoyong Yin; Jin Fan; Pengyu Tang; Dongdong Jiang; Wei Liu; Xuhui Ge; Shunzhi Yu; Weihua Cai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Risk factors for delay in surgery for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Sean P Renfree; Justin L Makovicka; Andrew S Chung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

8.  Impact of Operation Time on 30-Day Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Nathan J Lee; Parth Kothari; James Dowdell; Samuel C Overley; Javier Z Guzman; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-31

9.  Surgical and radiological outcomes after posterior vertebral column resection according to the surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Byoung Hun Lee; Seung-Jae Hyun; Sanghyun Han; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Yongjung J Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-02-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.