Literature DB >> 27034510

Bayesian Group Sequential Clinical Trial Design using Total Toxicity Burden and Progression-Free Survival.

Brian P Hobbs1, Peter F Thall1, Steven H Lin2.   

Abstract

Delivering radiation to eradicate a solid tumor while minimizing damage to nearby critical organs remains a challenge. For esophageal cancer, radiation therapy may damage the heart or lungs, and several qualitatively different, possibly recurrent toxicities associated with chemoradiation or surgery may occur, each at two or more possible grades. In this article, we describe a Bayesian group sequential clinical trial design, based on total toxicity burden (TTB) and progression-free survival duration, for comparing two radiation therapy modalities for esophageal cancer. Each patient's toxicities are modeled as a multivariate doubly stochastic Poisson point process, with marks identifying toxicity grades. Each grade of each type of toxicity is assigned a severity weight, elicited from clinical oncologists familiar with the disease and treatments. TTB is defined as a severity-weighted sum over the different toxicities that may occur up to 12 months from the start of treatment. Latent frailties are used to formulate a multivariate model for all outcomes. Group sequential decision rules are based on posterior mean TTB and progression-free survival time. The proposed design is shown to provide both larger power and smaller mean sample size when compared to a conventional bivariate group sequential design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; co-primary endpoints; frailty model; prior elicitation; radiation oncology; sequentially adaptive design; utilities

Year:  2015        PMID: 27034510      PMCID: PMC4809549          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  19 in total

1.  Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prior Effective Sample Size in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.728

3.  The analysis of multiple endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  S J Pocock; N L Geller; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  On the design and analysis of randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  D I Tang; N L Geller; S J Pocock
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Bivariate sequential designs for phase II trials.

Authors:  M R Conaway; G R Petroni
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach.

Authors:  D L DeMets; K K Lan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Jul 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  P C O'Brien
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Elicitation of health state utilities in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Swinburn; Andrew Lloyd; Paul Nathan; Toni K Choueiri; David Cella; Maureen P Neary
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  Four-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhang; Kuai-le Zhao; Thomas M Guerrero; Sean E McGuire; Brian Yaremko; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Zhouguang Hui; Yupeng Li; Wayne D Newhauser; Radhe Mohan; Zhongxing Liao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Proton beam therapy for gastrointestinal cancers: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Shahed N Badiyan; Christopher L Hallemeier; Steven H Lin; Matthew D Hall; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Andrew Quartin; Brian P Hobbs; Vincent Robert-Edan; Cynthia Cely; Cynthia Bell; Genevieve Lyons; Tai Pham; Roland Schein; Yimin Geng; Karim Lakhal; Chaan S Ng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Brian P Hobbs; Vivek Verma; Rebecca S Tidwell; Grace L Smith; Xiudong Lei; Erin M Corsini; Isabel Mok; Xiong Wei; Luyang Yao; Xin Wang; Ritsuko U Komaki; Joe Y Chang; Stephen G Chun; Melenda D Jeter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani; Mariela Blum-Murphy; Ara A Vaporciyan; Reza J Mehran; Albert C Koong; Saumil J Gandhi; Wayne L Hofstetter; Theodore S Hong; Thomas F Delaney; Zhongxing Liao; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Emily C Zabor; Alexander M Kaizer; Brian P Hobbs
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Robust treatment comparison based on utilities of semi-competing risks in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan; Sarah McAvoy; Daniel R Gomez
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Bayesian and frequentist approaches to sequential monitoring for futility in oncology basket trials: A comparison of Simon's two-stage design and Bayesian predictive probability monitoring with information sharing across baskets.

Authors:  Alexander Kaizer; Emily Zabor; Lei Nie; Brian Hobbs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Activity-Based Costing of Intensity-Modulated Proton versus Photon Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil G Thaker; David Boyce-Fappiano; Matthew S Ning; Dario Pasalic; Alexis Guzman; Grace Smith; Emma B Holliday; James Incalcaterra; Adam S Garden; Simona F Shaitelman; G Brandon Gunn; C David Fuller; Pierre Blanchard; Thomas W Feeley; Robert S Kaplan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.